本文選題：南朝　切入點(diǎn)：君權(quán)　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：劉宋立國之后,門閥政治被打破,南朝的君主們都在進(jìn)行皇權(quán)伸張的努力,并積極的向皇權(quán)政治復(fù)歸。相權(quán)與皇權(quán)并駕齊驅(qū)的局面將成為歷史。然而,為相者們并不甘心就如此放棄自己的權(quán)力。他們通過積極的政治活動鞏固相職應(yīng)有的權(quán)力。結(jié)果,不甘寂寞的相權(quán)必然與伸張的皇權(quán)發(fā)生沖突。 本文根據(jù)為相者所屬社會階層的不同,分別對宗室王擔(dān)任相職、世族擔(dān)任相職、寒人擔(dān)任相職進(jìn)行研究。宗室王擔(dān)任相職反映出南朝君主對宗室的依賴與利用。然而,在宋齊時期這種依賴與利用很快轉(zhuǎn)變成防范與猜忌,君相關(guān)系極為緊張,且波動不定。梁陳以后,為相宗室大多無所作為,與君主的關(guān)系和諧穩(wěn)定。世族擔(dān)任相職基本上是延續(xù)了東晉世族勢力的傳統(tǒng),但是時不與我。君主開始有選擇的任用世族為相,幫助自己治理國家,同時又采取限制措施以防為相世族坐大,威脅皇權(quán)的權(quán)威。在轉(zhuǎn)型期的宋齊,為相世族與君主多次產(chǎn)生沖突,關(guān)系緊張。梁陳以降,為相世族甘于為皇權(quán)服務(wù),君相關(guān)系開始趨于緩和穩(wěn)定。寒人擔(dān)任相職實(shí)質(zhì)上凸顯了寒人勢力在南朝崛起的歷史大勢。這些寒人大多以軍功起家,得君主的優(yōu)寵而居相位。也正因為如此,宋齊時期,君主處處防范這些掌握軍權(quán)的寒人,最終逼得為相寒人舉兵自保。梁末至陳,時局混亂,戰(zhàn)爭頻繁,君主不得不仰仗擁兵的為相寒人,君相關(guān)系反而處在平穩(wěn)和睦的狀態(tài)。 從社會階層的劃分入手考察南朝君相關(guān)系,一方面可以體現(xiàn)魏晉南北朝的時代特征,另一方面也便于全面、具體、動態(tài)的把握這個時期君相關(guān)系的類型、表現(xiàn)、影響因素等。在此基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步的的理解南朝政局以及皇權(quán)政治的變化軌跡。
[Abstract]:After Liu Song Liguo, the politics of the door warlords were broken, and the monarchs of the Southern Dynasty were making great efforts to assert the imperial power, and actively returned to the politics of the imperial power. The situation of equal power and imperial power will become a history. However, Those who are not willing to give up their own power. Through active political activities, they consolidate their due power. As a result, unwilling to be lonely power inevitably conflicts with the imperial power. According to the different social stratum of the clan, this paper makes a study of the clan Wang as the minister, the family as the minister and the cold man as the minister. The monarch's reliance on and utilization of the monarch in the Southern Dynasty, however, is reflected in the fact that the monarch plays the role of minister. During the Song and Qi period, this kind of dependence and utilization quickly turned into prevention and suspicion, and the relationship between the monarch and the minister was extremely tense and volatile. After Liang Chen, most of the patriarchal clans did nothing. The relationship with the monarch is harmonious and stable. The clan held the post of the clan in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, but not with me. The monarch began to choose the clan to help him to run the country. At the same time, restrictive measures were also taken to prevent them from sitting up and threatening the authority of the imperial power. In the Song and Qi dynasties in the transitional period, there were many conflicts between the clan and the monarch, and the relations were tense. The relationship between the monarch and the phase began to ease and stabilize. In essence, the appointment of the Cold Man to the post of minister highlighted the historical trend of the rise of the forces of the Cold Man in the Southern Dynasty. Most of these people started with military merit and gained the superior favor of the monarch. That is why, during the Song and Qi dynasties, The monarch guard against the cold people who hold the military power everywhere, and eventually force him to hold the troops to protect himself. At the end of Liang Dynasty to Chen, the situation is chaotic and the war is frequent, so the monarch has to rely on those who hold the troops for the cold people, so the relationship between the monarch and the enemy is in a stable and harmonious state. Starting with the division of social strata, the study of the relationship between the monarch and the emperor in the Southern Dynasty can, on the one hand, reflect the characteristics of the times of the Wei, Jin, and the Southern and Northern dynasties, on the other hand, it is also convenient to grasp the types and manifestations of the monarch and phase relations in this period. On this basis, further understanding of the political situation of the Southern Dynasty and the changing track of imperial politics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K239.1;D691.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 �？偙�;劉裕門第考[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1982年01期

2 �？偙�;晉恭帝之死和劉裕的顧命大臣[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1986年02期

3 陳勇;劉宋時期的皇權(quán)與禁衛(wèi)軍[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1988年03期

4 王鏗;論南朝宋齊時期的“寒人典掌機(jī)要”[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1995年01期

5 唐春生;蕭子良研究的幾個問題[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

6 王毅;劉宋統(tǒng)治階級的內(nèi)部關(guān)系與劉宋政權(quán)的興亡[J];東南文化;1989年02期

7 霍存福;論皇帝行使權(quán)力的類型與皇權(quán)、相權(quán)問題(中)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1990年03期

8 陳金鳳;方潛龍;;魏晉南朝九品中正制與皇權(quán)政治[J];臨沂師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期

9 張星久;試析中國封建君主專制制度的內(nèi)在基本矛盾——對中國君主制度研究的基本命題的一個嘗試性解答[J];政治學(xué)研究;1998年04期

10 王明德;;從內(nèi)、外朝之設(shè)看皇權(quán)與相權(quán)之間的博弈關(guān)系[J];求索;2010年01期

，

本文編號：1619405