發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-03 19:28

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 《春秋》三傳 今古文論爭(zhēng) 雙重屬性 興盛 學(xué)術(shù)變化　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：孔子據(jù)魯史而作《春秋》,借《春秋》之言來(lái)褒貶、正禮制,被后世奉為圣人經(jīng)典。然圣人之義非常人所能通曉,故出現(xiàn)解經(jīng)之作,《左傳》即是其中之一。作為“《春秋》三傳”之一,《左傳》是極為特殊的存在,在今文經(jīng)學(xué)家的打壓之下,卻逆勢(shì)而上成為顯學(xué)。為此本文擬從《左傳》以及《春秋》左氏學(xué)為出發(fā)點(diǎn),探尋《左傳》的不同之處,《春秋》左氏學(xué)的興盛歷程、以及其何以能長(zhǎng)久興盛不衰等問(wèn)題。本文從三個(gè)大的方面展開(kāi)論述,第一部分為探討《左傳》以及《春秋》左氏學(xué)的形成與發(fā)展歷程,將《春秋》左氏學(xué)興盛放在其時(shí)代發(fā)展的背景下加以思考。其主要包括《左傳》與《春秋》之間的關(guān)系,《左傳》自身的特性為何:述史與傳經(jīng),以及在兩漢發(fā)展史上占據(jù)重要位置的今古文論爭(zhēng)中《左傳》扮演著怎樣的角色與地位。這一部分將對(duì)《左傳》形成整體性的認(rèn)知起到幫助。第二部分為采用不同的角度來(lái)觀察《春秋》左氏學(xué)如何走向興盛以及興盛的具體表現(xiàn)。其中包括經(jīng)學(xué)視域與史學(xué)視域。經(jīng)學(xué)方面闡述《春秋》左氏學(xué)如何一步步完成從地位低微至成為政府科舉選官之準(zhǔn)則,即東漢時(shí)期的蓬勃發(fā)展;三國(guó)時(shí)期《春秋》左氏學(xué)實(shí)現(xiàn)與今文經(jīng)學(xué)地位翻轉(zhuǎn);兩晉時(shí)期,《春秋經(jīng)傳集解》助《春秋》左氏學(xué)登上新的臺(tái)階;以及唐代《左傳正義》的頒定,使《左傳》成為科舉考試之標(biāo)準(zhǔn),從而達(dá)到巔峰。而文史方面:闡述歷代文史學(xué)者對(duì)《左傳》的具體態(tài)度,文史大家們對(duì)《左傳》的肯定,從側(cè)面推動(dòng)了《左傳》影響力的加強(qiáng)。第三部分則著重分析從學(xué)術(shù)角度來(lái)看,《春秋》左氏學(xué)憑借哪些因素能以弱勢(shì)地位成為當(dāng)世之顯學(xué),如《左傳》自身的解經(jīng)特點(diǎn)、學(xué)風(fēng)的變化對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展的影響、《左傳》不斷地完善自身、兼采今古經(jīng)學(xué)之長(zhǎng)的影響,后世學(xué)者對(duì)《春秋》三傳的不斷研究也是推動(dòng)《春秋》左氏學(xué)向前發(fā)展的動(dòng)力�？偟膩�(lái)說(shuō),《左傳》所具有的史學(xué)思想、原則以及其“史、義”結(jié)合的內(nèi)涵,使其在經(jīng)學(xué)、史學(xué)領(lǐng)域有著重要影響,“經(jīng)”與“史”在《左傳》上體現(xiàn)了微妙的平衡關(guān)系�？v使《左傳》為偽作,也絲毫不會(huì)對(duì)其學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值產(chǎn)生影響。
[Abstract]:Confucius wrote "Spring and Autumn" according to the history of Lu, by the words of "Spring and Autumn" to praise and derogate, the proper ritual system, is regarded as a sage classic, but the meaning of saints can not be understood by ordinary people, so there is the interpretation of the Sutra. Zuo Zhuan is one of them. As one of the three legends of the Spring and Autumn period, Zuo Zhuan is a very special existence, under the pressure of the scholars of the Confucian classics. Therefore, this paper intends to explore the differences of Zuo Zhuan and the prosperous course of Zuo's study from the perspective of Zuo Zhuan and Chun Qiu's study. The first part is to discuss the formation and development of Zuozhuan and Chun Qiu. It mainly includes the relationship between Zuo Zhuan and the Spring and Autumn period, and the characteristics of Zuo Zhuan. And the role and position of Zuo Zhuan in the debate of ancient Chinese prose, which occupies an important position in the history of the Han Dynasty. This part will help to form the whole cognition of Zuo Zhuan. The second part is to adopt different methods. From the perspective of "Spring and Autumn", how Zuo's studies become prosperous and the concrete manifestation of prosperity, including the field of view of Confucian classics and the field of historiography. In the aspect of Confucian studies, it explains how Zuo's studies have completed from the low to the lowest level step by step. Guidelines for the selection of officials for the Government Imperial examination. That is, the vigorous development of the Eastern Han Dynasty; The realization of Zuo's study in the period of the three Kingdoms and the reversal of the status of modern literary classics; In the period of Jin Dynasty, the interpretation of "Spring and Autumn Classic Biography" helped the "Spring and Autumn period" Zuo's study to rise to a new level; And the Tang Dynasty "Zuo Zhuan Justice", so that "Zuo Zhuan" became the standard of the imperial examination, so as to reach the peak. And literature and history: explain the history of the specific attitude of scholars to Zuo Zhuan. The affirmation of Zuo Zhuan has promoted the strengthening of Zuo Zhuan's influence from the side. The third part focuses on the analysis from the academic point of view. "Spring and Autumn" Zuo's study depends on what factors can become the status of weakness in the world, such as the characteristics of Zuo Zhuan's own interpretation of the classics, the influence of the change of the style of study on the academic development, and the continuous improvement of the "Zuo Zhuan". At the same time, with the influence of the ancient classics, the continuous research of the three legends of the Spring and Autumn period is also the driving force to promote the development of Zuo's study. In general, Zuo Zhuan has the historical thought of "Zuo Zhuan". The principle and its connotation of "history and righteousness" make it have an important influence in the field of classics and historiography. The "classics" and "history" embody a delicate balance in Zuo Zhuan, even though Zuo Zhuan is a fake. Nor does it affect its academic value at all.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K225.04

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜廣輝;鄧林;;今文經(jīng)學(xué)與古文經(jīng)學(xué)再認(rèn)識(shí)——從經(jīng)學(xué)史的分派談起[J];哲學(xué)研究;2016年02期

2 李明澤;;近十年《春秋谷梁傳》研究綜述[J];名作欣賞;2016年03期

3 李華;;《左傳》訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語(yǔ)和內(nèi)容以及訓(xùn)釋詞義的方法[J];寧夏師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

4 周倩;;近二十年經(jīng)史關(guān)系問(wèn)題研究述評(píng)[J];史學(xué)理論與史學(xué)史學(xué)刊;2014年00期

5 丁鼎;;漢代今、古文經(jīng)學(xué)研究二題[J];史林;2013年06期

6 夏繼先;;“史鑒”與“敘史”之別——從《國(guó)語(yǔ)》與《左傳》的敘事結(jié)構(gòu)差異看二者的編纂目的[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

7 王小虎;;論東漢今古文經(jīng)學(xué)的融合[J];洛陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

8 宗瑞仙;;東漢末年經(jīng)學(xué)教育衰微原因述略[J];齊魯師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

9 許雪濤;;何休公羊三世說(shuō)及其解經(jīng)方法[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2011年04期

10 呂海龍;;論“文史兩分”認(rèn)識(shí)的三階段——兼論《史通》在此過(guò)程中的理論意義[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2011年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 程水金;;論《公羊傳》的歷史褒貶及其文化漸進(jìn)觀[A];《春秋》三傳與經(jīng)學(xué)文化[C];2009年

2 耿紀(jì)平;;《春秋》三傳義理通貫說(shuō)[A];《春秋》三傳與經(jīng)學(xué)文化[C];2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃文麗;歷史與文學(xué)[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

2 孫旭紅;居今與志古：宋代《春秋》學(xué)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

3 金永健;清代《左傳》考證研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 朱翠翠;《左傳》與漢代今古文經(jīng)學(xué)之爭(zhēng)[D];聊城大學(xué);2013年

2 宋淑華;陸淳《春秋》三書(shū)研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2012年

3 張莉明;論《文心雕龍》對(duì)《史通》的影響[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

4 李凱;《左傳》“君子曰”研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1488169