本文關(guān)鍵詞： 貳臣 評騭話語 彈性空間 話語權(quán) 等差格局　出處：《北京社會科學(xué)》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：評騭話語是清初士林觀照貳臣?xì)夤?jié)問題的常態(tài)化表達(dá)方式。在理學(xué)主導(dǎo)的明清社會,關(guān)于貳臣問題的評騭話語表達(dá)難以悖離君臣倫理的總體規(guī)范,但并非是對倫理規(guī)范毫無參差地亦步亦趨,而是存在一定幅度的彈性空間。從不同視閾來看,話語彈性空間表現(xiàn)為士人情感與情緒的不同趨向性空間、評騭尺度把握的游移性空間以及話語載體在文本風(fēng)格上的夸飾性空間。彈性空間的形成,從細(xì)節(jié)來看,有評騭者自身的種種動因,從根本來看,道德話語權(quán)的等差格局是其內(nèi)在支撐。
[Abstract]:The comment on stallion discourse is a regular way of expressing the moral integrity of Schilling in the early Qing Dynasty. In the Ming and Qing society dominated by Neo-Confucianism, the comment on the issue of "two ministers" can hardly be expressed against the general norms of the ethics of the monarch and minister. However, it is not the same as the ethical norms, but there is a certain extent of elastic space. From different perspectives, the discourse elasticity space is the different tendency space of the scholars' emotion and emotion. The floating space grasped by the stallion and the ostentatious space of the discourse carrier in the text style. The formation of the elastic space, from the details, there are all sorts of motives of the critics themselves, from the fundamental point of view. The isomorphism pattern of moral discourse right is its internal support.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號】：B82-051;K249
【正文快照】： 明清易代之際,士人在政治路向的二難選擇中氣節(jié)失守嚴(yán)重,形成了規(guī)模龐大的貳臣群體。“貳臣”是基于政治倫理的節(jié)操定讞,士林對于貳臣?xì)夤?jié)問題的歷史觀照,或是貳臣的自我審視,往往都會涉及到種種評騭話語的表達(dá)。在理學(xué)上升為國家意識形態(tài)的明清社會,君臣大節(jié)和華夷民族觀是士，

本文編號：1454277