發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-28 06:12

  本文選題：武陵地區(qū) + 土著��； 參考：《湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：隋唐五代時(shí)期武陵地區(qū)土著內(nèi)涵豐富,構(gòu)成復(fù)雜,他們與今天的土家族具有一定的歷史淵源,但不能等同于土家族;該時(shí)期客民以華夏為主,但包含部分"蠻民",故不能將他們視為漢族。與此同時(shí),"土/客"之間雖然存在文化上的差別,但并沒有嚴(yán)格的族群邊界。一些客民經(jīng)過發(fā)展,"反客為土",成了地方大姓巨族,并與土著"酋豪"爭(zhēng)奪地方的控制權(quán)。研究認(rèn)為,土家族以及武陵地區(qū)族群關(guān)系研究不能簡(jiǎn)單、僵化地溯源,而應(yīng)從國(guó)家與區(qū)域的視角,動(dòng)態(tài)、深入地分析土家族的形成、發(fā)展演變過程以及與其他族群之間的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:In the period of the Sui, Tang and Five Dynasties, the aborigines in the Five Dynasties were rich in connotation and complex, and they had a certain historical origin with today's Tujia nationality, but they could not be equated with the Tujia nationality. The people in this period were mainly Huaxia but included some "brunnpeople", so they could not be regarded as the Han nationality. There are strict ethnic boundaries. After the development of some of the guests, "the anti guest is the soil", the local family name giant and the indigenous "Emirates" are contended for the local control. It is believed that the study of the relationship between the Tujia and the Wuling ethnic groups can not be simple and rigid, but the formation of the Tujia people should be analyzed dynamically and deeply from the perspective of the country and the region. The evolution process and the relationship with other ethnic groups.

【作者單位】： 三峽大學(xué)民族學(xué)院;湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)編輯部;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“宋元以來武陵地區(qū)土客關(guān)系研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):11CMZ013) 國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“武陵民族地區(qū)的族際互動(dòng)與‘兩個(gè)共同'研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):13XMZ004)
【分類號(hào)】：K28

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王希輝;;武陵地區(qū)散雜居蒙古族的分布及來源[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2012年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1814109