本文選題：河南縣 + 蒙古族�。� 參考：《廈門大學(xué)》2009年博士論文

【摘要】： 變遷是文化發(fā)展實踐中的常數(shù),是一切文化的永恒現(xiàn)象。涵化是文化變遷的基本形式,導(dǎo)致文化涵化的原因多種多樣,它們對文化變遷的影響力也有大有小。蒙古族自13世紀(jì)中期進(jìn)入青海后,在七百多年的歷史進(jìn)程中,發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)了多態(tài)性局面。其中,進(jìn)入河南蒙古族自治縣的蒙古族,受國家的政治導(dǎo)向、精英階層的決策、族群之間的政治和話語權(quán)力關(guān)系消長以及生態(tài)環(huán)境的適應(yīng)等因素影響,在宗教認(rèn)同的基礎(chǔ)上,逐步開始藏文化的接受和認(rèn)同,逐漸改變或放棄了原先蒙古族的表層文化特征,但也保留著一些深層的蒙古族文化因子。論文從蒙藏歷史的接觸入手,通過對蒙藏關(guān)系史的簡單回溯,悉數(shù)蒙古族進(jìn)入青海的歷史過程、社會背景以及歷代影響青海蒙古族社會發(fā)展的重要歷史事件,重點回顧藏傳佛教格魯派(黃教)在蒙古族地區(qū)的傳播情形及盟旗制度在青海蒙古族的實施,從文化現(xiàn)象的表層嬗變和族群認(rèn)同的深層堅持兩方面對河南蒙古族自治縣蒙古族的文化變遷進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)考量。表層嬗變主要從河南蒙古族自治縣蒙古族社會政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)制度的演變、對藏傳佛教的皈依以及婚俗、服飾、語言、日常習(xí)俗的轉(zhuǎn)變等方面進(jìn)行描述,深層堅持則從自治縣的成立、蒙古包的延續(xù)、那達(dá)慕的恢復(fù)等原生文化的重構(gòu)以及族群認(rèn)同等方面予以考察。通過對河南蒙古族自治縣蒙古族社會文化變遷的分析,指出當(dāng)?shù)孛晒抛咫m然在文化認(rèn)同上表現(xiàn)出了對藏文化的接受,但在族群身份認(rèn)同上多數(shù)人保留了強烈的蒙古民族意識,而部分蒙古族則表現(xiàn)出模棱兩可的態(tài)度。由此認(rèn)為,族群認(rèn)同具有多重表述特征,表現(xiàn)在情感認(rèn)同、場景認(rèn)同以及矛盾的心理認(rèn)同上。在族群互動的過程中,文化涵化所導(dǎo)致的族群表層客觀文化特征的消失并不意味族群認(rèn)同的單一,族群不是固定不變的,因而族群認(rèn)同也將呈現(xiàn)出動態(tài)的變化過程。
[Abstract]:Change is the constant in the practice of cultural development and the eternal phenomenon of all cultures. Acculturation is the basic form of cultural change. After entering Qinghai in the middle of the 13th century, the Mongolian people have developed polymorphic in the historical process of more than 700 years. Among them, the Mongolian people who entered Henan Mongolian Autonomous County are influenced by the political guidance of the state, the decision-making of the elite, the growth and decline of the political and discourse power relations among the ethnic groups, and the adaptation of the ecological environment, etc., on the basis of religious identity. Gradually began to accept and identify with Tibetan culture, gradually changed or abandoned the original Mongolian surface cultural characteristics, but also retained some deep-seated Mongolian cultural factors. This paper begins with the historical contact between Mongolia and Tibet, through a brief retrospect of the history of Mongolian-Tibetan relations, the historical process, social background and important historical events affecting the development of Mongolian society in Qinghai. Focusing on the propagation of the Gruffian sect of Tibetan Buddhism (Yellow sect) in the Mongolian region and the implementation of the Union Banner system in the Mongolian nationality of Qinghai, The cultural changes of Mongolian nationality in Henan Mongolian Autonomous County are considered in detail from the surface evolution of cultural phenomena and the deep persistence of ethnic identity. The evolution of the surface layer is mainly from the evolution of the Mongolian social politics and economic system, the conversion of Tibetan Buddhism and the transformation of marriage custom, dress, language, daily custom, etc. The deep persistence is investigated from the following aspects: the establishment of autonomous county, the continuation of yurts, the restoration of Natamu's original culture and ethnic identity. Through the analysis of Mongolian social and cultural changes in Henan Mongolian Autonomous County, it is pointed out that although the local Mongolian people have shown their acceptance of Tibetan culture in their cultural identity, most of them have retained a strong Mongolian national consciousness in their ethnic identity. Some of the Mongols showed an ambiguous attitude. It is concluded that ethnic identity is characterized by multiple expressions, such as emotional identity, scene identity and ambivalent psychological identity. In the process of ethnic interaction, the disappearance of the objective cultural characteristics of ethnic groups caused by cultural acculturation does not mean that ethnic identity is single and ethnic groups are not fixed, so ethnic identity will also show a dynamic process of change.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：K28

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李祥福;族群性研究的相關(guān)概念與基本理論[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2000年05期

2 周大鳴;論族群與族群關(guān)系[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

3 蘭林友;論族群與族群認(rèn)同理論[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

4 范可;中西文語境的“族群”與“民族”[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

5 潘蛟;“族群”及其相關(guān)概念在西方的流變[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年05期

6 梁茂春;論族群內(nèi)部的異質(zhì)性:以廣西大瑤山為例[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

7 弗里德里克·巴斯,高崇,周大鳴,李遠(yuǎn)龍;族群與邊界[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1999年01期

8 石峰;“文化變遷”研究狀況概述[J];貴州民族研究;1998年04期

9 饒旭鵬;民族文化變遷研究20年——研究現(xiàn)狀與存在問題[J];貴州民族研究;2005年04期

10 陳心林;;族群理論與中國的民族研究[J];貴州民族研究;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1814064