抗戰(zhàn)勝利后蘇聯(lián)延緩撤兵問題的國民政府因素研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-10 19:56
【摘要】：根據(jù)《雅爾塔協(xié)定》,1945年8月9日蘇聯(lián)出兵東北對日作戰(zhàn)。1945年8月15日,日本宣布無條件投降。蘇聯(lián)延緩東北撤兵,是指根據(jù)1945年8月14日《中蘇友好同盟條約》之規(guī)定,蘇聯(lián)將于日本投降后三個星期內(nèi)開始撤退,三個月內(nèi)撤回蘇聯(lián)境內(nèi),而到了撤兵期限時,蘇軍曾兩度延緩撤兵,(國民政府提出的第三次延緩撤兵請求未能實現(xiàn)),直到1946年5月3日,蘇軍才全部撤出東北。那么,出現(xiàn)這種情況,原因是多方面的,有蘇聯(lián)自身的原因,有中國境內(nèi)(包括國民黨和共產(chǎn)黨)的原因,也有美國為主的國際其他勢力的原因。多種原因之間,是相互聯(lián)系、相互影響的。而國民政府作為當(dāng)時中國的合法政府,也是締結(jié)《中蘇友好同盟條約》的中國一方,曾三次提出延緩撤兵請求,究竟是處于何種考慮呢? 本文主要從國民政府方面入手,兼顧其他“三方”,通過研究整個延緩撤兵的過程,分析蘇聯(lián)延緩撤兵的國民政府方面的主要因素。全文共分為四章,第一章主要介紹蘇聯(lián)出兵的背景及原因,無論是《雅爾塔協(xié)定》和美國求援為蘇聯(lián)出兵提供了理由,還是《中蘇友好同盟條約》使蘇聯(lián)出兵有了依據(jù),但最終自身利益需要才是蘇聯(lián)出兵的根本原因。第二章主要介紹國民政府三次請求蘇聯(lián)延緩撤兵的情況。第一次是由于國民政府兵力不及為接收東北爭取時間。第二次為經(jīng)濟(jì)合作蘇聯(lián)迫使國民政府請求延緩撤兵。第三次國民政府與蘇聯(lián)矛盾激化導(dǎo)致其提出第三次延緩撤兵的要求被拒絕,最終蘇軍自行撤兵使得國民政府接收困難。第三章主要從國民政府方面分析蘇聯(lián)延緩撤兵的主要原因。我認(rèn)為主要是親美政策,表現(xiàn)在,其請求美國幫助運兵東北,之后又以美國壓蘇聯(lián)迫其撤兵。最后總體分析國民政府的親美反共政策導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果。第四章主要講因為國民政府實施親美政策,才有國統(tǒng)區(qū)1946年春反蘇大游行。這使得蘇聯(lián)喪失了對國民政府的信任,便迅速撤離東北,拉起了國共內(nèi)戰(zhàn)的序幕。 本文利用回憶錄、文獻(xiàn)、報刊資料等原始資料,參考所能收集到的國內(nèi)外研究成果,從多角度、多方面利用政治學(xué)和歷史學(xué)的理論方法,在對蘇聯(lián)出兵的背景及國民政府三次提出延緩撤兵的過程進(jìn)行的歷史考察的基礎(chǔ)上,對蘇聯(lián)延緩撤兵的國民政府方面的因素進(jìn)行深刻的分析。
[Abstract]:According to the Yalta Agreement, the Soviet Union sent troops to fight against Japan on August 9, 1945. On August 15, 1945, Japan declared unconditional surrender. According to the provisions of the Treaty of Friendship between China and the Soviet Union of 14 August 1945, the Soviet Union will begin to withdraw within three weeks of Japan's surrender, and within three months, the Soviet Union will withdraw its troops from the Soviet Union, and when the time limit for the withdrawal of troops is reached, The Soviet army delayed the withdrawal twice (the national government's third request for a postponement was not fulfilled), and it was not until May 3, 1946 that all the troops were withdrawn from the north-east. Well, there are many reasons for this situation. There are reasons for the Soviet Union itself, for reasons within China (including the Kuomintang and the Communist Party), and for other international forces dominated by the United States. A variety of reasons are interrelated and interacted with each other. And as the legitimate government of China at that time, and also the Chinese side that concluded the Treaty of Friendship and Alliance between China and the Soviet Union, what kind of consideration did the Nationalist Government put forward three times to postpone the withdrawal of troops? This article mainly from the national government aspect, taking into account the other "three parties", through the study of the whole process of delaying the withdrawal of troops, analysis of the Soviet Union delayed withdrawal of the main factors of the national government. The full text is divided into four chapters, the first chapter mainly introduces the background and reasons for the Soviet Union to send troops, whether it is the Yalta Agreement and the United States seeking assistance to provide reasons for the Soviet Union to send troops, or the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance has given the Soviet Union a basis for sending troops. But the ultimate need for self-interest was the root cause of the Soviet Union's military presence. The second chapter mainly introduces the situation that the national government asked the Soviet Union to delay the withdrawal of troops three times. The first was because the national government was not strong enough to buy time to take over the north-east. For the second time, the Soviet Union forced the national government to request a postponement of the withdrawal of troops. The contradiction between the third national government and the Soviet Union was intensified, which led to the rejection of its request to delay the withdrawal of troops for the third time. Finally, the withdrawal of the Soviet army itself made it difficult for the national government to accept. The third chapter mainly analyzes the main reasons why the Soviet Union delayed the withdrawal of troops from the national government. I think it is mainly a pro-American policy, as shown by its request to the United States to help the North East, and then the U. S. pressure on the Soviet Union to withdraw its troops. Finally, the overall analysis of the national government's pro-American anti-Communist policy results. The fourth chapter is mainly about the anti-Soviet march in the spring of 1946 because of the pro-American policy implemented by the national government. This caused the Soviet Union to lose trust in the national government and quickly withdrew from the north-east, opening the prelude to the KMT-CCP civil war. This paper makes use of the original materials such as memoirs, literature, newspapers and periodicals, referring to the research results collected at home and abroad, and making use of the theoretical methods of politics and history from many angles and aspects. On the basis of the historical investigation on the background of Soviet Union sending troops and the three times put forward by the national government to delay the withdrawal of troops, this paper makes a deep analysis of the factors of the national government which is delaying the withdrawal of troops in the Soviet Union.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K266
本文編號：2456081
[Abstract]:According to the Yalta Agreement, the Soviet Union sent troops to fight against Japan on August 9, 1945. On August 15, 1945, Japan declared unconditional surrender. According to the provisions of the Treaty of Friendship between China and the Soviet Union of 14 August 1945, the Soviet Union will begin to withdraw within three weeks of Japan's surrender, and within three months, the Soviet Union will withdraw its troops from the Soviet Union, and when the time limit for the withdrawal of troops is reached, The Soviet army delayed the withdrawal twice (the national government's third request for a postponement was not fulfilled), and it was not until May 3, 1946 that all the troops were withdrawn from the north-east. Well, there are many reasons for this situation. There are reasons for the Soviet Union itself, for reasons within China (including the Kuomintang and the Communist Party), and for other international forces dominated by the United States. A variety of reasons are interrelated and interacted with each other. And as the legitimate government of China at that time, and also the Chinese side that concluded the Treaty of Friendship and Alliance between China and the Soviet Union, what kind of consideration did the Nationalist Government put forward three times to postpone the withdrawal of troops? This article mainly from the national government aspect, taking into account the other "three parties", through the study of the whole process of delaying the withdrawal of troops, analysis of the Soviet Union delayed withdrawal of the main factors of the national government. The full text is divided into four chapters, the first chapter mainly introduces the background and reasons for the Soviet Union to send troops, whether it is the Yalta Agreement and the United States seeking assistance to provide reasons for the Soviet Union to send troops, or the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance has given the Soviet Union a basis for sending troops. But the ultimate need for self-interest was the root cause of the Soviet Union's military presence. The second chapter mainly introduces the situation that the national government asked the Soviet Union to delay the withdrawal of troops three times. The first was because the national government was not strong enough to buy time to take over the north-east. For the second time, the Soviet Union forced the national government to request a postponement of the withdrawal of troops. The contradiction between the third national government and the Soviet Union was intensified, which led to the rejection of its request to delay the withdrawal of troops for the third time. Finally, the withdrawal of the Soviet army itself made it difficult for the national government to accept. The third chapter mainly analyzes the main reasons why the Soviet Union delayed the withdrawal of troops from the national government. I think it is mainly a pro-American policy, as shown by its request to the United States to help the North East, and then the U. S. pressure on the Soviet Union to withdraw its troops. Finally, the overall analysis of the national government's pro-American anti-Communist policy results. The fourth chapter is mainly about the anti-Soviet march in the spring of 1946 because of the pro-American policy implemented by the national government. This caused the Soviet Union to lose trust in the national government and quickly withdrew from the north-east, opening the prelude to the KMT-CCP civil war. This paper makes use of the original materials such as memoirs, literature, newspapers and periodicals, referring to the research results collected at home and abroad, and making use of the theoretical methods of politics and history from many angles and aspects. On the basis of the historical investigation on the background of Soviet Union sending troops and the three times put forward by the national government to delay the withdrawal of troops, this paper makes a deep analysis of the factors of the national government which is delaying the withdrawal of troops in the Soviet Union.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K266
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 路文娟;1945年8月-1946年4月蘇聯(lián)對中國東北政策的研究[J];鞍山科技大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年05期
2 周重禮;;蘇聯(lián)出兵東北前后[J];文史天地;2005年08期
3 沈志華;;斯大林與中國內(nèi)戰(zhàn)的起源(1945～1946)[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2008年10期
4 薛銜天,劉成元;蘇聯(lián)與東北革命根據(jù)地[J];中共黨史研究;2005年01期
，本文編號：2456081
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2456081.html
