【摘要】： 郭嵩燾(1818-1891)是晚清著名的政治活動(dòng)家、外交家。但不僅僅如此,郭還是一位學(xué)養(yǎng)深厚的學(xué)者、思想家。關(guān)于學(xué)人的郭嵩燾,當(dāng)今的學(xué)界矚目無(wú)多。 本論文即擬以郭的學(xué)術(shù)撰述《禮記質(zhì)疑》、《中庸質(zhì)疑》、《大學(xué)章句質(zhì)疑》(下稱(chēng)“三《質(zhì)疑》”)為對(duì)象做一整體分析,探究郭嵩燾經(jīng)學(xué)的“時(shí)代特色”,即一方面看其經(jīng)學(xué)在晚清經(jīng)學(xué)流變中的地位和作用；另一方面考察其作為一整體的思想如何與現(xiàn)實(shí)關(guān)懷相互聯(lián)系,如何從學(xué)術(shù)的角度闡發(fā)“以禮為治”的目的,如何通過(guò)“循理”、“尊禮”來(lái)“通經(jīng)致用”于“三千年未有之變局”。本文共分三章： 第一章：緒論部分簡(jiǎn)介了郭嵩燾的生平經(jīng)歷及著作,綜述了目前的研究現(xiàn)狀、闡述了撰寫(xiě)此文的目的及研究意義。 第二章：從三《質(zhì)疑》的整體角度出發(fā),總結(jié)郭氏的治經(jīng)、治禮的特點(diǎn)與方法。析出郭嵩燾從當(dāng)下的時(shí)局出發(fā),認(rèn)真思考,不迷信、不盲從,對(duì)程朱、陸王之學(xué)都提出了質(zhì)疑、評(píng)判,是對(duì)清末理學(xué)的否定之否定,是對(duì)程朱之學(xué)的再發(fā)展。面對(duì)清末統(tǒng)治危機(jī),郭嵩燾主張從學(xué)術(shù)入手,規(guī)范人心。他治學(xué)一方面不離“求真”,一方面不忘“致用”。他研治禮學(xué),正是為了“正人心風(fēng)俗”,達(dá)到“天下大治”的“致用”目的的。 第三章：郭嵩燾之研究禮制,他雙目?jī)梢?一心二用：一只眼盯著《禮記》,一只眼瞄著現(xiàn)實(shí)。他認(rèn)為,今世相為法守的禮本不是三代之禮,它是摻和了鄭玄的思想,而朱熹又在鄭氏的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步推衍的結(jié)果。郭氏本人制禮的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一,再加上傳統(tǒng)之禮與現(xiàn)代之禮的沖突,使郭嵩燾的“以禮為治”的思想在晚清經(jīng)學(xué)流變的浪潮中,處于一種十分尷尬的境況。郭嵩燾通過(guò)疑禮、制禮、習(xí)禮、踐禮,對(duì)禮有不同的體認(rèn)與理解,形成了系統(tǒng)的禮學(xué)觀點(diǎn)。針對(duì)“禮、理之辨”,郭氏認(rèn)為不可偏廢,試圖調(diào)和漢宋異同,“理”“禮”并重,力求挽救瀕于衰退的經(jīng)學(xué),雖然其質(zhì)疑鄭玄、程朱,對(duì)《禮記》經(jīng)文進(jìn)行了合乎當(dāng)下的解釋,他的努力在某些方面也起了一定的作用,但仍不能阻擋經(jīng)學(xué)的蛻變。
[Abstract]:Guo Songtao (1818-1891) was a famous political activist and diplomat in the late Qing Dynasty. But not only that, Guo is also a profound scholar, thinker. As for the scholar Guo Songtao, there is little attention in the academic circles today. This thesis aims to make an overall analysis of Guo's academic writings "questioning of the Rites", "the mean doubt" and "University Chapter query" (hereinafter referred to as "three questions") to explore the "characteristics of the times" of Guo Songtao's classics. On the one hand, it looks at the position and function of its classics in the evolution of the late Qing Dynasty; On the other hand, it examines how its thought as a whole is related to realistic concern, how to expound the purpose of "ruling by courtesy" from an academic point of view, and how to "follow the principle" through "following the principle". Honorific "to use" in the "three thousand years have not changed". This paper is divided into three chapters: chapter one: the introduction introduces Guo Songtao's life experience and works, summarizes the current research situation, and expounds the purpose and significance of writing this paper. The second chapter summarizes the characteristics and methods of Guo's treatment from the whole angle of "questioning". From the current situation, Guo Songtao seriously pondered, did not believe, did not blindly follow. He questioned and judged Cheng Zhu's and Lu Wang's studies, which was a negation of Neo-Confucianism in the late Qing Dynasty and a re-development of Cheng-Zhu's studies. Facing the crisis of rule in the late Qing Dynasty, Guo Songtao advocated starting from the academic and standardizing the hearts of the people. On the one hand, he does not leave "seeking truth", on the other hand, he does not forget to "apply". He studied etiquette for the sake of "correct people's customs" and achieve the purpose of "applying the rule of the world". The third chapter: Guo Songtao's study of etiquette, he has two eyes and two uses: one eye is staring at the Book of Rites, the other is looking at the reality. In his view, the present life is not a three-generation ritual, it is a blend of Zheng Xuan's thought, and Zhu Xi on the basis of Zheng further promoted the result. In addition to the conflict between the traditional etiquette and the modern etiquette, Guo Songtao's thought of "ruling by courtesy" was in a very awkward situation in the tide of the evolution of the late Qing Dynasty's Confucian classics study in the late Qing Dynasty, in which the standards of his own formative ceremony were not uniform, together with the conflict between the traditional etiquette and the modern etiquette. Guo Songtao formed a systematic view of etiquette by questioning ceremony, making ceremony, practicing ceremony, and having different recognition and understanding of etiquette. In view of "Li, the differentiation of reason", Guo considered that it could not be ignored, trying to reconcile the similarities and differences between the Han and Song dynasties, "Li" and "courtesy", striving to save the dying classics, although he questioned Zheng Xuan and Cheng Zhu, His efforts have also played a certain role in some aspects, but he still can not stop the evolution of the study of Confucian classics. The present interpretation of the Book of Rites is in line with the present time, and his efforts have also played a role in some aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K252

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙倩倩;清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)系年考—咸同光宣時(shí)期[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2448427