發(fā)布時間：2018-12-15 07:21

【摘要】：1935年到1941年是中共對美政策的起步階段。日本的全面侵華為中共的發(fā)展提供了有利條件,中共一面呼吁停止內(nèi)戰(zhàn),實行國共合作,共同抗日,一面加強(qiáng)國際宣傳,主動接受美國等西方記者的采訪,向世界宣傳中共,并表達(dá)了建立以美國為主要成員的反日國際統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的愿望。中共在抗日戰(zhàn)爭初期提出加強(qiáng)與美國接觸,以及呼吁建立以美國為主要對象的反日國際統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線,就是希望在自身力量相對較弱的情況下,利用美國與日本在太平洋地區(qū)的矛盾沖突,以及美國與南京國民政府之間的關(guān)系,實現(xiàn)美國支持中國抗戰(zhàn),抵制國民黨發(fā)動的反共活動,遏制國內(nèi)的投降情緒,促使反日戰(zhàn)爭取得勝利,結(jié)束國民黨的一黨統(tǒng)治,進(jìn)而在中國建立新民主主義,獲得執(zhí)政地位的目的。 而另一方面,中共又時刻警惕抗戰(zhàn)時期可能出現(xiàn)的美日妥協(xié)以及美國支持國民黨反共降日的行為。如1939年中期,由于美國對日本采取了緩和關(guān)系的措施,并與英國等西方國家積極鼓吹召開“太平洋會議”,中共加大了對美國綏靖政策的批評,而1941初的美日談判也引起了中共的高度警惕。中共認(rèn)為,美日談判是美日蔣三方共同醞釀的企圖犧牲太平洋各民族的利益,尤其是蘇聯(lián)的利益,以換取與日本的暫時性妥協(xié)的東方慕尼黑新陰謀。因此,中共再一次重申了獨(dú)立自主和自力更生在抗戰(zhàn)中的重要性,并認(rèn)為把抗戰(zhàn)寄希望于美日在太平洋上的沖突是不合實際的。 在中共對美態(tài)度的問題上,蘇聯(lián)對中共的影響也是不可忽視的,甚至可以說蘇聯(lián)的外交政策直接決定了中共的對美政策。中共一直與蘇聯(lián)有著緊密的聯(lián)系,并且在抗戰(zhàn)時期也一直緊跟蘇聯(lián)步伐。蘇聯(lián)作為一個橫跨歐亞大陸的國家,一直希望能夠與英美等西方國家建立集體安全體系,因此,在抗戰(zhàn)爆發(fā)初期,蘇聯(lián)將德意日看作是法西斯國家,并積極呼吁各國建立反法西斯人民戰(zhàn)線。不僅如此,蘇聯(lián)還制定了對華方針,將支持中國的抗日戰(zhàn)爭,利用中國拖住日本,以維護(hù)蘇聯(lián)的遠(yuǎn)東安全作為蘇聯(lián)對華政策的基本方針。蘇聯(lián)的對外政策促使中共加強(qiáng)了與美國的接觸。之后蘇聯(lián)由于集體安全體制受挫,于1939年8月23日與德國簽署了《蘇德互不侵犯條約》,這一條約的簽訂促使蘇聯(lián)將二戰(zhàn)的性質(zhì)定為“帝國主義的非正義的戰(zhàn)爭”。隨后,中共暫時放棄了國際反法西斯統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線政策。1941年6月11日,德國發(fā)動對蘇聯(lián)的進(jìn)攻,蘇德戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā)改變了蘇聯(lián)對二戰(zhàn)性質(zhì)的看法,并將德意日法西斯國家作為當(dāng)前最主要的敵人,重新提出擱置多年的建立世界反法西斯統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的主張。而中共也重新確立了宣傳基調(diào),將二戰(zhàn)的性質(zhì)由帝國主義間相互斗爭的戰(zhàn)爭改變?yōu)榉ㄎ魉古c反法西斯兩大陣營間的斗爭,并重新提出與英美等國合作,共建國際反法西斯統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線。
[Abstract]:1935-1941 was the initial stage of the Chinese Communists' policy towards the United States. Japan's full-scale invasion of China has provided favorable conditions for the development of the Chinese Communists. On the one hand, the Chinese Communists called for an end to the civil war, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party cooperated to jointly resist Japan, on the other hand, they stepped up international propaganda, took the initiative to give interviews to Western journalists such as the United States, and publicized the CPC to And expressed the desire to establish an anti-Japanese international United front with the United States as the main member. In the early days of the War of Resistance against Japan, the Chinese Communists proposed to strengthen contacts with the United States and to call for the establishment of an international United front against Japan, the main object of which was the United States, in the hope that under the circumstances of its relatively weak strength, By taking advantage of the contradictions and conflicts between the United States and Japan in the Pacific region and the relations between the United States and the Nanjing National Government, the United States has realized that the United States supports China's anti-Japanese war, boycotted anti-Communist activities launched by the Kuomintang, and contained the domestic surrender mood. The purpose of promoting the victory of the anti-Japanese war, ending the one-party rule of the Kuomintang, and establishing the new democracy in China and gaining the ruling position. On the other hand, the Chinese Communists are always on guard against the possible compromise between the United States and Japan during the War of Resistance against Japan and the actions of the United States in support of the Kuomintang's anti-communist surrender to Japan. For example, in mid-1939, because the United States took measures to ease relations with Japan and actively advocated the "Pacific Conference" with Britain and other Western countries, the Chinese Communists intensified their criticism of the United States appeasement policy. And the US and Japan negotiations in early 1941 also aroused the high vigilance of the Chinese Communists. The Chinese Communists held that the US-Japan talks were a joint attempt by the three parties of the United States, Japan and Chiang Kai-shek to sacrifice the interests of the Pacific nations, especially the interests of the Soviet Union, in exchange for a new plot of temporary compromise with Japan in Eastern Munich. Therefore, the Chinese Communists once again reaffirmed the importance of independence and self-reliance in the War of Resistance, and held that it was unrealistic to place the hope of the War of Resistance on the conflict between the United States and Japan in the Pacific Ocean. On the issue of the Chinese Communists' attitude to the United States, the Soviet Union's influence on the Chinese Communists cannot be ignored, and it can even be said that the Soviet Union's foreign policy directly determines the Chinese Communists' policy towards the United States. The Chinese Communists have been closely linked with the Soviet Union and followed the Soviet Union during the War of Resistance. As a country spanning Eurasia, the Soviet Union had always hoped to establish a collective security system with Western countries such as the United States and the United States. Therefore, at the beginning of the War of Resistance, the Soviet Union regarded Germany, Italy and Japan as fascist countries. And actively called on all countries to establish an anti-fascist people's front. Not only that, the Soviet Union also formulated a policy toward China, which will support China's anti-Japanese war, use China to stall Japan, and maintain the security of the far East of the Soviet Union as the basic policy of the Soviet Union's China policy. The Soviet Union's foreign policy prompted the Chinese Communists to strengthen their contacts with the United States. As a result of the defeat of the collective security system, the Soviet Union signed the "Soviet-German Non-Aggression Treaty" with Germany on August 23, 1939, which prompted the Soviet Union to define the nature of World War II as "imperialist and unjust war." Subsequently, the Chinese Communists temporarily abandoned the international anti-fascist United front policy. On June 11, 1941, Germany launched an attack on the Soviet Union, and the outbreak of the Soviet-German War changed the Soviet Union's view of the nature of World War II. Germany, Italy and Japan were regarded as the main enemies at present, and put forward the idea of setting up the world anti-fascist United front which had been shelved for many years. The Chinese Communists also re-established the tone of propaganda, changing the nature of World War II from a war of imperialist struggle to a struggle between fascist and anti-fascist camps, and reproposing cooperation with Britain and the United States and other countries. Work together to build an international anti-fascist United front.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K265;D231

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣曉鐘;;安徽省紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利四十周年學(xué)術(shù)討論會綜述[J];安徽史學(xué);1985年05期

2 田式祖;;陳獨(dú)秀抗日主張述評[J];阜陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社科版);1985年02期

3 周濤;;坂坡村[J];上海文學(xué);1987年11期

4 朱培民;;第四講 全民族的抗日戰(zhàn)爭[J];實事求是;1990年S1期

5 張騰霄;全民抗戰(zhàn)和全民教育——為紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利50周年而作[J];教育研究;1995年08期

6 ;“梨園杯”紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利50周年漫畫展在京展出[J];美術(shù);1995年11期

7 王真;中國共產(chǎn)黨是抗日戰(zhàn)爭的中流砥柱──海軍政治學(xué)院紀(jì)念抗戰(zhàn)勝利五十周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會綜述紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利五十周年[J];政工學(xué)刊;1995年09期

8 鄭瑯;為了永久的和平──記中國人民抗日戰(zhàn)爭紀(jì)念館[J];中外文化交流;1995年04期

9 林素云;銘記歷史,珍惜未來——紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利五十周年[J];長春大學(xué)學(xué)報;1995年02期

10 金帆;李煥之;;指點江山望未來(歌唱抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利和反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭勝利五十周年)[J];音樂創(chuàng)作;1995年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 ;芮杏文同志的講話[A];上海市新四軍暨華中抗日根據(jù)地歷史研究會第二屆年會紀(jì)念特刊[C];1985年

2 戴水生;;沔陽在抗日戰(zhàn)爭中的歷史功績[A];湖北抗戰(zhàn)——紀(jì)念中國抗日戰(zhàn)爭和世界反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭勝利50周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];1995年

3 白元龍;;“鄂西會戰(zhàn)”初探[A];湖北抗戰(zhàn)——紀(jì)念中國抗日戰(zhàn)爭和世界反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭勝利50周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];1995年

4 宋民康;;回憶我在抗日戰(zhàn)爭中的斗爭[A];鐵流12——紀(jì)念新四軍成立70周年[C];2007年

5 ;附：本會第二屆年會征文目錄[A];上海市新四軍暨華中抗日根據(jù)地歷史研究會第二屆年會紀(jì)念特刊[C];1985年

6 王維禮;高二音;;論抗日戰(zhàn)爭的開端[A];抗日戰(zhàn)爭史論文集——中國現(xiàn)代史學(xué)會第四、五次學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文選[C];1987年

7 夏征農(nóng);;牢記抗日戰(zhàn)爭的歷史經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn)[A];上海市新四軍暨華中抗日根據(jù)地歷史研究會第六屆會員代表大會紀(jì)念特刊[C];2002年

8 楊凡;;緬懷歷史 開創(chuàng)未來——在紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利暨安邊起義60周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會上的講話[A];曹又參與安邊起義——紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利暨安邊起義六十周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2005年

9 ;血鑄長城——海峽兩岸老軍人紀(jì)念抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利六十周年f鴘k展[A];萬里長城暨中國長城學(xué)會優(yōu)秀文集[C];2005年

10 楊青;;抗日戰(zhàn)爭最后階段的戰(zhàn)斗——回憶寶應(yīng)戰(zhàn)斗[A];紀(jì)念抗戰(zhàn)暨世界反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭勝利60周年文集[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 張海鵬;從民族復(fù)興的角度認(rèn)識抗日戰(zhàn)爭勝利的歷史意義[N];中國社會科學(xué)院院報;2005年

2 張居正 李芳;我省僑界召開“華僑與抗日戰(zhàn)爭”研討會[N];云南政協(xié)報;2005年

3 榮維木;中國現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程的中斷與接續(xù)[N];學(xué)習(xí)時報;2007年

4 記者 馮建長;中金黃金開展“七一”主題紀(jì)念活動[N];中國黃金報;2007年

5 謝朝龍　劉學(xué)t，

本文編號：2380240