【摘要】：1931年9月18日,日本帝國主義發(fā)動了侵略中國東北的“九·一八”事變。由于國民黨政府采取“攘外必先安內(nèi)”的方針,實行不抵抗政策,沒有對日本侵略東三省的可恥行徑給予有效的軍事打擊,采用有效的方法收回中國被日本帝國主義非法侵占的權(quán)益,反而在外交方面寄希望于國聯(lián),企圖依賴國聯(lián)來解決中日沖突。1931年9月21日中國駐國際聯(lián)盟代表施肇基,根據(jù)國聯(lián)盟約第14條,正式向國際聯(lián)盟提出申訴,控告日本帝國主義侵略中國領(lǐng)土,破壞國聯(lián)盟約。要求國聯(lián)“立即采取辦法,使危害國際和平局勢不致擴(kuò)大”,使中國東北局勢恢復(fù)到事變前的狀態(tài),并由日本賠償中國的損失。國際聯(lián)盟接受了中國政府得申訴。于1932年組成了以李頓為團(tuán)長的國聯(lián)調(diào)查團(tuán),開始調(diào)查中日沖突。當(dāng)時的中國新聞界以極大的愛國熱情高度關(guān)注著事態(tài)的發(fā)展,《申報》、《大公報》、《國聞周報》、《東方雜志》、《獨立評論》、等報刊,不斷緊跟事態(tài)發(fā)展步伐,發(fā)表評論,代表了中國新聞界對國聯(lián)調(diào)查團(tuán)及其報告書的深刻認(rèn)識;中國共產(chǎn)黨方面《紅色中華》、《斗爭》、《蘇區(qū)工人》等報刊,在中國共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,以全新的視角和高度,對國聯(lián)調(diào)查團(tuán)及其包告訴給予全新評價,在當(dāng)時發(fā)出了時代的強音。
[Abstract]:On September 18 th, 1931, Japanese imperialism launched the September 18 th incident of aggression against northeast China. Since the Kuomintang government has adopted the policy of "making peace before others" and has implemented a policy of non-resistance, it has not given an effective military strike against Japan's shameful acts of aggression against the three eastern provinces. Using effective methods to recover China's rights and interests illegally encroached upon by Japanese imperialists, on the contrary, they placed their hopes on the League of Nations in the diplomatic field and attempted to rely on the League of Nations to resolve the Sino-Japanese conflict. On 21 September 1931, China's representative to the League of Nations, Shi Zhaoji, In accordance with article 14 of the League of Nations covenants, a formal complaint was lodged with the League of Nations accusing Japanese imperialism of invading Chinese territory and undermining the League of Nations covenants. He demanded that the League of Nations "immediately take measures to ensure that the situation endangering international peace does not expand," and that the situation in northeast China be restored to the state it was before the incident, and that Japan compensate China for its losses. The League of Nations accepted the Chinese government's appeal. In 1932, a League of Nations mission headed by Leighton was formed to investigate the Sino-Japanese conflict. At that time, the Chinese press, with great patriotic enthusiasm, paid high attention to the development of the situation. The "Declaration", "Ta Kung Pao", "National News Weekly", "Oriental magazine", "Independent Review", and other newspapers and periodicals kept up with the development of the situation. The comments represent a profound understanding of the League of Nations Mission and its report by the Chinese press. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, "Red China", "struggle", "Soviet Workers" and other newspapers and periodicals, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, and from a new perspective and height, the League of Nations's fact-finding mission and its package were given a new appraisal. At that time the sound of the times was strong.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：G219.29;K264

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周美云;;重評李頓調(diào)查團(tuán)報告書[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1992年03期

2 李淑娟;“九一八”事變后國聯(lián)調(diào)處活動評析[J];北方論叢;2001年03期

3 金光耀,朱利;《李頓文件》所見之李頓中國之行[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

4 朱利;李頓赴華調(diào)查中國事件期間致其妻子信件(上)[J];民國檔案;2002年02期

5 朱利;李頓赴華調(diào)查中國事件期間致其妻子信件(下)[J];民國檔案;2002年03期

6 王啟華;李頓赴華調(diào)查中國事件期間日記[J];民國檔案;2002年04期

7 劉成厚;在國際聯(lián)盟會議上中日外交官的較量[J];貴州文史天地;1995年05期

8 蔣超群;;對國際聯(lián)盟調(diào)解“九一八事變”中日沖突的再認(rèn)識[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2006年12期

9 阮君華;評“九一八事變”后英美兩國的遠(yuǎn)東政策[J];江海學(xué)刊;2001年05期

10 劉建武;有關(guān)日本侵占東北后國際聯(lián)盟調(diào)處的幾個問題[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭研究;1992年01期

，

本文編號：2302368