立憲與革命兩派的國(guó)民程度論及其政體選擇
[Abstract]:Whether in the late Qing Dynasty or the early Republic of China, the national level was an urgent concern for intellectuals at that time. After summing up the experience of the failure of the political movement, the intellectuals come to the conclusion that the national level is too low, that is, the knowledge level of the people is low, the national consciousness is lacking, and the basic qualities needed for modern politics are not available. The negative consciousness and behavior of the people are the important reasons for the failure of the campaign to save the country and seek strength. China needs citizens with constitutional competence. Constitutionalism advocates constitutional monarchy and opposes democratic republic, one of the reasons is that the national level is not enough. The revolutionaries believe that the democratic republic system is the general trend of human political civilization, the revolution can solve the problem of insufficient national level, China should transform the feudal monarchy into the democratic republic system through revolution. To this end, the two sides in the Xinmin Cong newspaper and the people's newspaper launched a major debate. The debate seemed to end with a victory for democratic republicanism, but the lack of citizenship did not solve the problem. After the Republic of China was destroyed, the re-examination of the national level triggered the "New Culture Movement". Reflecting on people's understanding of the issue of national level at that time, we can see that the academic tradition of "only attaching importance to practicality" has led to a tendency of academic development in modern China. Utilitarian scholarship leads to utilitarian politics. The different understanding of the national level affected the regime choice of revolutionaries and constitutionalists, and then exerted an unnegligible influence on the political system reform in the late Qing Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:D691;K257
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 湯奇學(xué);晚清政治思想超前發(fā)展述論[J];安徽史學(xué);2004年01期
2 劉光永;國(guó)民公德與憲政框架——梁?jiǎn)⒊恼挝拿髡w發(fā)展觀[J];安徽史學(xué);2004年04期
3 劉仁坤;劉興華;;論孫中山國(guó)民性改造問(wèn)題[J];北方論叢;2006年03期
4 梁家貴;1905年前后資產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命派的改造國(guó)民性思想及其演變[J];濱州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期
5 馬少華;從“民心”到“人民程度”[J];讀書(shū);1998年10期
6 俞祖華,趙慧峰;近代來(lái)華西方人對(duì)中國(guó)國(guó)民性的評(píng)析[J];東岳論叢;2002年01期
7 許紀(jì)霖;;從尋求富強(qiáng)到文明自覺(jué)——清末民初強(qiáng)國(guó)夢(mèng)的歷史嬗變[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期
8 林家有,趙立彬;論嚴(yán)復(fù)的“三民思想”[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年04期
9 何一民;近代知識(shí)分子與辛亥思想啟蒙[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);1992年10期
10 林家有;論孫中山改造國(guó)民性的思想[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期
本文編號(hào):2299733
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2299733.html