民國(guó)初年革命派與立憲派、北洋集團(tuán)制衡下的合作
[Abstract]:The political situation in the early years of the Republic of China was closely related to the separation of forces. Each cooperation will push the society forward and the forces of all sides will win altogether; every split will lead to social retrogression, and those who gain power will also become decadent because of the loss of constraints. In the early years of the Republic of China, several forces on the political stage, whether revolutionaries or Beiyang clique, constitutionalists, were not perfect and wise, but only relatively progressive. They have a certain degree of understanding of constitutionalism and democracy, but because of the influence of a common autocratic tradition, they have different degrees of disconnect between cognition and practice, between words and deeds, and at the loss of checks and balances. Autocratic traditions all have different degrees of return. The progressive situation before and after the Revolution of 1911 benefited from the cooperation and compromise under the checks and balances of various forces at that time. Although many of the cooperation were temporary and used each other, their objective positive effects could not be ignored. Moreover, the connotation of cooperation is not limited to the complete agreement of views and actions. The revolution and constitutionalism both have the same constitutional ideals, have both made great contributions to the progress of the country, and have cooperated to varying degrees in many major events. The dependence of constitutionalism should be reunderstood. They had cooperated with the Revolutionary Party and the Beiyang Group, but had never attached themselves to them. Constitutionalism adheres to constitutional ideals and is a real political innovation. It is necessary to find the subjective reasons for the short ending of Nanjing Provisional Government. As the Nanjing interim government did not absorb all kinds of anti-Qing forces, the constitutionalists and some of the former revolutionaries were alienated from the Nanjing interim government. The revolutionaries pursued the ideal of democratic republic, but like the constitutionalists and the Beiyang group, they could not completely get rid of the influence of traditional consciousness. The new aristocracy of the revolutionaries and Yuan's dictatorship are obvious examples.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:K258
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉勁松;第一屆國(guó)會(huì)選舉再論[J];安徽史學(xué);2003年03期
2 江沛;遲曉靜;;中國(guó)國(guó)民黨“黨國(guó)”體制述評(píng)[J];安徽史學(xué);2006年01期
3 廖大偉;高紅霞;;《民立報(bào)》對(duì)南京臨時(shí)政府組建的建言和監(jiān)督[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期
4 張永;從“十八星旗”到“五色旗”——辛亥革命時(shí)期從漢族國(guó)家到五族共和國(guó)家的建國(guó)模式轉(zhuǎn)變[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期
5 李秀原;;簡(jiǎn)析南京臨時(shí)政府的政權(quán)形態(tài)[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年11期
6 王星宇;楊羽西;;袁世凱取得臨時(shí)大總統(tǒng)職位原因分析[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期
7 歐陽(yáng)亮;梁?jiǎn)⒊c孫中山[J];成都教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年11期
8 張學(xué)繼;有賀長(zhǎng)雄、古德諾與民國(guó)初年憲政體制的演變[J];檔案與史學(xué);1997年04期
9 李書源;二次革命后的國(guó)會(huì)與黨爭(zhēng)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);1991年05期
10 姜義華;民初政黨政治與黃興民主政治思想的發(fā)展[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年04期
,本文編號(hào):2251839
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2251839.html