【摘要】：甲午戰(zhàn)爭后,汪康年投身變法改革事業(yè),先后組織或參與了眾多學(xué)會(huì)和政治團(tuán)體。作為近代聯(lián)日派的重要人物,汪康年的結(jié)社活動(dòng)還與日本保持著密切聯(lián)系。同時(shí),在厲行黨禁的專制統(tǒng)治下,出于安全考慮和組織、業(yè)務(wù)需要,將日本力量引為外部支撐也十分必要。因此,日本方面的組織和人員在汪康年的結(jié)社活動(dòng)中有著特殊的地位和影響,這正是本文將要探討的主要內(nèi)容。 甲午戰(zhàn)爭后,中國興起結(jié)社集會(huì)風(fēng)潮,汪康年等人引領(lǐng)了這一時(shí)代潮流。另一方面,明治維新后,以中國為主要經(jīng)營對(duì)象的日本“興亞”思潮和團(tuán)體一直非�；钴S,日益表現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)烈的合流趨勢(shì)和輿論欺騙性。因此,在與日本“興亞”團(tuán)體聯(lián)合的同時(shí),汪康年等人往往抱有質(zhì)疑心理。 興辦學(xué)會(huì)是汪康年結(jié)社活動(dòng)的重要組成部分。在學(xué)會(huì)的組織和業(yè)務(wù)方面,一些日本人提供了人力和技術(shù)支持。與之相反,另外一些日本人卻加重了有些學(xué)會(huì)的運(yùn)行困難,產(chǎn)生了極為消極的作用。 德國占領(lǐng)膠州后,為挽救民族危機(jī),汪康年等人組織了眾多秘密政治團(tuán)體。日方人員和團(tuán)體也參與其中,起到了一定的建設(shè)作用,但也直接或間接地加劇了這些團(tuán)體的內(nèi)部矛盾。同時(shí),日本勢(shì)力的加入還引起西方國家的猜忌,中國地方實(shí)力派也高度警惕。在內(nèi)部紛爭和外力作用下,這些政治團(tuán)體的活動(dòng)大多歸于失敗。
[Abstract]:After the Sino-Japanese War, Wang Kangnian joined the cause of reform, organized or participated in many societies and political organizations. As an important figure in modern Japan, Wang Kangnian's association also maintained close contact with Japan. At the same time, under the autocratic rule prohibited by the Party, it is also necessary to introduce Japanese forces as external support for security and organization and business needs. Therefore, Japanese organizations and personnel have a special position and influence in the association activities of Wang Kangnian, which is the main content of this paper. After the Sino-Japanese War, China began a wave of association and assembly, Wang Kangnian and others led the trend of the times. On the other hand, after the Meiji Restoration, Japan's "Xingya" trend of thought and group, which mainly operated in China, has been very active, showing a strong trend of convergence and deceptive public opinion. Therefore, in association with Japan's Hsingya group, Wang Kangnian and others often have doubts. Setting up a society is an important part of Wang Kangnian association. In terms of the organization and operation of the Institute, some Japanese provided human and technical support. Other Japanese, by contrast, have made it harder for some societies to operate and have had extremely negative effects. After the German occupation of Jiaozhou, in order to save the national crisis, Wang Kangnian and others organized many secret political groups. Japanese personnel and groups also participated in the construction, but also directly or indirectly exacerbated the internal contradictions of these groups. At the same time, the entry of Japanese forces also aroused suspicion in Western countries, China's local power is also highly vigilant. Most of the activities of these political groups have failed due to internal strife and external forces.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K25

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴海斌;;1900年李鴻章與佐佐友房會(huì)晤考論[J];安徽史學(xué);2011年06期

2 衣保中,郭欣旺;藤田豐八與清末中國西方農(nóng)學(xué)引進(jìn)[J];東北亞論壇;2004年03期

3 廖梅;汪康年和庚子中國議會(huì)[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年05期

4 王偉;論戊戌維新時(shí)期的學(xué)會(huì)組織[J];阜陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年04期

5 郝艷彤;任曉鴻;;汪康年研究綜論[J];河北大學(xué)成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

6 桑兵;;“興亞會(huì)”與戊戌庚子間的中日民間結(jié)盟[J];近代史研究;2006年03期

7 邱濤;鄭匡民;;戊戌政變前的日中結(jié)盟活動(dòng)[J];近代史研究;2010年01期

8 戴海斌;;“題外作文、度外舉事”與“借資鄂帥”背后——陳三立與梁鼎芬庚子密札補(bǔ)證[J];近代史研究;2011年02期

9 桑兵;論庚子中國議會(huì)[J];近代史研究;1997年02期

10 孫f ;;晚清聯(lián)日外交的一次實(shí)踐——以1898年上海亞細(xì)亞協(xié)會(huì)為視角[J];濟(jì)南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2119707