本文選題：城濠公地 + 管理權(quán)　； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文主要利用晚清民國(guó)時(shí)期的地方志書、報(bào)刊雜志等資料,以1905一1916年間的城濠公地處理問題為研究對(duì)象,力圖較為完整地呈現(xiàn)這一問題的來龍去脈,探究不同時(shí)期、不同背景下,因城濠公地而引起的管理權(quán)爭(zhēng)端以及填濠筑路之后城濠余地的處置等問題,同時(shí)兼及涉入其中的自治機(jī)構(gòu)、提右營(yíng)、城根租戶、城濠官產(chǎn)丈放局等不同勢(shì)力和利益主體之間的利益紛爭(zhēng)。城濠公地問題凸顯于晚清地方自治興起之時(shí)�？偣こ叹终J(rèn)為,應(yīng)將城濠公地納入地方自治的管轄范圍,并提出了全面整改城濠公地的計(jì)劃。實(shí)際擁有城濠公地管理權(quán)的提右營(yíng)并不希望改變這一狀況。城根租戶出于自身利益的考慮,亦支持提右營(yíng)繼續(xù)管理公地。爭(zhēng)議因此而起,延至清亡尚未達(dá)成一致,自治機(jī)構(gòu)并未達(dá)到接收城濠公地管理權(quán)的目的。上海光復(fù)后,主導(dǎo)自治的地方精英掌握了政權(quán),趁機(jī)接管城濠公地,相繼推行拆城、填濠、設(shè)溝、筑路的工程,并公布城濠余地丈放召變方案。為了盡量保全自身利益,城根租戶與城根保產(chǎn)公會(huì)在筑路、余地處置、房屋拆讓補(bǔ)償?shù)葐栴}上提出了自己的利益訴求,并略有所獲�！岸胃锩敝�,地方自治停辦,城濠余地丈放工作以及未完成的路工建設(shè)轉(zhuǎn)由城濠官產(chǎn)丈放局負(fù)責(zé)。城濠官產(chǎn)丈放局強(qiáng)調(diào)城濠公地系“官產(chǎn)”堅(jiān)持在余地丈放時(shí)新舊租戶一體對(duì)待,拒絕給予舊租戶以任何優(yōu)待。1916年初,在迭經(jīng)波折和困難之后,南北半城的城濠丈放工作全部完竣,城濠官產(chǎn)丈放局奉令撤銷。城濠公地處置一案終告完結(jié)。城濠公地處置一案歷時(shí)十年之久。其間,各方之間的利益紛爭(zhēng)、觀念分歧和權(quán)力沖突,給城濠公地的處置帶來了諸多復(fù)雜的變數(shù)。前期各方之間因公地的歸屬和管理問題引發(fā)激烈的論爭(zhēng),固不待言；即便是城墻拆除之后,由于主事機(jī)構(gòu)的變動(dòng)、前后政策不一,填濠筑路、余地丈放等具體事務(wù)的處理亦反反復(fù)復(fù),一波三折。種種爭(zhēng)論、反復(fù)和波折的發(fā)生,既顯現(xiàn)了利益糾葛和權(quán)力博弈的復(fù)雜性和不確定性,也折射出政治局勢(shì)的變化對(duì)地方公共事務(wù)的巨大影響。
[Abstract]:This article mainly uses the local chronicles, newspapers and magazines of the period of the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China as the research object to deal with the problems in the city of Haogong from 1905 to 1916, and tries to present the origin of the problem more completely and to explore the different periods. In different backgrounds, the disputes over management rights arising from the land in the city of Gilbert and the disposal of leeway for the city after the construction of the road, as well as the autonomous organizations involved in it, raised the right camp and the tenants of the city root. City government officials and other different forces and interests between the main interests dispute. The problem of city and common land was highlighted in the rise of local autonomy in the late Qing Dynasty. The General Engineering Bureau thinks that the city public land should be brought into the jurisdiction of local autonomy, and puts forward the plan of comprehensive rectification. The right camp, which actually owns the land administration, does not want to change this situation. City root tenants in their own interests also support the right camp to continue to manage the common land. As a result, no agreement has been reached until the end of the Qing Dynasty, and the Home Rule did not achieve the purpose of taking over the administration of the city. After the restoration of Shanghai, the leading local elites took power and took the opportunity to take over the city. They carried out the demolition of the city, the filling of the city, the setting up of ditches, and the construction of roads. In order to preserve their own interests as far as possible, the city root tenants and the city root protection property association put forward their own interest demands on the issues of road construction, leeway disposal, house demotion compensation and so on, and gained a little bit. After the "second Revolution", local autonomy was suspended, and the city's leeway and unfinished road construction were transferred to the city's government office. The City Gilbert Government property Department stressed that the city's public property was "official property" and insisted that new and old tenants should be treated as one when there was room, refusing to give any preferential treatment to old tenants at the beginning of 1916, after repeated setbacks and difficulties. The north and south half of the city Haozhang work is completed, the city government office was revoked by order. The case of the disposal of the land in the city of Gilbert was finally concluded. The disposal of the city's public land lasted for ten years. During this period, the conflicts of interests, ideas and power brought a lot of complicated variables to the disposal of the city's common land. Even after the demolition of the city walls, because of the changes in the principal organs, there were different policies and policies, so they filled out roads and built roads, even after the demolition of the city walls, because of the fierce controversy between the parties over the ownership and management of the communal land. Leeway, and so on the handling of specific matters over and over again, a series of twists and turns. All kinds of arguments, repeated and twists and turns not only reveal the complexity and uncertainty of interest disputes and power game, but also reflect the great influence of the change of political situation on local public affairs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：K25

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王育群;;榕映小橋流水清[J];科學(xué)與文化;2011年12期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曹綠蔭;清末民初上海城濠公地案研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：2089485