本文選題：汪偽政權(quán) + 三民主義��； 參考：《華中師范大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：1938年12月29日汪精衛(wèi)發(fā)表“艷電”向日投降,在圖謀建立新政權(quán)的過程中,為了確保自己的合法性,汪精衛(wèi)集團打著三民主義的旗號,為其叛國行為進行辯護。三民主義理論本身的包容性,孫中山逝后國民黨各派系為爭奪“黨統(tǒng)”對三民主義閹割的歷史,以及汪精衛(wèi)集團為了漂白漢奸身份、應(yīng)對日本的壓力與消弭華北偽政權(quán)“新民主義”的現(xiàn)實需要,構(gòu)成了汪偽政權(quán)利用三民主義的背景。汪偽在對民族主義進行重新解釋時,把孫中山的民族主義放大為“大亞洲主義”,以符合日本的需要。汪偽認為中國的抗戰(zhàn)必敗,他們對孫中山“民族的基礎(chǔ)在求生存”一語進行曲解,投降行為被粉飾成“保全”民族的“義舉”,進而通過孫中山的“民族主義就是救國主義”衍伸出“大亞洲主義就是救世界主義”,以此得出“大亞洲主義就是民族主義”,是民族主義在更大范圍上的延伸的謬論。汪偽把孫中山的大亞洲主義修改的面目全非,完全成為日本“東亞新秩序”的同義詞。在汪記“大亞洲主義”的話語下,“東亞聯(lián)盟”與助紂為虐的“大東亞戰(zhàn)爭”被解釋成是對孫中山大亞洲主義的實現(xiàn)與踐行。在偽國民黨“六大”上,汪精衛(wèi)提出要“實施憲政”,本質(zhì)上是作為對抗重慶的一種策略。在日本“新體制運動”的影響下,汪偽政權(quán)大肆宣揚“中心勢力”,提出要以“一個黨,一個主義,一個領(lǐng)袖”為中心,鼓吹一黨專制與個人集權(quán)。孫中山的民權(quán)主義被汪偽篡改為法西斯主義；汪偽把“全體主義”的政治觀念應(yīng)用于經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域,提出要建立“全體主義的計劃經(jīng)濟”,實際上是統(tǒng)制經(jīng)濟。他們鼓吹“取長補短”的“中日經(jīng)濟提攜”,為其簽訂的賣國條約粉飾。汪偽政權(quán)建立“中央儲備銀行”,發(fā)行新紙幣以套取法幣,以此來支撐自身的經(jīng)濟需要以及為日本的侵略戰(zhàn)爭“輸血”。汪偽在穩(wěn)定物價發(fā)面頒布了許多條例,物價依然高漲不已。在整頓田賦方面,或者違反條例加征,或者根本沒有施行。在“民生”旗幟下的這三項經(jīng)濟政策,其一是為了掩蓋掠奪的陰謀,后兩者則因汪偽自身的原因?qū)嵭行Ч淮�。汪偽政�?quán)的三民主義,僅僅與“孫中山”這個名字有皮相性的聯(lián)想關(guān)系,是孫中山三民主義被極端工具化的一個典型事例。重慶政府與中共對汪偽盜竊三民主義的行為均予以嚴厲的批判與揭露。由于政治立場、自身利益與抗戰(zhàn)決心的不同,重慶與中共在對真正實現(xiàn)三民主義所應(yīng)采取的行動上,體現(xiàn)了不同的政治訴求。依托于國民黨土壤的重慶政府與汪偽政權(quán)在對民權(quán)主義的解釋上有著本質(zhì)上相同的主張。
[Abstract]:Wang Jingwei surrendered to Japan on December 29, 1938. In an attempt to establish a new regime, the Wang Jingwei group defended its treason in the name of the "three people's principles" in order to ensure its legitimacy. The inclusiveness of the theory of the three people's principles, the history of the KMT factions castrating the three people's principles for the "Party Unification" after the death of Sun Zhongshan, and the Wang Jingwei group's attempt to bleach the identity of the traitors. To deal with the pressure of Japan and the realistic need to eliminate the "new populism" of the pseudo-regime in North China constitute the background of Wang's pseudo-regime using the "three people's principles". In his reinterpretation of nationalism, Mr Wang magnified Sun Zhongshan's nationalism to "Greater Asianism" to meet Japan's needs. Wang Puppet believed that China's war of resistance was bound to be defeated. They misinterpreted the term "the foundation of the nation's survival" and their capitulation was whitewashed as a "righteous act" of "preserving" the nation. Through Sun Zhongshan's "nationalism is national salvation" extension of "Greater Asianism is to save cosmopolitanism", we can draw a conclusion that "Greater Asianism is nationalism", which is an extension of nationalism in a wider range of fallacies. Wang Puppet transformed Sun Zhongshan's Greater Asianism into a synonym for Japan's "New order of East Asia". Under the words of Wang Ji's "Greater Asianism", the East Asian Union and the "Greater East Asia War", which helped the tyrants, were interpreted as the realization and practice of Sun Zhongshan's Greater Asianism. At the sixth National Congress of the pseudo-Kuomintang, Wang Jingwei proposed to implement constitutionalism, essentially as a strategy against Chongqing. Under the influence of Japan's "new system movement," Wang puppet regime trumpeted the "central force" and proposed that "one party, one doctrine, one leader" should be the center, advocating one-party autocracy and individual centralization of power. Sun Zhongshan's civil rights doctrine was changed into fascism by Wang pseudo, who applied the political concept of "collectivism" to the economic field, and proposed to establish a "collectivist planned economy", which was actually a controlling economy. They preach the "economic support of China and Japan" and whitewash their traitorous treaties. The puppet regime set up the Central Reserve Bank and issued new banknotes to collect legal coins to support its own economic needs and to "transfusion" Japan's war of aggression. Bogus Wang in the issue of price stability issued a number of regulations, prices are still high. In rectifying the land tax, either in violation of regulations, or no implementation at all. Under the banner of "people's livelihood", one of the three economic policies is to cover up the plot of plunder, while the latter two have little effect because of the reasons of Wang Puppet. Wang's pseudo-regime 's three people's principles, which are only associated with the name "Sun Zhongshan", are a typical example of the extreme instrumentalization of Sun Zhongshan's three people's principles. The Chongqing government and the Communist Party of China both severely criticized and exposed Wang Puppet's theft of the three people's principles. Because of the difference of political stand, self-interest and the determination of anti-Japanese war, Chongqing and the Communist Party of China have different political demands on the actions that should be taken to realize the three people's principles. Based on the Kuomintang soil, Chongqing government and Wang pseudo-regime have essentially the same views on the interpretation of civil rights.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K265.65

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 劉瓊;“老成謀國”與“通敵賣國”：全球化視野下的汪偽通敵（1938-1945）[D];南京大學;2012年

2 楊炎輝;日汪條約關(guān)系研究（1940-1945）[D];南京大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2063994