本文選題：蒙疆政權(quán) + 法律制度��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：目前,對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)的研究主要關(guān)注日本帝國(guó)主義在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文教等領(lǐng)域的侵略活動(dòng),而日本如何以法律手段推行殖民政策尚未引起學(xué)術(shù)界重視。本文首次將研究觸角深入到法律領(lǐng)域,以日本帝國(guó)主義用法律手段在蒙疆推行殖民統(tǒng)治政策及日本殖民統(tǒng)治對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古法制近代化的阻礙作用為中心,選取立法、行政法律制度、經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)制法律制度、刑事法律制度和司法制度五個(gè)具有代表性的方面,對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度的主要內(nèi)容進(jìn)行梳理,闡述蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度的主要特征及其成因,剖析蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度維系日本殖民統(tǒng)治的工具性質(zhì)及給蒙疆地區(qū)造成的危害,論證日本殖民統(tǒng)治對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古法制近代化的阻礙作用。全文由以下六個(gè)部分構(gòu)成： 第一章偽蒙疆政權(quán)的立法,以蒙疆政權(quán)的法律匯編《蒙古法令輯覽》為中心,主要運(yùn)用文本分析的方法,從各種法律文件入手,闡述了蒙疆政權(quán)不同階段立法的基本情況,總結(jié)了蒙疆政權(quán)的法律形式,對(duì)不同形式的法律、法令的立法程序進(jìn)行了初步的梳理,指出蒙疆政權(quán)立法具有拿來(lái)主義、殖民主義、封建主義、行政中心主義等特點(diǎn)。 第二章偽蒙疆政權(quán)的行政法律制度,在對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)行政法律制度主要內(nèi)容進(jìn)行梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,分析了其行政法制的主要特點(diǎn),提出蒙疆政權(quán)的行政法制具有殖民地化、封建性的特征,認(rèn)為蒙疆政權(quán)的行政法制與近代行政法理念相距甚遠(yuǎn)。 第三章偽蒙疆政權(quán)的經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)制法律制度,以揭露日本帝國(guó)主義掠奪蒙疆資源的罪惡活動(dòng)為中心,重點(diǎn)闡述了蒙疆政權(quán)的物資統(tǒng)制法律制度、勞動(dòng)統(tǒng)制法律制度和金融統(tǒng)制法律制度的主要內(nèi)容,并把蒙疆政權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)制法律制度放在當(dāng)時(shí)整個(gè)社會(huì)環(huán)境中,大量運(yùn)用當(dāng)時(shí)的案例、事例,對(duì)其實(shí)施的效果做全面的社會(huì)考察,用實(shí)證的方法闡釋蒙疆政權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)制法律制度的殖民性質(zhì)及其給蒙疆地區(qū)造成的危害。 第四章偽蒙疆政權(quán)的刑事法律制度,運(yùn)用刑法理論分析了蒙疆政權(quán)刑法的體系,闡述了蒙疆政權(quán)刑法的主要內(nèi)容,以蒙疆政權(quán)的特別刑法為中心,重點(diǎn)分析日本帝國(guó)主義如何運(yùn)用刑法維系其在蒙疆的殖民統(tǒng)治,并從刑罰設(shè)定缺乏約束、以重刑代替輕刑、蒙漢雙軌等方面論證蒙疆政權(quán)刑事法律制度的特點(diǎn),以進(jìn)一步揭示其刑事法律制度維護(hù)日本殖民統(tǒng)治利益的工具性。 第五章偽蒙疆政權(quán)的司法制度,從司法體系、刑事訴訟法律制度和獄政制度三個(gè)方面入手,用豐富翔實(shí)的史料基本還原了蒙疆政權(quán)司法制度的原貌,闡釋蒙疆政權(quán)司法制度的殖民特征,揭示了蒙疆政權(quán)司法制度的黑暗。 第六章偽蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度的本質(zhì)與作用,為全文的總結(jié)部分,一方面從行政法律制度、經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)制法律制度、刑事法律制度、司法制度四個(gè)角度深入闡發(fā)蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度作為日本推行殖民統(tǒng)治政策的工具的本質(zhì)；另一方面把蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度放在內(nèi)蒙古法制近代化的進(jìn)程中來(lái)進(jìn)行歷史考察,通過(guò)與國(guó)民政府抗戰(zhàn)爆發(fā)前在該地區(qū)施行的法律制度的對(duì)比,從行政法律制度、刑事法律制度和司法制度三個(gè)角度,剖析蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度的實(shí)施對(duì)該地區(qū)法制近代化的阻礙作用。 與前人有關(guān)蒙疆政權(quán)的研究成果相比,本文力求在以下三個(gè)方面有所突破： 1、研究領(lǐng)域的拓展。以往對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)的研究主要關(guān)注日本帝國(guó)主義在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、教育等領(lǐng)域的侵略,而本文把研究觸角深入到法律領(lǐng)域,拓展了對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)研究的范圍。 2、研究視角的創(chuàng)新。本文對(duì)蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度的研究不僅僅是史實(shí)性描述,還對(duì)其實(shí)施的效果做全面的社會(huì)考察,并由此得出蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度是日本帝國(guó)主義推行殖民政策的工具的結(jié)論。同時(shí),本文又把蒙疆政權(quán)法律制度放在內(nèi)蒙古法制近代化的進(jìn)程中來(lái)進(jìn)行歷史考察,由此分析日本殖民統(tǒng)治對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古法制近代化的阻礙作用。 3、大量新資料的發(fā)掘和利用。筆者在撰寫(xiě)論文過(guò)程中收集了較多的第一手資料,不少史料在前人的研究中都未曾使用過(guò)。本文寫(xiě)作中發(fā)現(xiàn)和使用的新史料對(duì)于今后蒙疆政權(quán)的深入研究將有所裨益。
[Abstract]:At present , the study of the Mongolian government mainly focuses on the aggressive activities of Japanese imperialism in the fields of politics , economy , culture and so on , and how Japan attaches great importance to the development of colonial policy by means of legal means .

In the first chapter , the legislation of the pseudo - Mongolian regime , which is based on the legal compilation of Mongolian and Mongolian decrees , mainly uses the method of text analysis , expounds the basic situation of the legislation in different stages of the Mongolian and Xinjiang regime , summarizes the legal form of the Mongolian frontier regime , and makes a preliminary analysis of the legislative procedures of different forms of laws and decrees .

The second chapter analyzes the main characteristics of the administrative legal system , and puts forward the characteristics of colonization and feudalism in the administrative legal system of the Mongolian and Xinjiang regime , and believes that the administrative legal system of the Mongolian frontier is far from the concept of modern administrative law .

The third chapter focuses on the legal system of material control system , the legal system of labor unified system and the legal system of financial control .

On the basis of the special criminal law of the Mongolian Xinjiang regime , the article analyses the characteristics of the criminal legal system of the Mongolian frontier regime in order to further reveal the tool nature of the criminal legal system in the maintenance of the interests of Japanese colonial rule .

The fifth chapter starts from three aspects of the judicial system , the law system of criminal procedure law and the prison administration system , and uses abundant and informative historical materials to restore the original appearance of the judicial system of the regime of the Mongolian frontier , and explains the colonial characteristics of the judicial system of the Mongolian and Xinjiang regime , and reveals the darkness of the judicial system of the Mongolian Xinjiang regime .

Chapter 6 : The essence and function of the legal system of the pseudo - Mongolian regime , which is the summary part of the whole text , on the one hand , from the four aspects of the administrative legal system , the economic unification legal system , the criminal legal system and the judicial system , the essence of the legal system of the Mongolian regime as a tool for the implementation of the colonial rule policy in Japan ;
On the other hand , the legal system of Mongolian regime is placed in the process of the modernization of the legal system in Inner Mongolia , and the legal system of Mongolian Xinjiang is analyzed from three angles of administrative legal system , criminal legal system and judicial system through comparison with the legal system in the region before the outbreak of the anti - war of the National Government .

Compared with the previous research results , this paper tries to make a breakthrough in the following three aspects :

1 . The research field expands . Previous researches on the Mongolian Xinjiang have focused on the aggression of Japanese imperialism in the fields of politics , economy , culture and education , and this paper probes into the law field and expands the scope of the study of the Mongolian frontier regime .

2 . Research on the innovation of the angle of view . The research on the legal system of Mongolian regime is not only the historical description , but also makes a comprehensive social investigation on the effect of the implementation of the regime , and concludes that the legal system of Mongolian regime is the tool of Japanese imperialism to carry out the colonial policy . At the same time , the article also puts forward the historical investigation of the legal system of Mongolian regime in the process of the modernization of the legal system in Inner Mongolia , and analyzes the obstruction of Japanese colonial rule to the modernization of the legal system of Inner Mongolia .

3 . The author has collected more first - hand information in the process of writing , and many historical materials have not been used in the previous studies . It will be beneficial to find and use new historical materials in this paper .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929;K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 樸j;抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期蒙疆的鴉片貿(mào)易與日本對(duì)華政策[J];檔案與史學(xué);1995年02期

2 李茂杰;日本關(guān)東軍出兵西進(jìn)策動(dòng)偽蒙政權(quán)活動(dòng)述評(píng)[J];民國(guó)檔案;1998年01期

3 居之芬;關(guān)于日本在華北的勞務(wù)統(tǒng)制若干問(wèn)題研究[J];民國(guó)檔案;1999年04期

4 居之芬;論太平洋戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)后日本強(qiáng)擄虐待華北強(qiáng)制勞工罪行[J];民國(guó)檔案;2003年02期

5 黃建偉;偽蒙疆政府的稅制[J];草原稅務(wù);1995年12期

6 居之芬;二次大戰(zhàn)期間日本使用中國(guó)強(qiáng)制勞工人數(shù)初考[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2001年01期

7 祁建民;日本陸軍與“蒙疆聯(lián)合委員會(huì)”[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2002年02期

8 居之芬;關(guān)于日本在華北勞務(wù)掠奪體系與強(qiáng)制勞工人數(shù)若干問(wèn)題考[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2002年03期

9 徐志民;;近代日本政府對(duì)偽蒙疆政權(quán)留日學(xué)生政策探微[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2008年02期

10 居之芬;對(duì)日本強(qiáng)擄輸出華北強(qiáng)制勞工人數(shù)考證問(wèn)題的一點(diǎn)看法[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;1999年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2031620