本文選題：《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》 + 汪康年��； 參考：《寧夏大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)在鴉片戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)以后,面臨著前所未有的挑戰(zhàn),近代化之旅已然開(kāi)始。在社會(huì)變革的浪潮中,知識(shí)分子表現(xiàn)出相當(dāng)?shù)臒崆?不同的政治派別為了中國(guó)的自強(qiáng)求富而不斷努力�！稌r(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》作為激烈動(dòng)蕩時(shí)代的產(chǎn)物,就其本身和其所承載的內(nèi)容而言,是知識(shí)分子探索救亡圖存、發(fā)表變革主張的重要輿論陣地,在這一時(shí)期發(fā)揮了重要的作用。作為主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)辦者,汪、梁二人在其存續(xù)期間利用這一輿論陣地闡述了大量政治見(jiàn)解與變法主張。汪、梁二人集中代表和反映了這一時(shí)期中國(guó)知識(shí)分子面對(duì)社會(huì)巨變所做出的反應(yīng)。將汪、梁進(jìn)行對(duì)比是因?yàn)橥艨的旰土簡(jiǎn)⒊`屬于不同的政治派別,但是他們利用《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》為社會(huì)改良做出了貢獻(xiàn),二人具有代表性,是了解這一時(shí)代特征的一個(gè)窗口。本文從不同方面對(duì)汪、梁二人在《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》上發(fā)表的變法主張進(jìn)行研究,旨在深入理解這一時(shí)期不同知識(shí)分子對(duì)社會(huì)變革的態(tài)度和設(shè)想。本文將從五章內(nèi)容對(duì)汪、梁變法主張進(jìn)行分析探討。第一章通過(guò)對(duì)《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》進(jìn)行探析,主要了解汪、梁二人與該報(bào)的關(guān)系,以及他們于該報(bào)創(chuàng)辦過(guò)程中所發(fā)揮的作用。第二章通過(guò)汪、梁二人在《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》上對(duì)變法必要性認(rèn)識(shí)的探究,進(jìn)行比較,分析此種認(rèn)識(shí)的社會(huì)根源與個(gè)體的知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)之間的聯(lián)系。第三章通過(guò)分析二人對(duì)于開(kāi)議會(huì)、辦學(xué)校的主張,進(jìn)一步了解不同知識(shí)分子背后的社會(huì)力量之間的較量。第四章是分析汪、梁二人對(duì)工商求富和軍事自強(qiáng)的變法主張,來(lái)深入探究近代中國(guó)知識(shí)分子對(duì)工商求富和軍事自強(qiáng)的主張和設(shè)想。第五章通過(guò)對(duì)汪、梁變法主張的評(píng)析,著重就《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》的�？蜻M(jìn)行宏觀分析,同時(shí)對(duì)汪、梁二人的變法主張進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。通過(guò)對(duì)汪、梁在《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》上變法主張的比較研究,本文認(rèn)為汪、梁二人的變法主張,對(duì)中國(guó)近代社會(huì)變革具有重要的宣傳意義和啟蒙意義,他們代表不同的政治派別,其變法主張除了反映個(gè)人對(duì)社會(huì)在各方面的設(shè)想外,更多的反映了不同派別的斗爭(zhēng)和利益訴求以及其對(duì)社會(huì)變革的設(shè)想。但是作為知識(shí)分子,汪、梁二人并沒(méi)有試圖去彌合因不同派別斗爭(zhēng)而產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)裂痕,而是加速了這種社會(huì)裂痕的擴(kuò)張。
[Abstract]:After the Opium War, China is facing unprecedented challenges, and modernization has begun. In the wave of social change, intellectuals have shown considerable enthusiasm, and different political factions are constantly striving for China's self-imposed wealth. As a product of an era of intense turbulence, the Times Daily, as a product of the turbulent times, is itself and the content it carries. It is an important position of public opinion for intellectuals to explore and save the nation and proclaim reform, which played an important role in this period. As the main founder, Wang and Liang expounded a great deal of political opinions and reform ideas during their existence. Wang and Liang mainly represented and reflected the reaction of Chinese intellectuals to the great changes in society during this period. Wang and Liang were compared because Wang Kangnian and Liang Qichao belonged to different political factions, but they made contributions to social improvement by using the "Shi Wei Bao". They are representative and a window to understand the characteristics of this era. This paper studies Wang and Liang's opinions on reform from different aspects, in order to understand deeply the attitudes and ideas of different intellectuals to social change in this period. This article will analyze and discuss Wang and Liang's reform method from five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the relationship between Wang and Liang and their role in the founding of the newspaper. The second chapter compares Wang and Liang's understanding of the necessity of reform and analyzes the relationship between the social origin of this understanding and the individual's knowledge structure. In the third chapter, through the analysis of the two people's ideas of running a parliament and running a school, we can further understand the contest between the social forces behind different intellectuals. The fourth chapter is the analysis of Wang and Liang's views on the reform of industrial and commercial pursuit of wealth and military self-improvement, to explore the modern Chinese intellectuals' views and ideas on industrial and commercial pursuit of wealth and military self-improvement. The fifth chapter analyzes Wang and Liang's stand of reform, and analyzes the reason of stopping publication. At the same time, it evaluates Wang's and Liang's idea of reform. Through a comparative study of Wang and Liang's views on reform in the "time Affairs", this paper holds that Wang and Liang's views on reform are of great propaganda and enlightenment significance to the social change in modern China, and that they represent different political factions. In addition to reflecting the individual's assumption of the society in all aspects, the reform proposal reflects the struggle and interest demands of different factions and their vision of social change. But as intellectuals, Wang and Liang did not try to bridge the social rift caused by the struggle between different factions, but accelerated the expansion of the social rift.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧夏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K252

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王惠榮;;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》內(nèi)訌背后的學(xué)派與地域之爭(zhēng)[J];南通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

2 朱至剛;;人脈與資金的聚合——從汪康年、黃遵憲合作看《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》的創(chuàng)立[J];近代史研究;2011年05期

3 李里峰;;中國(guó)近代史上的保守與激進(jìn)——以汪康年為例的思想史闡釋[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

4 謝丹;;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》的民權(quán)宣傳研究[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年07期

5 黃旦;詹佳如;;同人、幫派與中國(guó)同人報(bào)——《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》紛爭(zhēng)的報(bào)刊史意義[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2009年04期

6 郭常英;張秀麗;;傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)心理對(duì)汪康年政治態(tài)度的影響[J];中州學(xué)刊;2008年04期

7 朱至剛;;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》內(nèi)訌的傳播分析——以汪康年和梁?jiǎn)⒊南嗷ハ胂鬄橹行腫J];國(guó)際新聞界;2006年10期

8 馬勇;;近代中國(guó)知識(shí)分子的悲劇——試論《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》內(nèi)訌[J];安徽史學(xué);2006年01期

9 吳果中;;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》與中國(guó)近代公共輿論空間的建構(gòu)[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

10 潘光哲;;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》和它的讀者[J];歷史研究;2005年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 許瑩;辦報(bào)干政的另一種探索[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 章光偉;戊戌時(shí)期汪康年政治思想研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2013年

2 郝艷彤;試論汪康年與《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》[D];河北大學(xué);2007年

3 張麗婕;清末知識(shí)分子辦報(bào)的困境[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

4 方慧琪;《時(shí)務(wù)報(bào)》的輿論變化與近代政治權(quán)勢(shì)紛爭(zhēng)[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

5 普進(jìn);梁?jiǎn)⒊航鷪?bào)刊與民主啟蒙[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1907803