發(fā)布時間：2018-05-17 05:22

  本文選題：行業(yè)登記 + 業(yè)權(quán)�。� 參考：《中國社會經(jīng)濟史研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：從業(yè)權(quán)制度的視角來看,天津腳行內(nèi)部缺乏有效的業(yè)權(quán)界定,使其在清末民初的業(yè)權(quán)交易中產(chǎn)生大量糾紛。對于天津腳行而言,始于1936年的腳行登記不僅僅是一種行業(yè)管理制度,也是一種業(yè)權(quán)界定制度。通過行業(yè)登記,腳行的業(yè)權(quán)實現(xiàn)了從行業(yè)慣例向政府制度的轉(zhuǎn)化,獲得官方界定與保障。但與此同時,腳行規(guī)避了法規(guī)的業(yè)權(quán)限制,保留了業(yè)權(quán)自行流轉(zhuǎn)的行業(yè)慣例。在行業(yè)登記過程中,腳行業(yè)權(quán)人圍繞業(yè)權(quán)界定發(fā)生了激烈糾紛,在利益驅(qū)動下不斷建構(gòu)與解構(gòu)腳行的業(yè)權(quán)譜系,以爭取政府的認(rèn)可。經(jīng)過激烈的爭奪,天津最終形成全市腳行業(yè)權(quán)格局。
[Abstract]:From the angle of view of the system of employment right, the lack of effective definition of ownership in Tianjin foot line makes it produce a large number of disputes in the transaction of title in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China. For Tianjin foot Bank, the foot registration, which began in 1936, is not only an industry management system, but also a title definition system. Through trade registration, the right of ownership of foot line realizes the transformation from trade practice to government system, and gets official definition and protection. But at the same time, foot-line circumvented the legal title limit and retained the trade practice of the right to self-circulation. In the process of trade registration, there is a fierce dispute about the definition of ownership in the foot trade, and the ownership pedigree is constantly constructed and deconstructed under the interest drive, in order to gain the recognition of the government. After fierce competition, Tianjin finally formed the right pattern of the city's foot industry.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【基金】：天津市哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃項目(TJZL12-022) 天津師范大學(xué)博士基金項目(52WW1210)資助
【分類號】：F729;K262.9
，

本文編號：1900095