發(fā)布時間：2018-05-13 23:25

  本文選題：戴季陶 + 《星期評論》��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 1919年6月,在五四運(yùn)動的影響下,以孫中山為代表的資產(chǎn)階級革命黨人反思辛亥革命失敗的教訓(xùn),認(rèn)識到人的現(xiàn)代化是政治變革、社會變革的前提。他們積極投身當(dāng)時洶涌澎湃的新文化運(yùn)動,先后創(chuàng)辦了《星期評論》、《民國日報》副刊“覺悟”、《建設(shè)》三大刊物,對新文化運(yùn)動起了推波助瀾的作用。 《星期評論》的創(chuàng)辦人戴季陶、沈玄廬和孫棣三,主要撰稿人有戴季陶、沈玄廬、李漢俊。陳獨(dú)秀、胡適、李大釗、羅家倫、蔣夢麟等名噪一時的新文化運(yùn)動的代表人物為刊物供過稿,朱執(zhí)信、胡漢民、廖仲愷等國民黨的重要理論人物也有一些言說在上面發(fā)表�！缎瞧谠u論》的發(fā)行量在高峰時超過了3萬份,當(dāng)時它與《每周評論》齊名,一起被譽(yù)為“輿論界中最亮的兩顆明星”。深入探討《星期評論》與五四時期社會改造思潮的關(guān)系對研究中共黨史和中國現(xiàn)代史有著十分重大的意義。 《星期評論》的第一大特色是研究勞工運(yùn)動。從創(chuàng)刊到�？�,幾乎每期都有關(guān)于勞工問題的重要文章。這些文章主要包括三大類：(1)介紹世界勞工運(yùn)動；(2)調(diào)查中國勞工狀況,(3)探討解決中國的勞工問題的途徑。 女子解放是五四時期的熱門話題,《星期評論》曾開辟專題《女子解放從那里做起》,引來了多方的積極參與�！缎瞧谠u論》關(guān)于女子解放問題的探討主要包括女子解放的主體是誰；女子解放與男子解放的關(guān)系；“女子解放”還是“女子神圣”；女子解放與教育平等、經(jīng)濟(jì)獨(dú)立、改造家庭組織的關(guān)系等幾個方面。 《星期評論》是當(dāng)時宣傳馬克思主義的重要陣地。該刊向讀者介紹了馬克思、恩格斯、李卜克內(nèi)西等國際共產(chǎn)主義史上的重要人物,闡述了馬克思主義基本理論的主要內(nèi)容,并提出馬克思主義要與各國國情相結(jié)合這一命題。該刊對十月革命以后俄國的發(fā)展情況給予了高度的關(guān)注。 《星期評論》是國民黨人創(chuàng)辦的理論刊物,對孫中山及其三民主義的推崇自然是題中之義。在宣傳三民主義方面,該刊的側(cè)重點(diǎn)是介紹全民政治和直接民權(quán)思想,探討如何發(fā)展中國的實(shí)業(yè),實(shí)現(xiàn)民生主義。 《星期評論》對五四時期喧囂一時的互助論、新村主義等思想也給予了不少關(guān)注,對當(dāng)時在北京等地興辦的工讀互助團(tuán)給予了輿論上的支持。在國內(nèi)工讀互助團(tuán)的實(shí)踐失敗后,又曾刊文探討失敗的原因。 總之,《星期評論》積極宣傳新文化、新思想,探討中國的前途和未來,探索救國救民之路,是五四時期從屬于新文化陣營的一份進(jìn)步刊物。該刊的中的一些文章用今天的眼光看可能帶有這樣或那樣的缺點(diǎn),但那大多數(shù)是時代造成的,不足為怪,更不影響其在當(dāng)時的進(jìn)步性。
[Abstract]:In June 1919, under the influence of the May 4th Movement, the bourgeois revolutionaries, represented by Sun Zhongshan, reflected on the lessons of the failure of the 1911 Revolution and realized that the modernization of human beings was the premise of political and social change. They actively devoted themselves to the surging new cultural movement at that time, and successively set up the "week Review", the "Republic of China Daily" supplement, "consciousness" and "Construction", which contributed to the new cultural movement. Dai Jitao, Shen Xuanlu and Sun Disan, chief contributors are Dai Jitao, Shen Xuanlu, Li Hanjun. Chen Duxiu, Hu Shi, Li Dazhao, Luo Jialun, Jiang Menglin and other famous representatives of the New Culture Movement contributed articles to the publication, Zhu Zhixin, Hu Han-min, Some of the important KMT theorists, such as Liao Zhongkai, have also published some words on it. The circulation of the Weekly Review reached a peak of more than 30, 000. At that time, it was in line with the Weekly Review. Together known as the "two brightest stars in the world of public opinion." It is of great significance to study the history of the Communist Party of China and the modern history of China to probe into the relationship between the Weekly Review and the ideological trend of social reform during the May 4th Movement. The first feature of the Weekly Review is the study of the labor movement. From its inception to its suspension, almost every issue has important articles on labour issues. These articles mainly include three categories: 1) introduction to the World Labor Movement / 2) investigation of China's Labor situation. (3) ways to solve China's Labor problems. Women's emancipation was a hot topic in the May 4th period. Week Review once opened a special topic, "Women's Liberation from where", which attracted the active participation of many parties. The discussion about women's emancipation mainly includes who is the main body of women's liberation; The relationship between the emancipation of women and the liberation of men; whether the emancipation of women is sacred to women; the equality of women's liberation with education, the economic independence, the relations of reforming family organizations and so on. The Weekly Review was an important front for propagating Marxism at that time. The journal introduces the important figures in the history of international communism, such as Marx, Engels, Libknessy and so on, expounds the main contents of the basic theory of Marxism, and puts forward the proposition that Marxism should be combined with the national conditions of various countries. The magazine paid great attention to the development of Russia after the October Revolution. The weekly review is a theoretical publication founded by the Kuomintang, and it is natural to praise Sun Zhongshan and the three people's principles. In the aspect of propagandizing the three people's principles, the emphasis of the magazine is to introduce the people's politics and the idea of direct civil rights, and to discuss how to develop China's industry and realize the people's livelihood doctrine. The "week Review" also paid much attention to the theory of mutual aid and the new villanism of the May 4th period, and gave public opinion support to the working and reading mutual-aid groups set up in Beijing and other places at that time. After the failure of the practice of the work-study mutual aid group in China, it has published articles to discuss the causes of the failure. In a word, week Review actively propagates new culture and new ideas, probes into the future and future of China, and explores the way to save the nation and save the people. It is a progressive publication belonging to the new culture camp during the May 4th Movement. Some of the articles in the journal may have some shortcomings in the eyes of today, but most of them are caused by the times, not surprisingly, not to mention their progress at that time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K261

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜濤;;開放“本體”與研究視野的重構(gòu)——以“《星期評論》之群”為討論個案[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

2 寧樹藩 ,丁Q瘟，

本文編號：1885297