本文選題：南京國民政府 + 金水農(nóng)場��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：南京國民政府時期,為支援戰(zhàn)爭和復(fù)興農(nóng)業(yè),湖北省采取了包括頒布土地處理新條例、建立農(nóng)村合作社以及成立集團農(nóng)場等措施。適逢此時,因武昌金水建閘涸出的大片湖荒皆是肥沃之壤,棄之可惜,軍事委員會委員長行營于是決定在此建立國營農(nóng)場,國營金水流域農(nóng)場即在此種情況下成立。然而因抗日戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā)以及地權(quán)糾紛的存在使得該場的發(fā)展歷經(jīng)波折。 本文在分析金水農(nóng)場建成概況的基礎(chǔ)上,將分抗戰(zhàn)前及抗戰(zhàn)后兩個階段對該場地權(quán)糾紛問題進行系統(tǒng)論述。 抗戰(zhàn)前,金水農(nóng)場承載著國民政府建設(shè)“模范農(nóng)村”的美好初衷,在規(guī)模、經(jīng)營模式等方面與同時期的農(nóng)場相比有過之而無不及。但卻因為沒有處理好對失地民眾的補償問題致使官民關(guān)系惡化并最終導(dǎo)致火燒金水農(nóng)場慘案的發(fā)生,雖然國民政府積極采取一系列補救措施以降低損失,由于沒有對癥下藥,再加上抗戰(zhàn)的爆發(fā),這場地權(quán)糾紛事件被草草結(jié)案。 抗戰(zhàn)勝利后,金水農(nóng)場為挽救因戰(zhàn)爭被踐踏的慘狀實施了大規(guī)模的整改計劃,但是該計劃沒有就土地產(chǎn)權(quán)及被征地農(nóng)民的地價補償問題作一清晰公正的交待,致使地權(quán)糾紛事件再次上演。不同于以往的武力暴動,此次糾紛民方采取的是業(yè)主請愿方式,但卻使得縈繞場、民雙方長達(dá)十余年的地權(quán)糾葛和平解決。 皆因土地產(chǎn)權(quán)問題產(chǎn)生的兩次風(fēng)波,民方為了捍衛(wèi)自己的土地利益采取了由武力到請愿的斗爭方式的轉(zhuǎn)變,政府或場方也由一貫的強硬態(tài)度轉(zhuǎn)化為接受民方和平談判的提議。民方的反應(yīng)以及政府處理土地糾紛時的做法對事件發(fā)展態(tài)勢的影響等方面再次呈現(xiàn)出了地權(quán)糾紛案中政府、場方、農(nóng)民三者之間的一般關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:In order to support the war and revive agriculture, Hubei Province adopted measures such as issuing new regulations on land disposal, setting up rural cooperatives and setting up group farms during the period of Nanjing National Government. At this time, because of the Wuchang Jinshui gate dry up large areas of lake wasteland are fertile soil, abandoned, the military Commission chairman of the camp so decided to set up a state-owned farm here, the state-run Jinshui Valley farm was established in this case. However, due to the outbreak of the War of Resistance against Japan and the existence of land rights disputes, the development of the field experienced twists and turns. On the basis of analyzing the general situation of the establishment of Jinshui Farm, this paper systematically discusses the dispute of the site right in two stages: before and after the Anti-Japanese War. Before the War of Resistance against Japan, Jinshui Farm carried the good original intention of the National Government to build "model countryside", which was better than that of the farm of the same period in scale, management mode and so on. However, due to the failure to properly deal with the problem of compensation to the people who lost their land, the relationship between the officials and the people deteriorated and eventually led to the tragic case of burning gold and water farms. Although the National Government actively adopted a series of remedial measures to reduce the losses, because there was no remedy for the case, Coupled with the outbreak of the War of Resistance, this land dispute was casually closed. After the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, Jinshui Farm implemented a large-scale rectification and reform plan to save the tragic situation that had been trampled by the war, but the plan did not provide a clear and fair explanation on the issue of land property rights and land price compensation for the peasants who had been expropriated. Causes the land right dispute event to be staged again. Unlike the previous armed riots, the civil side of the dispute adopted the method of owners petition, but it made haunting the field, the two sides for more than a decade of disputes over the peaceful settlement of land rights. Because of the two disturbances arising from the land property rights issue, the people's side has adopted a change from force to petition in order to defend its own land interests, and the government or the field side has also changed from a consistent tough attitude to accepting the proposal of the people's peace talks. The reaction of the people and the influence of the government on the development of land disputes show the general relationship among the government, the farm and the farmers in the case of land rights disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K262.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王松洋;孔德友;張孝富;;白湖農(nóng)場農(nóng)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的思考[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(上半月刊);2010年05期

2 黃華平;;民國成渝鐵路土地征收問題考察[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

3 饒?zhí)m蘭;邱雪梅;;論農(nóng)村土地征收中公權(quán)和私權(quán)的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];黨史文苑;2007年02期

4 金德群;抗戰(zhàn)時期國民黨的土地政策[J];民國檔案;1988年04期

5 彭友德;;金水農(nóng)場十年來的成就[J];中國農(nóng)墾;1959年18期

6 頓新波;湖北省金水農(nóng)場建立現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度的構(gòu)想[J];中國農(nóng)墾經(jīng)濟;1997年02期

7 孔喜梅;;農(nóng)村土地糾紛深層原因探究:法律、習(xí)俗與現(xiàn)實[J];黑龍江史志;2009年04期

8 王俊斌;;抗日戰(zhàn)爭時期的合作農(nóng)場[J];黑龍江史志;2010年03期

9 李承志;試論失地農(nóng)民社會保障制度的建立[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年01期

10 王奇生;工人、資本家與國民黨——20世紀(jì)30年代一例勞資糾紛的個案分析[J];歷史研究;2001年05期

，

本文編號：1871004