本文選題：蘇聯(lián)出兵 + 東北問(wèn)題��； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：1945年8月9日，蘇聯(lián)紅軍出兵東北，9月2日，日本在投降書(shū)上簽字。自1946年5月3日，蘇軍全部撤出兵東北，蘇聯(lián)紅軍在東北駐扎時(shí)間不足十個(gè)月。蘇聯(lián)與國(guó)民黨政府就東北問(wèn)題的交涉，對(duì)戰(zhàn)后中國(guó)革命形勢(shì)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了重大的影響。戰(zhàn)后中蘇關(guān)于東北問(wèn)題的交涉，不僅是中國(guó)東北地方史、中國(guó)近現(xiàn)代史研究的內(nèi)容，也是中蘇關(guān)系史以及遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際關(guān)系史研究的重要內(nèi)容。 本文根據(jù)蘇聯(lián)解體后公布的檔案資料，，對(duì)戰(zhàn)后中蘇關(guān)于東北問(wèn)題的交涉進(jìn)行了實(shí)事求是地分析和評(píng)價(jià)。蘇聯(lián)出兵東北參加對(duì)日作戰(zhàn)，加速了日本帝國(guó)主義滅亡的進(jìn)程，對(duì)中國(guó)抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的勝利以及戰(zhàn)后中國(guó)革命的發(fā)展有積極的作用和影響。但是當(dāng)日本戰(zhàn)敗投降后，蘇聯(lián)紅軍并未立即撤出東北，而是先后兩次向國(guó)民黨政府提出延期撤兵要求。最終由于張莘夫事件所引起的全國(guó)反蘇運(yùn)動(dòng)，蘇聯(lián)才不得不迅速?gòu)臇|北撤軍。在蘇聯(lián)紅軍駐扎東北的238天中，蘇聯(lián)紅軍把日本在東北建立的工礦業(yè)和資產(chǎn)視為“戰(zhàn)利品”進(jìn)行拆遷運(yùn)回國(guó)內(nèi)；把拆不走的機(jī)器設(shè)備，作為中蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)合作的一部分，以期掌控整個(gè)東北的經(jīng)濟(jì)。蘇聯(lián)占領(lǐng)東北期間不斷攫取東北的資源，嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了中國(guó)的主權(quán)，犯了嚴(yán)重的沙文主義和民族利己主義的錯(cuò)誤。而國(guó)民黨政府在與蘇方就“戰(zhàn)利品”和東北經(jīng)濟(jì)合作談判問(wèn)題進(jìn)行的交涉中也一直沒(méi)有妥協(xié)，據(jù)理力爭(zhēng)以期維護(hù)國(guó)家的主權(quán)。
[Abstract]:On August 9, 1945, the Red Army sent troops to the Northeast, and on September 2, Japan signed the surrender. Since May 3, 1946, all Soviet troops have withdrawn from the Northeast, and the Red Army has been stationed in the Northeast for less than ten months. The negotiations between the Soviet Union and the Kuomintang government on the northeast issue had a great impact on the development of the postwar Chinese revolutionary situation. The postwar negotiations between China and the Soviet Union on the issue of Northeast China are not only the contents of the study of the local history of Northeast China and the modern history of China, but also the important content of the history of Sino-Soviet relations and the history of international relations in the far East. Based on the archival data released after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, this paper makes a realistic analysis and evaluation of the negotiations between China and the Soviet Union on the northeast issue after the war. The Soviet Union sent troops to fight against Japan, accelerated the process of Japanese imperialism's demise, and played a positive role and influence on the victory of China's War of Resistance against Japan and the development of the postwar Chinese revolution. However, after Japan's defeat and surrender, the Soviet Red Army did not immediately withdraw from the Northeast, but twice put forward to the Kuomintang government to postpone the withdrawal of troops. In the end, the Soviet Union had to withdraw its troops from the Northeast quickly because of the national anti-Soviet movement caused by Zhang Xinfu's incident. During the 238 days in which the Soviet Red Army was stationed in the northeast, the Red Army regarded the industrial and mining industries and assets established by Japan in the Northeast as "spoils of war" for demolition and removal; and took the unbreakable machinery and equipment as part of the economic cooperation between China and the Soviet Union. In order to control the entire northeast economy. During the occupation of Northeast China, the Soviet Union continued to seize the resources of the Northeast, which seriously damaged China's sovereignty and made a serious mistake of chauvinism and national egoism. In the negotiations with the Soviet side on "spoils" and economic cooperation in Northeast China, the KMT government has not made any compromise, arguing in the hope of safeguarding the sovereignty of the country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：K266

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 饒品良;;蘇軍駐中國(guó)東北研究述略[J];黨的文獻(xiàn);2005年06期

2 饒品良;;戰(zhàn)后中蘇東北問(wèn)題交涉與國(guó)統(tǒng)區(qū)的民眾反蘇運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];俄羅斯研究;2006年01期

3 汪朝光;;關(guān)于戰(zhàn)后對(duì)蘇外交及東北問(wèn)題的激烈爭(zhēng)執(zhí)——中國(guó)國(guó)民黨六屆二中全會(huì)再研究之二[J];民國(guó)檔案;2006年03期

4 饒品良;;中蘇在對(duì)日“戰(zhàn)利品”問(wèn)題上的交涉[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);2013年02期

5 邢和明;;美國(guó)投放原子彈、蘇聯(lián)出兵與國(guó)際社會(huì)的反映[J];百年潮;2005年08期

6 汪朝光;戰(zhàn)后中蘇東北經(jīng)濟(jì)合作交涉研究[J];近代史研究;2002年06期

7 沈志華;;無(wú)奈的選擇:中蘇同盟建立的曲折歷程(1944—1950)[J];近代史研究;2010年06期

8 薛銜天;戰(zhàn)后東北問(wèn)題與中蘇關(guān)系走向[J];近代史研究;1996年01期

9 江沛;1946年春反蘇運(yùn)動(dòng)述評(píng)[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

10 李良志,廖良初;關(guān)東軍的建立與覆滅[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;1991年02期

本文編號(hào)：1817886