抗戰(zhàn)初期正面戰(zhàn)場上三次戰(zhàn)役之比較
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-28 06:27
本文選題:抗戰(zhàn)初期 + 淞滬會戰(zhàn); 參考:《南京師范大學》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:抗日戰(zhàn)爭是中華民族反抗外來入侵者第一次取得完全性勝利的民族解放戰(zhàn)爭,是中華民族史上的一座偉大豐碑。它由國民黨領導的正面戰(zhàn)場和共產(chǎn)黨領導的敵后戰(zhàn)場共同組成,這兩個戰(zhàn)場在不同的歷史階段起到了不同的歷史作用。在全面抗戰(zhàn)初期,蔣介石政權(quán)領導的正面戰(zhàn)場作為抗日戰(zhàn)爭的主戰(zhàn)場,在整個抗日戰(zhàn)爭史中起到了不可替代的作用。 本文采取了圖表數(shù)據(jù)分析、文獻史料、比較研究及歸納分析等方法,試圖以全面抗戰(zhàn)之初三場較為典型的戰(zhàn)役,即淞滬會戰(zhàn)、南京保衛(wèi)戰(zhàn)和臺兒莊戰(zhàn)役為例,分析研究這三次戰(zhàn)役發(fā)生的歷史背景,在此基礎上深入探討這三次戰(zhàn)役在諸多方面的相同與不同之處。全文分為以下幾部分: 本文第一章主要是從全面抗戰(zhàn)初期正面戰(zhàn)場在時間和空間上的界定入手,分析正面戰(zhàn)場形成的歷史背景,簡要概述這三次戰(zhàn)役發(fā)生的具體情況,在此基礎上,歸納總結(jié)全面抗戰(zhàn)初期正面戰(zhàn)場的歷史地位及作用。 本文第二章主要是在對日軍侵華的軍事態(tài)勢進行分析的基礎上,簡要概述了這三次戰(zhàn)役發(fā)生前中日雙方的作戰(zhàn)準備、戰(zhàn)略方針及會戰(zhàn)過程,以此揭示戰(zhàn)役失敗或勝利的原因。 本文第三章主要是對這三次戰(zhàn)役后果進行比較的研究,具體分析了三次戰(zhàn)役在戰(zhàn)略地位、戰(zhàn)略意志、抗戰(zhàn)精神上的相同點,闡述了三次戰(zhàn)役在國民黨參戰(zhàn)部隊組成、國民黨裝備配置、戰(zhàn)略部署、戰(zhàn)役策略及戰(zhàn)役結(jié)局上的不同之處,以期達到研究視角由史實研究向理論研究轉(zhuǎn)變。
[Abstract]:The War of Resistance against Japan is the first complete victory of the Chinese nation against foreign invaders and is a great monument in the history of the Chinese nation. It is composed of the front battlefield led by the Kuomintang and the battlefield behind the enemy led by the Communist Party. These two battlefields played different historical roles at different historical stages. At the beginning of the War of Resistance against Japan, the front battlefield led by Jiang Jieshi played an irreplaceable role in the history of the War of Resistance against Japan. By using the methods of chart data analysis, historical documents, comparative study and induction analysis, this paper attempts to take the first three typical campaigns in the War of Resistance against Japan, namely, the Battle of Songhu, the Battle of Defense in Nanjing and the Battle of Taierzhuang, as examples. On the basis of analyzing the historical background of the three campaigns, the similarities and differences of the three campaigns in many aspects are discussed. The full text is divided into the following parts: The first chapter of this paper mainly starts with the definition of the time and space of the front battlefield in the early stage of the War of Resistance against Japan, analyzes the historical background of the formation of the front battlefield, briefly summarizes the specific situation of the three campaigns, and on this basis, Summarize the historical position and function of the front battlefield in the early stage of the War of Resistance against Japan. The second chapter is mainly based on the analysis of the military situation of the Japanese invading China, and briefly summarizes the operational preparation, strategic principles and the battle process of the two sides before the three campaigns, so as to reveal the reasons for the defeat or victory of the campaign. The third chapter of this paper mainly focuses on the comparative study of the consequences of the three campaigns. It concretely analyzes the similarities in the strategic position, strategic will, and the spirit of the anti-Japanese war in the three campaigns, and expounds the composition of the three campaigns in the Kuomintang combat forces. The differences of KMT equipment allocation, strategic deployment, campaign strategy and battle outcome are expected to change the research perspective from historical research to theoretical research.
【學位授予單位】:南京師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:K265.2
【引證文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 趙媛媛;南京保衛(wèi)戰(zhàn)犧牲將領爭議研究[D];南京師范大學;2013年
,本文編號:1814151
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1814151.html