本文關(guān)鍵詞： “聯(lián)合政府” “改組政府” 中共 國民黨 構(gòu)想　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：“聯(lián)合政府”由美國總統(tǒng)羅斯福最早于開羅會議上提出,先行傳遞給了蔣介石,但對方并無回應(yīng),后經(jīng)美國駐華外交官與其國內(nèi)高層的互動,得以再次顯現(xiàn),奈何國民黨方面推三阻四,拒不接受。偶然之機,中共與美國外交官直接“碰撞”,聞知好意,便“接手”下來。1944年9月15日,林伯渠代表中共在國民參政會上作關(guān)于國共談判的報告,第一次公開地把“聯(lián)合政府”提了出來。之后長達兩年半的時間里,國共雙方圍繞中共“聯(lián)合政府”主張展開了戰(zhàn)場軍事爭奪與和平談判較量相結(jié)合的激烈沖突和斗爭,最終因彼此根本分歧過大未能達成妥協(xié)。本文以已出版檔案、回憶錄、報紙、期刊等文獻,以及一些其他資料為基礎(chǔ),對中共“聯(lián)合政府”思想的起源、中共“聯(lián)合政府”構(gòu)想與國民黨的應(yīng)對、國共雙方圍繞中共“聯(lián)合政府”主張的沖突和斗爭及中共“聯(lián)合政府”構(gòu)想的結(jié)局進行了系統(tǒng)的研究,從思想史的視角得出了新的論斷。本文主要由以下幾個部分組成：導(dǎo)言部分主要闡述了選題的緣起,即作者選擇這一題目的原因。正文部分,首先對中共“聯(lián)合政府”思想的起源進行考察,辨析“源自美國,受其影響而出現(xiàn)”與“是中共自身思想發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物”兩種目前學(xué)術(shù)界的主要觀點,得出中共的“聯(lián)合政府”思想源自美國。第二,對中共的“聯(lián)合政府”構(gòu)想與國民黨的應(yīng)對進行考察,剖析中共“聯(lián)合政府”和國民黨“改組政府”的性質(zhì)、實現(xiàn)形式及實質(zhì),得出國共兩黨構(gòu)想理論的差異性。第三,對國共雙方圍繞中共“聯(lián)合政府”主張的沖突和斗爭進行考察,探析國共兩黨談判桌上的較量、沖突的要害與特征,得出國共雙方爭執(zhí)的核心是未來中國走向選擇的主導(dǎo)權(quán)。第四,對談判破裂后國民黨改組政府的實踐和中共“聯(lián)合政府”構(gòu)想的結(jié)局進行考察,明證過于依賴強力后盾壓服對方、完全自信己方政權(quán)構(gòu)建理念的正確性、歷史恩怨和現(xiàn)實認識形成的信任溝壑等因素縱向延伸與橫向交織是其必然結(jié)果�？傊�,從思想的角度來看,國共兩黨理念的分歧極大地影響了談判桌上的較量,而談判桌上的較量又是前方戰(zhàn)場角力的直接反映,因此,未來中國走向選擇的主導(dǎo)權(quán)不僅依賴于理念,更依靠于實力。
[Abstract]:The "coalition government", first proposed by US President Roosevelt at the Cairo conference, was first passed on to Jiang Jieshi, but the other side did not respond. Later, through the interaction between US diplomats in China and its domestic high-level, it was again revealed. On the other hand, the Kuomintang side refused to accept it. By chance, the Chinese Communists directly "collided" with US diplomats and "took over" when they heard of the good intentions. On September 15th 1944, On behalf of the Chinese Communist Party, Lin Boqu delivered a report on the negotiations between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party at the National political Conference. For the first time, Lin Boqu openly proposed the "coalition government." after that, for two and a half years, The Kuomintang and the Communist Party have launched a fierce conflict and struggle based on the proposal of the "coalition government" of the Communist Party on the battlefield, which combines the military battle on the battlefield with the contest of peaceful negotiations, and finally fails to reach a compromise because of their fundamental differences. This article is based on published archives and memoirs. On the basis of newspapers, periodicals, and some other materials, the origin of the CPC's "coalition government", the concept of the CPC's "coalition government", and the response of the Kuomintang, The KMT and the CPC have systematically studied the conflicts and struggles advocated by the CPC "coalition government" and the outcome of the CPC "coalition government" concept. This paper mainly consists of the following parts: the introduction mainly expounds the origin of the topic, that is, the reason why the author chooses the topic. First of all, the origin of the "coalition government" of the Communist Party of China is investigated, and the two main viewpoints of the current academic circles, "originated from the United States and influenced by it," and "are the product of the CPC's own ideological development," are analyzed. It is concluded that the "coalition government" of the Communist Party of China originates from the United States. Second, it investigates the concept of the "coalition government" of the Communist Party of China and the response of the Kuomintang, and analyzes the nature, form and substance of the "coalition government" of the Chinese Communist Party and the "reorganization of the government" of the Kuomintang. The differences of the conception theories between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party are drawn. Thirdly, the conflict and struggle advocated by the Kuomintang and the Communist Party around the "coalition government" of the Communist Party of China are investigated, and the contest, the key points and the characteristics of the conflict at the negotiating table between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party are analyzed. It is concluded that the core of the dispute between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party is the leading power of China's choice in the future. 4th. The practice of the Kuomintang in reorganizing the government after the breakdown of the negotiations and the outcome of the CPC's "coalition government" concept were investigated. It is the inevitable result of overreliance on powerful backing to subdue the other side, complete confidence in the correctness of the concept of political power construction, the vertical extension and horizontal interweaving of factors such as historical grievances and trust gullies formed by realistic understanding. From an ideological point of view, the differences between the ideas of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party have greatly affected the contest at the negotiating table, and the contest at the negotiating table is a direct reflection of the battle in front of the battlefield. Therefore, in the future, the dominant power in China's choice will not only depend on ideas, More rely on strength.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：K265

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 祝天智;;“聯(lián)合政府”口號的博弈論分析[J];長白學(xué)刊;2009年02期

，

本文編號：1512311