【摘要】：司馬遷與桑弘羊，同處西漢武帝時代，是這一時期杰出的經(jīng)濟思想家。作為史學家的司馬遷能夠比較客觀地觀察社會經(jīng)濟生活并真實地載入史冊；而作為商人之后的桑弘羊則能深刻領悟商業(yè)經(jīng)營之道，并且把它運用于國家經(jīng)濟管理之中，他們的經(jīng)濟思想堪稱西漢中期最具影響力和代表性的經(jīng)濟思想。可以說，西漢社會經(jīng)濟的繁榮與發(fā)展，特別是商品貨幣經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展為司馬遷、桑弘羊經(jīng)濟思想之形成提供了社會經(jīng)濟土壤，使得他們對社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的一些問題有著近似的認識和總結(jié)，但由于出身、入仕、承襲學派以及所處立場的不同又使得他們在對待西漢中期伴隨著經(jīng)濟發(fā)展而暴露出的社會矛盾表現(xiàn)出迥異認識，，集中體現(xiàn)在國民經(jīng)濟管理的主張上背道而馳，即自由發(fā)展與國家干預兩種管理模式之爭。到目前為止，分別研究兩位歷史人物經(jīng)濟觀點、財政措施的文章層出不窮，但鮮有文章把兩人同時置于西漢武帝時代的歷史轉(zhuǎn)折背景下，系統(tǒng)論述兩種經(jīng)濟思想，并比較和分析這兩種經(jīng)濟思想產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟、政治、文化條件以及對中國封建社會的深遠影響。鑒于此，我想通過本文對以上問題進行探討。比較這兩種經(jīng)濟思想的異同，能夠準確地分析西漢社會政治、經(jīng)濟以及思想領域的發(fā)展與變化；有助于深刻理解我國古代經(jīng)濟思想發(fā)展的脈絡，同時也是對這兩位思想家個案研究的深化。
[Abstract]:Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang were the outstanding economic thinkers of the Western Han Dynasty. As a historian, Si Maqian was able to observe social and economic life more objectively and truly go down in history. As a businessman, Sang Hong-yang was able to deeply understand the way of business management and apply it to the economic management of the country. Their economic thought can be rated as the most influential and representative economic thought in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. It can be said that the prosperity and development of the social economy of the Western Han Dynasty, especially the development of the commodity monetary economy, provided the social and economic soil for the formation of Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang's economic thought. So that they have similar understanding and summary of some problems of social and economic development, but because of their origin, they become official. The inheritance school and their different positions made them show different understanding of the social contradictions exposed along with the economic development in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty, and concentrated on the idea of national economic management. Namely free development and state intervention two kinds of management mode dispute. Up to now, the economic viewpoints of two historical figures have been studied separately, and the articles on fiscal measures have emerged in endlessly, but few articles have systematically discussed the two kinds of economic thoughts under the historical turning point background of the Western Han Dynasty. And compare and analyze the economic, political, cultural conditions and the profound influence on the feudal society of China. In view of this, I would like to discuss the above issues through this article. Comparing the similarities and differences between these two economic thoughts can accurately analyze the development and changes of the political, economic and ideological fields of the Western Han Dynasty, and contribute to a profound understanding of the context of the development of the ancient economic thoughts in China. At the same time, it is the deepening of the case study of these two thinkers.
【學位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：K234.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 葉小草;《杜周傳》與“司馬遷去世的時間”[J];淮陰師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年03期

2 宋光輝;;儒法經(jīng)濟思想的對立與統(tǒng)一:一個西漢的案例[J];世界經(jīng)濟情況;2008年12期

3 鹿

本文編號：2266996