隋朝君臣關(guān)系研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-31 08:58
【摘要】：君臣關(guān)系是我國(guó)古代最重要的社會(huì)關(guān)系之一,也是研究傳統(tǒng)政治的首要問(wèn)題。本文之所以選擇隋朝作為中國(guó)古代君臣關(guān)系研究的對(duì)象,一是基于隋朝在制度創(chuàng)立、思想完善以及歷史地位等方面在中國(guó)古代歷史上所呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)的重要性。二是鑒于隋朝在創(chuàng)立、速盛與速亡等方面所體現(xiàn)出來(lái)的特殊性。三是因?yàn)樵谶^(guò)去的研究中,史界對(duì)隋朝全面性的探究,力度和深度都很欠缺,目前尚未發(fā)現(xiàn)從專門視角對(duì)隋朝君臣關(guān)系進(jìn)行整體性的闡釋及其類似的著作。筆者認(rèn)為,這對(duì)于整體把握隋朝歷史的政治動(dòng)向,乃至于對(duì)整個(gè)中國(guó)古代君臣關(guān)系主要脈絡(luò)的把握,都是一個(gè)值得重視的問(wèn)題。 從政治思想的角度闡釋隋朝君臣關(guān)系的邏輯體系是本文研究的主要任務(wù)和重要內(nèi)容。本文所關(guān)注者,并非是個(gè)別的君臣關(guān)系,而是從各個(gè)影響君臣關(guān)系的政治脈絡(luò),如天命、倫理、制度、行為、觀念等層面,以思想為視角,全面、系統(tǒng)地考察隋朝君主與臣僚權(quán)力之間的結(jié)構(gòu)與運(yùn)作,并結(jié)合隋朝君主與前朝宗室、與皇室等幾個(gè)特殊的君臣關(guān)系層面,從隋朝文、煬二帝的具體用人理論等政治實(shí)踐的諸多層面和角度進(jìn)一步對(duì)隋朝君臣思想進(jìn)行印證,檢視隋朝君臣之間的互動(dòng)和博弈,捕捉隋朝君臣確立與速亡的特殊性和深層次原因。 本文首先從哲理、倫理、制度、利益四個(gè)方面系統(tǒng)分析了影響君臣關(guān)系的四大因素,并論證了各種因素對(duì)君臣關(guān)系的雙重影響。 對(duì)哲理性因素的研究,除了從天命的角度闡述天立人君、君權(quán)天賦的理論基礎(chǔ)外,還從星象、五行的變化對(duì)君臣關(guān)系的雙重影響做了系統(tǒng)的探究。 對(duì)倫理性因素的研究,著重分析了仁義、禮樂(lè)的道德規(guī)范和忠信、孝悌的行為規(guī)范對(duì)君臣關(guān)系的影響,并結(jié)合具體事例闡明了在出現(xiàn)忠孝難兩全的選擇性困境時(shí)的統(tǒng)治思想。 對(duì)制度性因素的研究,從政治稱謂、權(quán)力分配、禮制內(nèi)容、法令內(nèi)容以及君臣之喻的角度論述了制度性因素的幾個(gè)層面,并分析了在政治制度的影響下,君臣權(quán)力的相互制約關(guān)系。 對(duì)利益性因素的研究,從政治功名、政治權(quán)力、政治形勢(shì)、物質(zhì)利益以及生計(jì)問(wèn)題的角度論述了利益性因素的幾個(gè)層面,并分析了隋朝維護(hù)政治利益的方式和手段。 在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文還分析了隋朝與前朝宗室、與周邊少數(shù)民族、與皇室、與“不臣者”四種特殊的君臣關(guān)系,以辨明隋朝君主在面對(duì)不同背景、不同成分的特殊臣僚群體時(shí),所體現(xiàn)出的不同的政治思想與行為方式。接著本文從實(shí)踐的角度和層面考察了文、煬二帝的用人思想及其特點(diǎn),以做到理論與實(shí)踐相結(jié)合。 在系統(tǒng)研究隋朝君臣關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上,本文還進(jìn)一步分析了隋朝建立的偶然性和必然性,考察了隋朝速亡的原因等問(wèn)題,深化了對(duì)隋朝君臣關(guān)系確立與速亡的思考,提出隋朝的速亡并非是統(tǒng)治思想理念的問(wèn)題,只是在運(yùn)行過(guò)程中因沒(méi)有始終遵循而出現(xiàn)了偏向。
[Abstract]:The relationship between monarch and subject is one of the most important social relations in ancient China, and it is also the most important issue in the study of traditional politics. This article chooses the Sui Dynasty as the object of the study of the relationship between the monarchs and the courtiers in ancient China, first, it is based on the importance of the Sui Dynasty in the aspects of institution establishment, ideological perfection and historical status in the ancient Chinese history. Second, in view of the Sui Dynasty in the founding, rapid prosperity and rapid decline and other aspects reflected in the particularity. Third, in the past research, the history circles to Sui Dynasty comprehensive inquiry, the strength and the depth are very deficient, at present has not discovered from the specialized angle of view to the Sui Dynasty monarch and minister relations to carry on the holistic explanation and the similar works. The author thinks that this is a problem worth paying attention to grasp the political trend of Sui Dynasty history as a whole, and even to grasp the main thread of the relationship between monarch and subject in ancient China. It is the main task and important content of this paper to explain the logic system of the Sui Dynasty monarch and subject relation from the angle of political thought. The focus of this paper is not on the individual monarchic relations, but on the political context that affects the monarch and subject relations, such as destiny, ethics, system, behavior, ideas, and so on, from the perspective of thought. This paper systematically examines the structure and operation of the Sui Dynasty monarch and his subordinate power, and combines the Sui Dynasty monarch with the former monarchs, the royal family and other special levels of monarch-minister relations, from the Sui Dynasty to the text. Yang-Erdi 's specific employment theory and other aspects and angles of political practice further confirm the Sui Dynasty monarch's thoughts, examine the interaction and game between Sui monarchs, and capture the particularity and deep-seated reasons of the Sui Dynasty monarch's establishment and rapid collapse. Firstly, this paper systematically analyzes the four factors that influence the relationship between monarch and subject from four aspects of philosophy, ethics, institution and interest, and demonstrates the dual influence of various factors on the relationship between monarch and subject. The study of philosophical factors not only expounds the theoretical basis of the natural gift of Heaven, monarchy and monarchy, but also makes a systematic study on the dual influence of the changes of stars and five elements on the relationship between monarchs and courtiers. The study of ethical factors focuses on the analysis of the moral norms of benevolence, propriety and music, loyalty and faithfulness, and the influence of filial piety on the relationship between monarchs and courtiers, and expounds the ruling thought when the selective dilemma of loyalty and filial piety is difficult for both sides. From the angle of political appellation, power distribution, propriety system content, decree content and monarch's analogies, this paper discusses several aspects of institutional factors, and analyses the influence of political system. The relationship between the power of monarch and minister. From the angle of political merit, political power, political situation, material interest and livelihood, this paper discusses several aspects of interest factors, and analyzes the ways and means of maintaining political interests in the Sui Dynasty. On this basis, this paper also analyzes the Sui Dynasty and the former dynasties, and the surrounding ethnic minorities, with the royal family, and with the "non-minister" of the four special monarch relations, in order to identify the Sui Dynasty monarch in the face of different backgrounds, different components of special staff groups. The different political thoughts and ways of behavior. Then, this paper examines the thought and characteristics of Wen and Yang from the perspective of practice, in order to achieve the combination of theory and practice. Based on the systematic study of the relationship between monarchs and courtiers in the Sui Dynasty, this paper further analyzes the contingency and inevitability of the Sui Dynasty, investigates the causes of the rapid death of the Sui Dynasty, and deepens the thinking on the establishment and rapid collapse of the Sui Dynasty's monarch and subject relations. It was pointed out that the rapid collapse of the Sui Dynasty was not a question of ruling ideology, but a bias in the course of operation because it was not always followed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D691;K241
本文編號(hào)：2155078
[Abstract]:The relationship between monarch and subject is one of the most important social relations in ancient China, and it is also the most important issue in the study of traditional politics. This article chooses the Sui Dynasty as the object of the study of the relationship between the monarchs and the courtiers in ancient China, first, it is based on the importance of the Sui Dynasty in the aspects of institution establishment, ideological perfection and historical status in the ancient Chinese history. Second, in view of the Sui Dynasty in the founding, rapid prosperity and rapid decline and other aspects reflected in the particularity. Third, in the past research, the history circles to Sui Dynasty comprehensive inquiry, the strength and the depth are very deficient, at present has not discovered from the specialized angle of view to the Sui Dynasty monarch and minister relations to carry on the holistic explanation and the similar works. The author thinks that this is a problem worth paying attention to grasp the political trend of Sui Dynasty history as a whole, and even to grasp the main thread of the relationship between monarch and subject in ancient China. It is the main task and important content of this paper to explain the logic system of the Sui Dynasty monarch and subject relation from the angle of political thought. The focus of this paper is not on the individual monarchic relations, but on the political context that affects the monarch and subject relations, such as destiny, ethics, system, behavior, ideas, and so on, from the perspective of thought. This paper systematically examines the structure and operation of the Sui Dynasty monarch and his subordinate power, and combines the Sui Dynasty monarch with the former monarchs, the royal family and other special levels of monarch-minister relations, from the Sui Dynasty to the text. Yang-Erdi 's specific employment theory and other aspects and angles of political practice further confirm the Sui Dynasty monarch's thoughts, examine the interaction and game between Sui monarchs, and capture the particularity and deep-seated reasons of the Sui Dynasty monarch's establishment and rapid collapse. Firstly, this paper systematically analyzes the four factors that influence the relationship between monarch and subject from four aspects of philosophy, ethics, institution and interest, and demonstrates the dual influence of various factors on the relationship between monarch and subject. The study of philosophical factors not only expounds the theoretical basis of the natural gift of Heaven, monarchy and monarchy, but also makes a systematic study on the dual influence of the changes of stars and five elements on the relationship between monarchs and courtiers. The study of ethical factors focuses on the analysis of the moral norms of benevolence, propriety and music, loyalty and faithfulness, and the influence of filial piety on the relationship between monarchs and courtiers, and expounds the ruling thought when the selective dilemma of loyalty and filial piety is difficult for both sides. From the angle of political appellation, power distribution, propriety system content, decree content and monarch's analogies, this paper discusses several aspects of institutional factors, and analyses the influence of political system. The relationship between the power of monarch and minister. From the angle of political merit, political power, political situation, material interest and livelihood, this paper discusses several aspects of interest factors, and analyzes the ways and means of maintaining political interests in the Sui Dynasty. On this basis, this paper also analyzes the Sui Dynasty and the former dynasties, and the surrounding ethnic minorities, with the royal family, and with the "non-minister" of the four special monarch relations, in order to identify the Sui Dynasty monarch in the face of different backgrounds, different components of special staff groups. The different political thoughts and ways of behavior. Then, this paper examines the thought and characteristics of Wen and Yang from the perspective of practice, in order to achieve the combination of theory and practice. Based on the systematic study of the relationship between monarchs and courtiers in the Sui Dynasty, this paper further analyzes the contingency and inevitability of the Sui Dynasty, investigates the causes of the rapid death of the Sui Dynasty, and deepens the thinking on the establishment and rapid collapse of the Sui Dynasty's monarch and subject relations. It was pointed out that the rapid collapse of the Sui Dynasty was not a question of ruling ideology, but a bias in the course of operation because it was not always followed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D691;K241
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 韓隆福;;論隋煬帝的歷史作用[J];安徽史學(xué);1986年03期
2 孫玉芝;隋亡實(shí)肇因于文帝[J];北方論叢;1997年01期
3 施建中;隋統(tǒng)一原因再探——兼論隋文帝平陳方略[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1988年02期
4 譚平;中國(guó)古代皇位嫡長(zhǎng)子繼承制的計(jì)量分析[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年04期
5 袁 剛;君王的比較和隋煬帝的事功與暴政[J];常德師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期
6 陳開科;;韓隆福教授的史學(xué)研究[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期
7 李青嶺;;隋文帝德法兼施的行政管理思想[J];平頂山工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
8 崔明德;論隋唐時(shí)期和親的影響[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);1994年03期
9 管彥波;;簡(jiǎn)論隋文帝的治邊思想與治邊措施[J];貴州民族研究;2006年02期
10 張先昌;許瑛;;試論隋代前期的文化教育政策——兼評(píng)隋文帝“不悅?cè)逍g(shù)”說(shuō)[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年09期
，本文編號(hào)：2155078
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2155078.html
教材專著
