發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-25 09:13

【摘要】：契丹遼朝前期,包括太祖、太宗、世宗、穆宗及景宗五朝70年的歷史,但是,史料的缺陷使這一階段還存在著許多難以理解的疑難。有鑒于此,本文在充分利用傳統(tǒng)史料的同時(shí),也對(duì)唐朝以來(lái)的各種官、私修史書、文集、碑銘和當(dāng)代史學(xué)著書等,進(jìn)行了廣泛的搜集、披覽和梳理、排比,試圖解決契丹遼朝前期的一些基本史實(shí)或主要現(xiàn)象的前因后果,從而準(zhǔn)確地描述其社會(huì)歷史發(fā)展的基本面貌。 首先,揭示契丹歷史發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ),填補(bǔ)學(xué)界研究的空白。唐朝時(shí)期“羈縻制度”的影響,不僅造成幽州地區(qū)存在契丹部落的事實(shí),也引發(fā)了契丹部落組織的重新調(diào)整;唐朝在形式上阻隔了幽州契丹與本土部落的正常聯(lián)系,但幽州契丹所演繹出的“幽州銀胡祿”、“五代契丹直”及“歸化人”的歷史表現(xiàn),則表明了它們與本土部落相互依賴的信念。其次,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上不斷深入。契丹遼朝政權(quán)的創(chuàng)立,同“打碎一個(gè)舊世界,建立一個(gè)新世界”的暴力革命存在著本質(zhì)的不同,它是“因俗而治”前提下的“行朝”政治的繼承與發(fā)展。遼太祖的歷史貢獻(xiàn)就是將君主專制作為行國(guó)政治的核心。其三、找出南北史料系統(tǒng)存在的共性與差異,進(jìn)而作出正確的解釋。例如“諸弟之亂”及其引起的“鹽池宴”、首領(lǐng)的三年任期等歷史問(wèn)題。本文認(rèn)為所謂“鹽池宴”,是遼太祖用民族方式懲治罪犯的記錄,在南、北地區(qū)廣
[Abstract]:The early Qidan Liao Dynasty, including Taizu, Taizong, Shizong, Muzong and Jingzong five dynasties 70 years of history, but the defects of historical materials, there are still many difficult to understand this stage. In view of this, while making full use of the traditional historical data, this article also carries on the extensive collection, draping and combing and ranking the various official, the private revision history book, the collection, the inscription and the contemporary historiography writing book since the Tang Dynasty, etc. This paper attempts to solve the causes and consequences of some basic historical facts or main phenomena in the early Qidan Liao Dynasty so as to accurately describe the basic features of its social and historical development. First of all, it reveals the foundation of Qidan's historical development and fills in the blank of academic research. The influence of "Jimi system" during the Tang Dynasty not only caused the existence of Qidan tribe in the area of Huizhou, but also caused the readjustment of Qidan tribal organization. In the Tang Dynasty, it blocked the normal connection between Heidan and native tribes in the Tang Dynasty. However, the historical manifestations of "Hulu", "straight Qidan of five dynasties" and "naturalized people" by Hewuzhou Khitan show their belief that they depend on each other with native tribes. Secondly, on the basis of previous studies, the study continues to deepen. The founding of the regime of Qidan Liao Dynasty is different from the violent revolution of "breaking an old world and building a new world". It is the inheritance and development of the politics of "acting in court" under the premise of "governing by vulgarity". The historical contribution of Liao Taizu was to regard autocratic monarchy as the core of politics. Third, find out the commonness and difference of the historical data system of north and south, and then make a correct explanation. For example, the chaos of the Brothers and the Yanchi Banquet, the three-year tenure of the leader and other historical issues. This paper holds that the so-called "Yanchi Banquet" is a record of Liao Taizu punishing criminals in a national way, which is widely used in the southern and northern regions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：K246.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊軍;;“變家為國(guó)”:耶律阿保機(jī)對(duì)契丹部族結(jié)構(gòu)的改造[J];歷史研究;2012年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王淑蘭;歷史地理視角下的遼代城市研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

2 蔣金玲;遼代漢族士人研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

3 韓榮;有容乃大—遼宋金元時(shí)期飲食器具研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王麗娟;遼述律后史跡初探[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

2 王麗亞;論王曾[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

3 馬旭輝;唐末五代幽州劉仁恭政權(quán)及其與契丹關(guān)系研究[D];河北大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2143345