本文選題：清代 + 吳派�。� 參考：《華東師范大學》2007年博士論文

【摘要】： 明清之際，學界掀起了“理學清算”浪潮，批判宋明理學，倡揚漢代經(jīng)學。在此學風浸染之下，清初至乾嘉間，以惠周惕、惠士奇、惠棟及其弟子江聲、余蕭客等為代表的一批吳地學人，批判宋明理學的侈言義理，以漢學倡于江南，系一代學風際會之所在，是稱吳派。 本文以前賢時哲的研究論著為起點，通過仔細研讀吳派學者的學術(shù)專著，審視、評價各家的學說見解，從時空的跨度、學域的深度、交游的廣度對吳派學術(shù)作一鉸系統(tǒng)的學術(shù)史梳理，期于認識吳派學術(shù)的整體面貌，進而深入地理解明清學術(shù)所經(jīng)歷的從理學到漢學的轉(zhuǎn)型。 論文分為緒言、正文和結(jié)論三個部分。緒言部分對研究對象、寫作思路和選題意義作了一定說明，并簡要回顧了學界研究狀況。結(jié)論對正文記述進行總結(jié)概括。正文內(nèi)容大致包含吳派學人(域)的個案研究、吳派治學風格與特點以及吳派學術(shù)的輻射與回響三個層面，分七個章節(jié)展開論述。 第一章至第五章圍繞吳派學人的治學領(lǐng)域與學術(shù)專著展開，在個案分析的基礎(chǔ)上揭示吳派漢學家的學術(shù)特點。第一章首先依據(jù)《惠氏宗譜》稽考東吳惠氏的相關(guān)資料，梳理惠氏的家學傳承，并簡述了惠有聲、惠周惕論學的特質(zhì)所在。第二章以吳派奠基者惠士奇為考察對象，以原始文獻考論為基礎(chǔ)，鉤沉其“罰修鎮(zhèn)江城”一事；通過《易說》、《春秋說》內(nèi)容考述惠士奇的學說思想；惠氏學說上承清初理學清算浪潮，下啟乾嘉復興漢學之風，，尤其開啟了吳派漢學的治學風尚。第三章是論文的重點章節(jié)，集中探討惠棟的學說�；輻潪閰桥蓪W術(shù)之巨擘，其《易》學、《尚書》學研究，奠定了吳派漢學之根基，確立了吳派學術(shù)的整體走向。惠棟以《荀子微言》為代表的諸子學研究、以《后漢書補注》為代表的史學研究在相關(guān)領(lǐng)域均占有重要的一席。作為一個“考據(jù)學家”，惠棟具有明確的“通經(jīng)致用”思想，其治學理念中蘊涵著深邃的經(jīng)世關(guān)懷。第四章通過分析江聲的《尚書集注音疏》及余蕭客的《古經(jīng)解鉤沉》，剖析其中所折射出的學術(shù)觀念。江、余二人的治學旨趣均秉承惠棟，加以拓展、深入而成專門之學。在吳派的發(fā)展過程中，江、余之學顯然代表著一個重要階段。第五章以《漢學師承記》為考察中心，旨在論述吳派殿軍江藩的“純漢學”思想。 第六章主要從“六經(jīng)尊服鄭、百行法程朱”的“漢宋學論”、漢學家的“學術(shù)道德”觀以及清代“實事求是”學風等三個方面闡述吳派的學術(shù)內(nèi)涵與精神主旨，探討吳派的學術(shù)風格與特點。 第七章的主題在于說明吳派的學術(shù)輻射與回響，側(cè)重考論惠棟與戴震、錢大昕、王鳴盛等漢學家的交游論學，并辨析了惠氏學說與常州學派的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:During the Ming and Qing dynasties, scholars set off a wave of "Neo-Confucianism liquidation", criticizing Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and advocating Confucian Classics in the Han Dynasty. Under the influence of this style of study, from the beginning of the Qing Dynasty to the Qianjia period, a group of Wu Di scholars, such as Hui Chou Ti, Hui Shi Qi, Hui Dong and his disciples Jiang Sheng and Yu Xiaoke, criticized the theory of extravagance of Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and advocated it in Jiangnan with Sinology. Department of a generation of intergroup, is called Wu School. This paper starts with the research works of former sages and philosophers, by carefully studying the academic monographs of Wu School scholars, examining and evaluating the opinions of various schools of thought, from the span of time and space, and from the depth of the academic field. The breadth of friendship combs the academic history of Wu school, which is based on the understanding of the overall appearance of Wu school, and the further understanding of the transformation from Neo-Confucianism to Sinology experienced by the scholars in Ming and Qing dynasties. The paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The preface explains the object of study, writing ideas and significance of the topic, and briefly reviews the current situation of academic research. Conclusion the main body description is summarized. The text contains the case study of Wu school scholars, the style and characteristics of Wu school scholarship, and the radiation and echo of Wu school academic, which is divided into seven chapters. The first to fifth chapters focus on the academic field and monographs of Wu school scholars, and reveal the academic characteristics of Wu school sinologists on the basis of case study. The first chapter firstly combs Wyeth's family heritage according to the relevant data of Wyeth pedigree, and briefly describes the characteristics of Hui Yousheng and Hui Ti's theory. The second chapter takes Hui Shiqi, the founder of Wu School, as the object of investigation, based on the textual research theory of the original literature, and recites the matter of "punishing and repairing Zhenjiang City"; The theory of Wyeth inherits the wave of Neo-Confucianism in the early Qing Dynasty, which brings about the revival of Sinology in Qianjia, and especially opens the style of studying Sinology in Wu School. The third chapter is the key chapter of the paper, focusing on the theory of Huidong. Huidong is a great scholar of Wu school, whose study of Yi Yi and Shang Shu has laid the foundation of Wu school's Sinology and established the whole trend of Wu school's learning. Huidong, represented by Xunzi Wei Yan, holds an important place in the related fields. As a "textual scholar", Huidong has a clear thought of "making use of the Tongjing", which contains profound concern for the world. In the fourth chapter, the author analyzes Jiangsheng's notes on the collection of Shang Shu and Yu Xiaoke's explanation of the ancient classics, and analyzes the academic ideas reflected in it. Jiang, Yu's academic purport of Huidong, to expand, in-depth and into a special school. In the development of Wu School, Jiang, Yu Zhixue clearly represented an important stage. The fifth chapter focuses on Sinology as the center of investigation, aiming at discussing the Wu School Dianjun Jiangfan's "pure Sinology" thought. The sixth chapter mainly expounds the academic connotation and spiritual purport of Wu school from three aspects: "six Classics veneration Zheng, hundred lines Cheng Zhu" Han and Song studies "," academic morality "of Sinologists and" seeking truth from facts "style of study in Qing Dynasty. This paper discusses the academic style and characteristics of Wu School. The theme of the seventh chapter is to explain the academic radiation and reverberation of Wu School, focusing on Huidong and Dai Zhen, Qian Daxin, Wang Mingsheng and other Sinologists' theory of friendship, and to distinguish and analyze the relationship between Wyeth theory and Changzhou school.
【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K249

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭朝暉;;略論惠棟重構(gòu)漢學的方法[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年06期

2 王應(yīng)憲;;惠士奇“罰修鎮(zhèn)江城”考論[J];東方論壇;2006年03期

3 孫運君;;清代今文經(jīng)學興起考——以惠棟、戴震、張惠言為中心[J];船山學刊;2005年04期

4 王應(yīng)憲;楊翔宇;;惠棟“通經(jīng)致用”思想及其學術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)型意義[J];重慶社會科學;2006年12期

5 梁韋弦;;惠棟《易漢學》的卦氣學研究[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年05期

6 魯夢蕾;宮辰;;論惠周惕《詩說》在詩經(jīng)研究史上的地位[J];黃山學院學報;2006年02期

7 范志新;余蕭客的生卒年(外一篇)——文選學著作考(二)[J];晉陽學刊;2005年06期

8 高明峰;談《續(xù)修四庫全書》本《國朝漢學師承記》的版本問題與文獻價值[J];圖書館理論與實踐;2005年05期

9 王應(yīng)憲;;惠士奇:清代廣東經(jīng)學的開拓者[J];嶺南文史;2006年03期

10 王應(yīng)憲;;東吳三惠研究述評[J];蘭州學刊;2007年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 林熒澤;牛林杰;;實事求是的學術(shù)傳統(tǒng)和開化思想[A];中韓實學史研究——第五屆東亞實學國際學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];1998年

2 張素卿;;惠棟《毛詩古義》與清代《詩經(jīng)》學[A];第六屆詩經(jīng)國際學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2004年

3 王法周;;惠棟與清代學術(shù)[A];中國社會科學院近代史研究所青年學術(shù)論壇1999年卷[C];1999年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前3條

1 劉墨;乾嘉學術(shù)的知識譜系[D];南京師范大學;2003年

2 鄭朝暉;述者微言—惠棟易學研究[D];武漢大學;2005年

3 陳修亮;乾嘉易學三大家研究[D];山東大學;2005年

本文編號：2066598