本文選題：不丹 + 西藏　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2007年博士論文

【摘要】： 本研究以1616年至1959年的不丹同我國西藏地方的關(guān)系脈絡(luò)為研究對象。在參閱諸多相關(guān)的國內(nèi)外史料、吸收學(xué)術(shù)界已有的研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，對兩者在政治、經(jīng)濟以及文化和宗教領(lǐng)域的關(guān)系的動態(tài)發(fā)展進行了系統(tǒng)的梳理研究。 不丹(Bhutan)，自稱“竺域”(’Brug-yul)，地處喜馬拉雅山脈南麓，其國東部、北部和西北部分別與我國西藏自治區(qū)的亞東地區(qū)、江孜地區(qū)和山南地區(qū)接壤，與中國的邊界線長為470公里。不丹是個全民信教的國家，藏傳佛教主(竺)巴噶舉是不丹的國教。由于同我國西藏地區(qū)存在著親密的民族、文化與地緣關(guān)系，不丹的整個歷史發(fā)展進程與西藏地區(qū)息息相關(guān)，自古以來西藏地方從政治、經(jīng)濟、文化等各方面深深影響著不丹，大到國家政體、小到平民百姓的日常風(fēng)俗，無不體現(xiàn)出藏文化對整個國度的根深蒂固浸漬的痕跡。但是由于近代英國殖民政府插手喜馬拉雅事務(wù)，使不丹同我國西藏地區(qū)的關(guān)系日益疏遠(yuǎn)。印度獨立后，不丹聽從印度政府的指導(dǎo)，同我國政府的關(guān)系更為冷淡。1959年借西藏地區(qū)發(fā)生動亂之機，與我國西藏地區(qū)斷絕了一切經(jīng)濟、政治、貿(mào)易以及文化上的往來。時至今日，雖然不丹同我國已經(jīng)有了一些的民間性質(zhì)的宗教文化、貿(mào)易的交往，但是遠(yuǎn)不能和過去相提并論．甚至不丹至今還沒有同我國建立正式的外交關(guān)系! 近年來，，我國的藏學(xué)研究有了長足的發(fā)展，但是對我國藏區(qū)周邊藏文化的研究尚涉足不多．學(xué)術(shù)界對藏區(qū)周邊社會、國家及其與我國藏區(qū)的歷史關(guān)系與現(xiàn)狀還缺乏系統(tǒng)綜合的研究。 本文試圖系統(tǒng)地研究厘清兩地關(guān)系的發(fā)展歷史，這不僅可為國內(nèi)的藏學(xué)研究提供新的研究領(lǐng)域，為我國制定針對不丹的對外政策提供理論與政策依據(jù)，而且還可為我國，尤其是對我國藏區(qū)的政治穩(wěn)定、經(jīng)濟與文化發(fā)展提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:This study focuses on the relationship between Bhutan and Tibet from 1616 to 1959. On the basis of referring to many related historical materials at home and abroad and absorbing the existing research achievements in academic circles, the dynamic development of the relationship between the two in the political, economic, cultural and religious fields is systematically combed and studied. Bhutan, which calls itself "Brug-yul," is located in the southern foothills of the Himalayas. Its eastern, northern and northwestern regions are bordered by the Yadong, Jiangzi and Shannan regions of the Tibet Autonomous region of China, respectively. The border line with China is 470 kilometers. Bhutan is a religious country, Tibetan Buddhist Lord (Zhu) Baja is Bhutan's national religion. Due to the existence of close ethnic, cultural and geographical relations with the Tibet region of China, the whole historical development process of Bhutan is closely related to the Tibet region. Since ancient times, the Tibetan region has deeply influenced Bhutan from political, economic, cultural and other aspects. As far as the national system of government, as small as the daily customs of ordinary people, all reflect the traces of Tibetan culture deeply ingrained in the whole country. However, the modern British colonial government interfered with Himalayan affairs, which alienated the relationship between Bhutan and Tibet. After India became independent, Bhutan followed the guidance of the Indian government, and its relations with the Chinese government were even colder. In 1959, Bhutan severed all economic, political, trade and cultural contacts with Tibet on the occasion of the unrest in Tibet. Today, although Bhutan and China already have some folk nature of religious culture, trade exchanges, but far from the past. Even Bhutan has not yet established formal diplomatic relations with China! In recent years, the study of Tibetan studies in our country has made great progress, but the study of Tibetan culture around Tibetan areas in China is not much involved. There is a lack of systematic and comprehensive research on the historical relationship and present situation between the country and Tibetan areas in China. This paper attempts to systematically study and clarify the development history of the relationship between the two places, which can not only provide a new research field for Tibetan studies in China, but also provide a theoretical and policy basis for China to formulate a foreign policy for Bhutan. Especially for the political stability, economic and cultural development of Tibetan areas in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K249

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 柳森;六世班禪額爾德尼研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：2062286