本文選題：金朝 + 文士　； 參考：《中央民族大學》2006年博士論文

【摘要】：本文從金朝“異代”文士與皇權(quán)政治互動的視角，研究遼宋文士對金朝社會進步的貢獻及政治環(huán)境對他們的塑造�；蕶�(quán)、皇權(quán)政治在女真社會的出現(xiàn)是歷史的進步，有賴于“異代”文士的推動；金朝的皇權(quán)政治脫胎于民主議事的貴族政治，，皇權(quán)與貴族既斗爭又聯(lián)合，“異代”文士斡旋其中，推動政治又困于政治，導致他們的政治境遇撲朔迷離。全文共分四章，初步地研究遼東文士、燕云文士、兩宋文士及文士家族群帶關(guān)系與金朝皇權(quán)、皇權(quán)政治的互動關(guān)系。 第一章：通過對女真人建國歷史背景的研究，針對阿骨打“以都勃極烈嗣大位”的歷史懸疑，根據(jù)歷史資料與北方民族共同的文化心理，初步認識到，在女真民族文化視野中，都勃極烈可與中原王朝的皇帝相匹。通過都勃極烈與皇帝關(guān)系的梳理，進而提出“收國”是阿骨打稱都勃極烈時期的年號。對劉浦江先生關(guān)于金朝開國史真實性的質(zhì)疑，提出了一種闡釋；澄清了楊樸在阿骨打稱帝歷史中的貢獻，并探討了《金史》不為其立傳的政治因素。楊樸勸阿骨打稱帝在貴族政治中埋下了變革的種子，與捍衛(wèi)貴族政治的渤海另一文士高慶裔，從不同的出發(fā)點影響皇權(quán)政治的進步。 第二章：阿骨打率軍進入燕云地區(qū)，注定了金朝發(fā)展封建制度的必然。燕云文士憑籍仕遼的經(jīng)驗，把握金初政治走向，是女真人發(fā)展取向選擇的有力推動者。他們捭闔于貴族與皇權(quán)之間，以保境安民為己任，引導女真貴族轉(zhuǎn)變觀念。女真貴族的信任使之多居樞要，韓企先為相近二十年，參與關(guān)決大政，立“難言”之功；韓f 為帝王之師，力圖把金熙宗培養(yǎng)成“漢人天子”，但受制于政治環(huán)境，他只能傳授給他王觀念，而不能給予他實際權(quán)力，精神與現(xiàn)實的錯位，使熙宗的政治行為日趨頹廢，韓f 匡救無措。 第三章：兩宋文士多種渠道入仕金朝，宋與金在文化、制度上的差距，反映在文士身上，便是對金朝政治的不相容性。仕進的政治態(tài)度錯綜復雜，多數(shù)人不約而同地經(jīng)歷了抵觸、彷徨、無奈。即使仕于金朝，內(nèi)心的矛盾也
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the interaction between the scholars of the Jin Dynasty and the imperial power, this paper studies the contribution of the scholars of Liao and Song dynasties to the social progress of the Jin Dynasty and the shaping of them by the political environment. The emergence of imperial power politics in the Nuzhen society is the progress of history and depends on the promotion of the scholars of "different generations." the imperial power politics of the Jin Dynasty was born out of the aristocratic politics of democratic deliberation, and the imperial power and the aristocracy both struggle and unite. The interludes of different generations of scribes, which pushed politics and trapped in politics, caused their political situation to be complicated. The full text is divided into four chapters, and preliminarily studies the interaction between the scholars of Liaodong, Yan Yun, the scholars of Song Dynasty and the clan group of literati and the imperial power and imperial power politics of Jin Dynasty. The first chapter: through the research on the historical background of the founding of the nation of the real woman, aiming at the historical suspense of Aguda's "taking the place of the great heir of the Duboji martyr", and according to the historical data and the common cultural psychology of the northern nationalities, it is preliminarily realized that, in the view of the national culture of Nu Zhen, Dupo was strong enough to match the emperors of the Central Plains. Through combing the relationship between Dubozhili and the emperor, the author put forward that "the country of capture" was the year of Aguda's period. This paper puts forward a kind of explanation to Mr. Liu Pujiang's questioning of the authenticity of the founding history of the Jin Dynasty, clarifies Yang Pu's contribution in the history of Aguda's reign as emperor, and probes into the political factors that "Jin Shi" does not pass on for him. Yang Pu advised Aguda to become emperor in the aristocratic politics and planted the seeds of change, which influenced the progress of imperial power politics from different starting point, compared with Gao Qing people, another scholar in Bohai Sea who defended the aristocratic politics. The second chapter: Agu beat army into the Yanyun area, doomed the Jin Dynasty to develop the feudal system inevitable. Yan Yun literati, based on the experience of Liao Dynasty, grasped the political trend in the early Jin Dynasty, and was a powerful promoter of the choice of the female real person's development orientation. They manoeuvred between the aristocrat and the imperial power to protect the territory and the people as their own responsibility to guide the transformation of the concept of the aristocrat. The trust of the Nuzhen aristocrat led to a great deal of success. Han Kei was close to him for 20 years, participated in the decision of the Great Government, and made the feat of "unspeakable"; Han f was the emperors' teacher who tried to cultivate Jin Xizong as the "son of the Han people", but he was constrained by the political environment. He could only impart to him the concept of king, but could not give him actual power, the dislocation of spirit and reality, which made Xizong's political behavior decadent day by day, and Han f was unable to rescue him. Chapter three: the political incompatibility of the Jin Dynasty is reflected in the cultural and institutional gap between the Song Dynasty and the Jin Dynasty. The political attitude of official advance is complicated, most people have experienced conflict, hesitation and helplessness. Even in the Jin Dynasty, the innermost contradictions
【學位授予單位】：中央民族大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：K246.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董克昌;關(guān)于評價完顏亮的幾個問題[J];北方文物;1987年04期

2 肖民;也論完顏亮——兼與《完顏亮論》作者商榷[J];北方文物;1989年04期

3 徐松巍,史小云,聶紅云;對完顏亮研究的回顧與反思——兼及歷史人物評價問題[J];北方文物;1992年02期

4 楊果;金代翰林與政治[J];北方文物;1994年04期

5 孟東風;金代女真人的漢化與民族融合[J];東北師大學報;1994年06期

6 劉浦江;關(guān)于金朝開國史的真實性質(zhì)疑[J];歷史研究;1998年06期

7 董四禮;試論金天會十年的皇儲之爭[J];求是學刊;1989年03期

8 劉光永;;吳晗對封建皇權(quán)的剖析[J];求索;2005年12期

9 蘇金源;論完顏阿骨打的政治、經(jīng)濟改革[J];史學集刊;1982年02期

10 楊保隆;試談金代廢除勃極烈制度的最初動因[J];社會科學戰(zhàn)線;1994年01期

本文編號：1965596