本文選題：唐代 + 太常博士��； 參考：《南開學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2014年05期

【摘要】：唐代太常博士擬謚制度遠(yuǎn)承魏晉,近襲北朝,在執(zhí)行的過程中日趨完善嚴(yán)密。唐代太常博士擬謚以經(jīng)過考功司覆核勘驗(yàn)的行狀為依據(jù),并參考?xì)v代謚法確定謚號(hào)用字,以名實(shí)相副、懲惡勸善為基本原則。太常博士擬定謚號(hào)后,形成公文即謚議移交尚書省討論可行與否,參與討論的官員如有異議,亦需形成公文說明反對(duì)的理由并要求返回太常寺重議,而重議之結(jié)果則因時(shí)因人而異。唐代太常博士擬謚程序井然,過程復(fù)雜嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),體現(xiàn)了唐代行政機(jī)構(gòu)處理政務(wù)的規(guī)范性與成熟性。
[Abstract]:In the Tang Dynasty, the system of Taichang doctor's posthumous title inherited from Wei and Jin dynasties, and was more and more perfect in the process of execution. The Tang Dynasty Taichang Doctor proposed posthumous title was based on the line of examination by the Secretary for examination and examination, and referred to the posthumous method of the past dynasties to determine the number of posthumous words, to the name of the truth, to punish evil as the basic principle of persuasion. After Dr. Taichang worked out the posthumous title, the official document was formed, that is, the posthumous title was handed over to the province to discuss whether it was feasible or not. If the officials involved in the discussion had any objection, they should also form a document stating the reasons for the objection and requesting to return to Taichang Temple for reconsideration. The outcome of the renegotiation varies from time to time. The Tang Dynasty Taichang Doctor imitated the posthumous procedure well, the process is complicated and rigorous, has manifested the Tang Dynasty administrative organization to deal with the government affairs the standardization and the maturity.
【作者單位】： 陜西師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K242

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 楊英;;劉宋郊禮簡(jiǎn)考[A];魏晉南北朝史研究：回顧與探索——中國(guó)魏晉南北朝史學(xué)會(huì)第九屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉嘯;魏晉南北朝太常研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

2 亢杰;王洙學(xué)術(shù)初探[D];北京大學(xué);2011年

3 時(shí)英英;唐前移文研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

4 渠}^%;gqo"熹平石}撗芯縖D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1858802