本文選題：邊際報酬遞減 + 人均產值　； 參考：《學術界》2014年04期

【摘要】：正近年來,18世紀中國是國內外學術界研究的熱點。怎樣評價18世紀中國的實際發(fā)展水平,國內外學術界的分歧極大,甚至形成觀點截然對立的兩個陣營。在歐美學界,以"加州學派"為核心的學者對18世紀的中國評價很高,認為無論生產力發(fā)展水平還是在人均產值方面,中國直到19世紀初期仍處于世界領先水平;而另外一些學者不同意上述觀點,如黃宗智提出了著名的"內卷化"(involution,有學者譯為"內卷型"、"過密化"、"過密型"等)的概念,認為18世紀的中國已經出現(xiàn)了勞動密集化、勞動邊際報酬遞減、勞動生產率下降的現(xiàn)象。〔1〕總
[Abstract]:In recent years, the 18 th century China is the hot spot of academic research at home and abroad. How to evaluate the actual development level of China in the 18th century, the academic circles at home and abroad differ greatly, and even form two camps whose views are diametrically opposed. In the European and American academic circles, the scholars with the "California School" as the core have a high opinion of China in the 18th century, and think that China is still in the world leading level until the beginning of the 19th century, whether in the level of productivity development or in the per capita output value. Other scholars do not agree with the above views. For example, Huang Zongzhi put forward the famous concept of "involutionization". Some scholars translated it as "inner scroll type", "too dense type", etc.). He thought that labor intensive had already appeared in China in the 18th century. The decline in labor productivity.
【作者單位】： 山東大學外國語學院;
【分類號】：K249
，

本文編號：1819246