本文選題：宋代　切入點：立嗣制度　出處：《華東政法大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 自從西周建立宗法制度,并在血食觀念的影響下,奉行“大宗子”主祭的原則開始,立嗣作為一種社會習俗登上了歷史的舞臺。起初,立嗣的情況僅發(fā)生貴族家庭之中�！按笞跓o后而立小宗之子為后”,雖然立嗣基于祖先祭祀而產(chǎn)生,但是立嗣的出現(xiàn)還起到了維護了貴族大家庭等級制度的作用。到了秦漢時期,由于戰(zhàn)亂的長期影響,宗族散失,人人各自為宗,因此立嗣成為了所有百姓家庭的事情。從此立嗣觀念深入人心,作為宗祧繼承的保障手段,不僅延續(xù)了封建禮教的統(tǒng)治地位,更對中國封建制度的維持和鞏固產(chǎn)生了重要的作用。 然而唐代以前,立嗣僅僅是一種民間習俗,受到傳統(tǒng)禮教的影響,卻沒有受到法律的規(guī)范。立嗣行為是否適當,由禮教的經(jīng)義、社會的習俗來判斷,法律沒有相關的規(guī)定,自然也就沒有了判斷和處罰的依據(jù)。唐代首次出現(xiàn)了有關立嗣的法律條文,但僅對立嗣問題作了簡單的規(guī)定,而無法使立嗣制度形成一個完整的系統(tǒng)。直到宋代,在沿襲唐律的基礎上,結(jié)合當時的社會經(jīng)濟環(huán)境,制定出了一系列與立嗣相關的律令。在法律、習俗和禮教的相互影響和作用下,特別是訴訟觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變,立嗣制度逐漸系統(tǒng)化和完善化,為明清立嗣制度的繼續(xù)發(fā)展打下了堅實的基礎。有鑒于立嗣與傳統(tǒng)宗法觀念的相互作用,以及立嗣對于中國古代整個封建社會發(fā)展的重要作用,選擇宋代這個致力于加強封建專制集權(quán)和儒家思想統(tǒng)治的時期,來探討立嗣制度的形成和內(nèi)容,對研究整個古代社會立嗣制度的發(fā)展和作用都有重要的意義。 本文包括前言、正文和結(jié)語三個部分。其中正文由四章組成。 前言主要介紹了立嗣的起源、界定了立嗣的概念,先行解決有關立嗣的基本問題,以方便后文直接對宋代立嗣制度展開具體的論述。 第一章對宋代立嗣制度系統(tǒng)化的原因進行了分析,試圖找出宋代大量頒布有關立嗣律令的理由。同時也通過原因的分析,力圖讓人了解立嗣對于宋代社會的重要性。 第二章和第三章對宋代立嗣制度的內(nèi)容進行了全面的介紹。從最基本的立嗣主、客體規(guī)定到富有特色的主、客體變更等立嗣程序的規(guī)定,宋代立嗣制度的內(nèi)容包括了實體法和程序法兩部分,其系統(tǒng)化和完備化由此可見一般。 第四章則是通過與其他各朝代的比較,著重論述宋代立嗣制度中包含的變革性內(nèi)容,并在特定的歷史條件下尋找變革產(chǎn)生的實質(zhì)。由此,對宋代立嗣制度進行了全方位的考察。 結(jié)語部分重申了立嗣對于整個中國古代社會的重要性。并對宋代立嗣制度承前啟后的作用進行了交代,突出了宋代在立嗣發(fā)展過程中的重要地位。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the patriarchal clan system in the Western Zhou Dynasty, and under the influence of the concept of blood and food, the principle of "the principal sacrifice of a large number of sons" has been followed, and as a social custom, it has mounted on the stage of history. At first, In the aristocratic family, there were only the aristocratic families. "A large number of children of the small clan became the next." although the descendants were born on the basis of ancestral sacrifices, the appearance of the heir also played a role in safeguarding the hierarchical system of the noble extended family. In the Qin and Han dynasties, As a result of the long term influence of the war, the clan was lost, and everyone was a sect, so the issue became a matter for all the common people's families. Since then, the idea of the heir has been deeply rooted in the people's heart, and as a safeguard for the patriarchal system, it has not only continued the dominant position of the feudal ethics, It also played an important role in the maintenance and consolidation of China's feudal system. Before the Tang Dynasty, however, the heir was only a folk custom, influenced by the traditional rites, but not regulated by the law. Whether the act of establishing the heir was appropriate was judged by the Confucian scriptures and social customs, and there was no relevant provision in the law. Naturally, there was no basis for judgment and punishment. The Tang Dynasty appeared for the first time a legal provision on the issue of heirs, but only a simple stipulation was made on the issue of heirs, which could not form a complete system. Until the Song Dynasty, On the basis of following the laws of the Tang Dynasty and combining with the social and economic environment of that time, a series of laws and decrees related to the establishment of the heir were formulated. Under the mutual influence and function of law, custom and etiquette, especially the change of the concept of litigation, The gradual systematization and perfection of the heir system laid a solid foundation for the continued development of the inheritance system in the Ming and Qing dynasties. In view of the interaction between the heir and the traditional patriarchal concept, and the important role of the heir in the development of the feudal society as a whole in ancient China, It is of great significance to choose the Song Dynasty, which is devoted to strengthening the feudal autocratic centralization and Confucian rule, to explore the formation and content of the heir system, which is of great significance to the study of the development and function of the inheritance system in the whole ancient society. This paper consists of three parts: preface, text and conclusion, in which the text is composed of four chapters. The preface mainly introduces the origin of the heir, defines the concept of the heir, and solves the basic problem of the issue in advance, so as to facilitate the specific exposition of the system of the heir in the Song Dynasty. The first chapter analyzes the reasons for the systematization of the succession system in the Song Dynasty, and tries to find out the reasons for the promulgation of a large number of legal orders on the issue in the Song Dynasty. At the same time, through the analysis of the reasons, the author tries to make people understand the importance of the heir to the society of the Song Dynasty. The second and third chapters give a comprehensive introduction to the content of the heir system in the Song Dynasty. From the most basic provisions of the heir owner, the object stipulation to the characteristic subject and object change and so on, the provisions of the heirship procedure. The content of the system includes two parts: substantive law and procedural law. The fourth chapter is through the comparison with the other dynasties, emphatically discusses the reform content contained in the system of the heir in the Song Dynasty, and looks for the essence of the change under the specific historical conditions. This paper makes an all-round investigation on the system of establishing heir in the Song Dynasty. The conclusion part restates the importance of the heir to the whole ancient Chinese society, and explains the function of the inheritance system in the Song Dynasty, which highlights the important position of the Song Dynasty in the process of the development of the heir.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D929;K244

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張文勇;;論宋代司法官員的調(diào)處藝術[J];江漢論壇;2010年02期

2 王麗麗;;宋代社會的奢靡之風[J];學理論;2010年05期

3 張文勇;;“以人為本”思想與宋代法制[J];五邑大學學報(社會科學版);2010年01期

4 張文勇;;論宋代民事審判的時代特點[J];蘭州學刊;2010年02期

5 李智萍;;宋代女戶的特點[J];婦女研究論叢;2009年06期

6 田志光;;21世紀初(2001～2008年)宋代法律史研究趨向述評[J];研究生法學;2009年04期

7 范勇;鄭志強;;宋代社會救災制度及其對當代社會保障的啟示[J];華東交通大學學報;2010年02期

8 周國平;;宋代幕僚入幕原因、途徑及其離幕[J];西安外事學院學報;2006年04期

9 陳志英;;社會變革與宋代民事法的發(fā)展[J];河北法學;2006年05期

10 董劭偉;鹿軍;;宋代偽造官文書犯罪透析[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟學院學報;2006年06期

相關會議論文 前4條

1 王善軍;;宋代世家大族的藏書及其對成員的教育[A];中國古代社會與思想文化研究論集——全國首屆東周文明學術研討會論文集[C];2004年

2 王善軍;;宋代世家大族的起家和主要類型[A];中國古代社會與思想文化研究論集（第三輯）[C];2008年

3 王齊洲;;《水滸傳》是描寫農(nóng)民起義的作品嗎?[A];水滸爭鳴（第一輯）[C];1982年

4 李楠;;宋代李覯田制思想述評[A];2005中國制度經(jīng)濟學年會精選論文（第二部分）[C];2005年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 方明;《萬千氣象的宋代社會風貌》[N];中國教師報;2005年

2 高楠;從四類消費看宋代[N];光明日報;2007年

3 郭婭;試論宋代童蒙教育的大眾化[N];光明日報;2006年

4 關衛(wèi)東;文案勺 逝去的風雅[N];中國商報;2006年

5 冽瑋;陜西發(fā)現(xiàn)宋代高僧涅i帽諢筟N];西部時報;2009年

6 王曾瑜;詩意中的商業(yè) 商業(yè)中的詩意[N];光明日報;2007年

7 虞云國;“中國社會中心南移”的最早提出[N];東方早報;2010年

8 丁海燕;宋人筆記的史學價值[N];光明日報;2003年

9 呂桓宇;清明上河園之力(上)[N];河南日報;2007年

10 小濤;厚重的古代小說論叢[N];中國郵政報;2005年

相關博士學位論文 前10條

1 馬泓波;《宋會要輯稿·刑法》整理與研究[D];陜西師范大學;2005年

2 李小紅;巫覡與宋代社會[D];浙江大學;2004年

3 夏時華;宋代香藥業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究[D];陜西師范大學;2012年

4 鄭迎光;宋代地方社會治安問題初探[D];河北大學;2007年

5 楊永兵;宋代買撲制度研究[D];云南大學;2010年

6 侯佳;中書舍人與北宋詩文研究[D];河南大學;2012年

7 王朝陽;宋代士人經(jīng)商研究[D];陜西師范大學;2011年

8 劉欣;宋代家訓研究[D];云南大學;2010年

9 張利;宋代司法文化中的“人文精神”[D];河北大學;2008年

10 石瑞麗;宋代官營工商業(yè)競價機制研究[D];陜西師范大學;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 顧e，

本文編號：1675004