博學(xué)鴻儒與清初學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)變
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-17 10:54
本文選題:博學(xué)鴻儒 切入點:清初 出處:《華中師范大學(xué)》2004年博士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:博學(xué)鴻儒科,又稱己未詞科,是康熙十八年清政府為了籠絡(luò)山林隱逸和名儒碩彥而增開的一個特殊的制科,用以消弭士人與清廷的對抗情緒,達到穩(wěn)定統(tǒng)治的目的?滴醯勖x上是崇儒右文、優(yōu)選博學(xué)淵通之士,實際上是為了網(wǎng)羅有影響的士人。己未科基本上達到了清廷的目的,同時,也聚集了一大批文詞卓越、博通經(jīng)史之士及理學(xué)、經(jīng)濟之才。他們會聚京城,纂修《明史》,經(jīng)筵日講,無異于一次學(xué)術(shù)盛會。鴻儒與其他學(xué)者一道,彼此交流、互相探討,有效地促進了學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展。 明末清初,風(fēng)云變幻,各種思潮諸如異端思想、實學(xué)運動、復(fù)古考據(jù)之風(fēng)、經(jīng)世致用精神、民族主義、修正王學(xué)等不斷涌現(xiàn),氣象萬千,思想學(xué)術(shù)進入了由理學(xué)向經(jīng)史考據(jù)之學(xué)的轉(zhuǎn)變過程。明清易代,明朝遺老顧炎武、黃宗羲等人倡導(dǎo)樸實的學(xué)風(fēng),開啟了清代的經(jīng)史之學(xué)。到乾嘉時期,經(jīng)史考據(jù),風(fēng)靡學(xué)界。從顧、黃等大師到乾嘉學(xué)者,中間幾十年的時間,經(jīng)歷了怎樣的學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)換和承接過程?由誰來具體承接?本篇以為,以博學(xué)鴻儒為代表的一代學(xué)者,正是他們,順應(yīng)學(xué)術(shù)思想發(fā)展的潮流,承上啟下,完成了由理學(xué)向經(jīng)學(xué)的轉(zhuǎn)換,由通經(jīng)致用之學(xué)向經(jīng)史考據(jù)之學(xué)的轉(zhuǎn)化。經(jīng)過他們的倡導(dǎo)和努力,學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)更加清晰,經(jīng)史考據(jù)之學(xué)逐步登堂入室。 本篇從三個大的方面來探討康熙時期的博學(xué)鴻儒及其與清初學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)變的關(guān)系問題。 首先,通過考察博學(xué)鴻儒群體審視士人與清廷的關(guān)系,探尋促成學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)變的外在因素。在明清易代的背景下,激于義憤的士人形成了呼喚傳統(tǒng)道德、不趨奉朝廷和流俗、重視讀書問學(xué)的士林風(fēng)氣?滴醯蹫榱讼羰咳藢Τ⒌膶骨榫w,為了穩(wěn)定在全國的統(tǒng)治,調(diào)整了文化政策,于康熙十八年征召博學(xué)鴻儒。增開此科,康熙帝極盡籠絡(luò)之能事,百般優(yōu)遇應(yīng)薦士人,基本達到目的。從此,士人處于朝廷的有效控制之下。在康熙帝與鴻儒的交涉中,他采用懷柔政策,恩威并用;在文化政策上,他接受漢族先進的文化,崇儒重道,掌控士人言論。并且,他還將宋明理學(xué)進行改造,加以利用,用來制掣士人,使之處于“失語”的狀態(tài)。因此,群英薈萃的鴻儒群體中,理學(xué)、經(jīng)濟、詞章、考據(jù)、德化無不具備,但他們在朝廷控制下,落英繽紛。最終只有經(jīng)史博學(xué)之士,得以材盡其用,這充分顯示了朝廷在學(xué)術(shù)導(dǎo)向上的作用。鴻儒在朝廷的安排下,纂修《明史》,經(jīng)筵日講,在學(xué)術(shù)上作出了較大貢獻,對清朝文化政策產(chǎn)生了重要影響,也反映出朝廷對士人的思想控制趨向。 第二部分,通過對鴻儒代表的個案研究,論述其學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)換的軌跡和所起作用。明末清初學(xué)術(shù)思潮,在多元發(fā)展中,凸顯了黜虛務(wù)實、崇尚經(jīng)學(xué)的主脈。在這種學(xué)術(shù)思想的大背景下,鴻儒一代學(xué)人在明清之際學(xué)術(shù)大師首倡下,積極倡導(dǎo)轉(zhuǎn)變學(xué)風(fēng),從事研經(jīng)讀史的務(wù)實學(xué)問。湯斌代表了鴻儒中的理學(xué)人士,他順應(yīng)實學(xué)的形勢,主張調(diào)和朱、王,不辨門戶,為理學(xué)增添了實 馨 博士學(xué)位論文 DOCTORALDISSER毛價,ION 行、務(wù)實的內(nèi)容,注重躬行實踐;同時,他開始倡導(dǎo)讀經(jīng),研究經(jīng)典、傳注,,促進了理學(xué)向經(jīng) 學(xué)方向的轉(zhuǎn)變。朱彝尊是受江南地區(qū)濃厚的學(xué)術(shù)氛圍熏染的學(xué)者,具有良好的古學(xué)功底,博學(xué) 多才。他倡導(dǎo)健實的學(xué)風(fēng),循著由小學(xué)入經(jīng)學(xué)的路徑,研經(jīng),考史,成為與顧炎武、閻若球并 肩比踵的清初考據(jù)學(xué)的開啟者。他在金石學(xué)、目錄學(xué)等領(lǐng)域的建樹,為經(jīng)學(xué)的發(fā)展鋪平了道路。 潘來是顧炎武的及門弟子,一方面他沿著顧炎武所指引的經(jīng)學(xué)路徑研究金石、音韻,其編纂明 史的有關(guān)思想己蘊涵了考據(jù)學(xué)的特征;另一方面受江南地區(qū)實學(xué)運動的影響,他又努力去推動 歷算學(xué)、醫(yī)學(xué)等實學(xué)的研究工作。潘來成為清初學(xué)者中深入經(jīng)學(xué)領(lǐng)域的重要代表。毛奇齡是清 初典型的由理學(xué)向經(jīng)學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)化的縮影。他是理學(xué)營壘中的王學(xué)后人,將理學(xué)中的門戶之爭轉(zhuǎn)移到 了經(jīng)學(xué)領(lǐng)域。晚年,他以經(jīng)學(xué)為己任,促使明清之際博大恢弘的經(jīng)世致用之學(xué)向經(jīng)史之學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)變。 他對宋儒朱子的批判,揭開了考據(jù)學(xué)者批判理學(xué)的序幕。毛奇齡應(yīng)該是鴻儒中對乾嘉學(xué)派影響 最大的學(xué)者。 第三部分,‘綜論博學(xué)鴻儒在清初學(xué)術(shù)中承上啟下的轉(zhuǎn)變作用。首先從鴻儒的“歸隱心態(tài)”、 康熙帝的文化政策兩方面分析促成清初學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)變的外在因素。結(jié)合時代背景,分析鴻儒學(xué)人在 學(xué)術(shù)研究宗旨、研究內(nèi)容、治學(xué)態(tài)度、學(xué)術(shù)規(guī)范等方面對明清之際諸大師的繼承和轉(zhuǎn)變,其中 包括經(jīng)世致用、民族思潮潛移轉(zhuǎn)化的原因。接著,從尊宋抑漢的學(xué)術(shù)傾向、禮學(xué)的研究與踐履、 對宋明理學(xué)的批判三個方面,論述鴻儒學(xué)人在轉(zhuǎn)變中所起的作用,側(cè)重其對乾嘉學(xué)者的影響。 結(jié)語部分論述了鴻儒學(xué)人在清學(xué)史上的地位和貢獻,指出他們是介于明清之際嘗術(shù)大師和乾嘉 學(xué)者之間的一竹學(xué)人,其對學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)變的學(xué)術(shù)作用不容忽視,其學(xué)術(shù)貢獻也頗有價值。 關(guān)鍵詞:博學(xué)鴻儒清初學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)換士人康熙
[Abstract]:Erudite examination, also called special examinations of 1679, Kangxi is eighteen years of the Qing government in order to win over the Mingru and recluse michihiko increased number of a special system, to eliminate the antagonism with the Qing Dynasty scholar, stabilize the purpose of the rule of emperor Kangxi. The name is the optimal selection of erudite Confucian worship, Yuan Tong who is actually in order to recruit influential scholars. Science has basically reached the goal, at the same time, also gathered a large number of literary excellence, scholar and Broadcom through the history of science, Jingjizhicai. They gather in Beijing, compiling < > Ming, Jingyan daystresses, is tantamount to an academic event. Ru and other scholars together, communicate with each other, mutual study, effectively promoted the academic development.
The late Ming and early Qing Dynasty, various thoughts such as heresy amidst the winds of change, and the pragmatic movement, retro textual style, spirit of statecraft, nationalism, Wang correction are emerging, majestic and grand entered by the academic thoughts, science and shift to textual criticism. The Ming and Qing Dynasties, the Ming Dynasty Wang Gu Yanwu, Huang Zongxi, et al. Advocating simple style in the Qing Dynasty, opened the classics. To the period of Qianlong, through textual research, popular in academia. From Gu, Huang and other masters to scholars, several decades of time, the academic experience how to transform and undertake the process? Who is to undertake specific? This article thinks, to the learned scholars as the representative of a generation scholars, it is they, conform to the trend of the development of academic thought, nexus, completed by the science to classics, from the classics into use learn to history textual research. Through advocacy and their efforts, academic development Clear history of textual criticism step up.
This article discusses the relationship between the Kangxi period from three aspects of the learned scholars and its transformation and early Qing academic.
First, look at the relationship between the intellectuals and the Qing learned scholars through the study groups, to explore the external factors contributed to academic change. In the background of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, scholars formed excited indignation at the call of the traditional morality, not fawn on the court and vulgar, attention to reading and learning. At that time the emperor Kangxi in order to eliminate the scholar of the court the emotional confrontation, in order to stabilize the rule, adjust the cultural policy in the eighteen years of Kangxi called the learned scholars. To open this branch, as the emperor Kangxi can win, a variety of preferential treatment should be recommended scholars, basically achieve the purpose. From then on, the scholar in the court under effective control. In the negotiations of emperor Kangxi and the Ru and he adopted the policy of appeasement, in cultural policy, apply the carrot and stick judiciously; he accepted the advanced Han culture, advocating Confucianism, the control of speech. And he will also Neo Confucianism transformation, to use, to guard the, So in the "Aphasia" of the state. Therefore, the west of the scholar group, science, economy, literature, textual research, Dehua has all, but they are in the government under the control of Fallen petals lie in profusion., ultimately only as a learned scholar, to make the best use of materials, which fully shows the government plays a leading role in learning. In the court. Hongru arrangement, compiling < > Ming, Jingyan daystresses, academic made a greater contribution, has an important influence on the cultural policy, but also reflects the trend of scholars thought control.
The second part, based on the case study on the representative scholar, academic transformation trajectory and the role played by the late Ming Dynasty and early Qing Dynasty. The academic trend, in the diversified development, highlights to pragmatic, advocate the main vein of science. In the background of the academic thought, Hongru a generation in the Ming and Qing Dynasties academic the master initiated, actively promote the transformation of the style of study, research in the down-to-earth learning. Tang Bin represents the people of science scholar, he complied with the real situation, Zhu Wang, advocates harmony, as science does not distinguish the portal, add.
Xin
PhD thesis
DOCTORALDISSER gross price, ION
For practical content, at the same time, he began to practise personally what one preaches; advocate reading, study the classics, annotations, promote science to the
瀛︽柟鍚戠殑杞彉.鏈卞綕灝婃槸鍙楁睙鍗楀湴鍖烘祿鍘氱殑瀛︽湳姘涘洿鐔忔煋鐨勫鑰
本文編號:1624428
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1624428.html