本文以中美主流媒體關(guān)于“一帶一路”的新聞報(bào)道為語料,以評(píng)價(jià)理論的態(tài)度系統(tǒng)為理論框架,對(duì)報(bào)道中態(tài)度資源的運(yùn)用進(jìn)行了比較研究,然后從批評(píng)話語分析視角對(duì)其異同進(jìn)行解讀,從而揭示其背后隱藏的意識(shí)形態(tài)。通過定量、定性分析發(fā)現(xiàn),兩組語料中關(guān)于“一帶一路”的話語使用了態(tài)度資源的全部三個(gè)分支,包括情感,判斷和鑒賞資源。此外,兩者使用的情感資源最少,表明雙方報(bào)道都符合新聞報(bào)道的客觀性,避免過多的主觀情感表達(dá)。不同點(diǎn)在于,中國主流媒體傾向于使用鑒賞資源展示“一帶一路”倡議的重要性和社會(huì)價(jià)值。美國主流媒體多使用判斷資源評(píng)判“一帶一路”倡議的可行性。該部分的研究主要從宏觀角度呈現(xiàn)兩國主流媒體所選取話語中態(tài)度資源分布的情況。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文從微觀角度進(jìn)一步討論了態(tài)度資源三個(gè)分支資源使用情況的異同。分析發(fā)現(xiàn),兩者使用最多的情感資源是安全/不安全資源。不同點(diǎn)在于,判斷資源方面,中國主流媒體使用最多的是才能資源,而美國主流媒體則傾向于使用正當(dāng)資源。鑒賞資源方面,中國主流媒體使用最多的是價(jià)值資源,而美國主流媒體則使用了較多的構(gòu)成資源。此外,中國主流媒體所選話語中的積極資源多于消極資源,而美國主流媒體則相反。兩國主流媒體...

【文章頁數(shù)】：88 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
    1.3 The Organization of the Research
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 An Overview of Appraisal Theory
        2.1.1 The Development of Appraisal Theory
        2.1.2 The Application of Appraisal Theory
        2.1.3 Subsystem of the Appraisal Theory: Attitude System
    2.2 An Overview of Discourse Analysis
        2.2.1 The Development of Discourse Analysis
        2.2.2 From Discourse Analysis to Critical Discourse Analysis
    2.3 An Overview of News Discourse
        2.3.1 Previous Studies on News Discourse Abroad and at Home
        2.3.2 Previous Studies on the Belt and Road Initiative News Reports
    2.4 Research Gap
Chapter 3 Research Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Data Collection
    3.3 Research Instrument
    3.4 Research Methods and Procedures
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 A Comparative Study of the Distribution of the Attitudinal Resources
        4.1.1 Similarities and Differences in the General Distribution of the Attitudinal Resources
        4.1.2 Similarities and Differences in the Distribution of Polarity and Explicitness
    4.2 A Comparative Study of the Employment of Attitudinal Resources
        4.2.1 Similarities and Differences in the Employment of Affect
        4.2.2 Similarities and Differences in the Employment of Judgement
        4.2.3 Similarities and Differences in the Employment of Appreciation
        4.2.4 Similarities and Differences in the Polarity and Explicitness of Attitudinal Resources
    4.3 Factors Contributing to the Similarities and Differences: From the Perspective of CDA
        4.3.1 CDA Perspective Interpretation of the Similarities and Differences
        4.3.2 The Interpretation of News Discourse: CDA Perspective Discussion
Chapter 5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings of the Study
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
作者簡歷及攻讀碩士學(xué)位期間的科研成果



本文編號(hào)：3928695