本文利用AntConc統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件研究中美“一帶一路”新聞?wù)Z篇中介入資源的分布情況,并結(jié)合語(yǔ)境探究中美兩國(guó)關(guān)于“一帶一路”倡議的立場(chǎng)和觀點(diǎn),選取了 2013年9月至2017年5月發(fā)表于《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》、《環(huán)球時(shí)報(bào)》、《華盛頓郵報(bào)》、《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》的78篇英文新聞?wù)Z篇,共計(jì)55396字(其中中方英文版新聞27613字,美方新聞27783字)。研究表明中美關(guān)于“一帶一路”的報(bào)道中存在大量介入資源,而兩國(guó)對(duì)于“一帶一路”倡議的立場(chǎng)截然不同。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),中方新聞中對(duì)話(huà)性擴(kuò)展的頻率是對(duì)話(huà)性壓縮的四倍,但是美方新聞中兩者出現(xiàn)的頻率相當(dāng)。在對(duì)話(huà)性擴(kuò)展中,兩國(guó)媒體都傾向于使用情態(tài)動(dòng)詞來(lái)表達(dá)包容資源,中方媒體主要表達(dá)對(duì)“一帶一路”未來(lái)的期望而美方媒體則不看好其發(fā)展;同時(shí),歸屬資源中中方媒體傾向于使用領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的權(quán)威話(huà)語(yǔ)來(lái)降低對(duì)話(huà)性,而美方媒體更多地使用普通人的外部話(huà)語(yǔ)表達(dá)對(duì)“一帶一路”的反對(duì),以此打開(kāi)對(duì)話(huà)性。在對(duì)話(huà)性壓縮中,否認(rèn)資源和反預(yù)期資源在中美媒體中出現(xiàn)的頻率相當(dāng),但是中方媒體通過(guò)否定西方話(huà)語(yǔ)來(lái)強(qiáng)調(diào)美方愿意加入“一帶一路”倡議,而美方媒體則總是在否定“一帶一路”的可行性。宣告資源是介入資源中最少的,但是中美媒體仍...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：80 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Studies of News Discourse
        2.1.1 Previous Studies of News Discourse Abroad
        2.1.2 Previous Studies of News Discourse at Home
    2.2 Studies of Appraisal Theory
        2.2.1 Previous Studies of Appraisal Theory Abroad
        2.2.2 Previous Studies of Appraisal Theory at Home
    2.3 Research Gap
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Appraisal Theory
    3.2 Engagement Resources
        3.2.1 Monogloss
        3.2.2 Heterogloss
        3.2.3 Dialogic Expansion and Dialogic Contraction
Chapter Four Data and Methodology
    4.1 Data Collection
    4.2 Research Questions
    4.3 Instrument, Approaches and Procedures
Chapter Five Analysis of Engagement Resources
    5.1 Distribution of Engagement Resources
    5.2 Comparison between Engagement Resources in the American and ChineseNews Reports
        5.2.1 Similarities and Differences between Dialogic Expansion in the American and Chinese News Reports
        5.2.2 Similarities and Differences between Dialogic Contraction in the American and Chinese News Reports
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Study
    6.2 Limitations of the Study
    6.3 Suggestions for the Further Research
References
Appendix Ⅰ News Corpu
Appendix Ⅱ Examples in the Corpus
Acknowledgements
在校論文成果



本文編號(hào)：3797455