印度火電市場保函風險分析與應對措施研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-07 23:24
本文選題:印度 + 火電市場 ; 參考:《西南交通大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:經濟全球化的大背景下,銀行見索即付獨立保函作為一種銀行信用擔保形式,因其特有的獨立性、單據(jù)化、高效、可靠等特征深受買方和銀行的青睞,被廣泛應用于國際貿易的各個領域。隨著中國推出"一帶一路"這一政治經濟戰(zhàn)略,印度因其在戰(zhàn)略上無可替代的重要地位以及在火電市場呈現(xiàn)出的巨大潛力,成為中國電力輸出的重要市場。然而,幾乎所有的中國電力企業(yè)在"走出去"進程中,都曾在印度市場陷入"困局",許多中國企業(yè)開具的銀行見索即付保函在項目完工收尾階段或被印方業(yè)主索償、或被印方業(yè)主用之為談判籌碼要求中方承包商在合同爭議上做出妥協(xié)和讓步。保函風險已成為廣大中國電力企業(yè)在印度執(zhí)行項目的軟肋,使其在談判中處于被動地位,極易給企業(yè)造成經濟損失。因此,在攻克這塊誘人卻又"難啃"的"大蛋糕"時,針對印度火電市場特點和保函在印度的獨有特征,研究保函風險防范及應對措施刻不容緩。本文首先介紹了見索即付保函的含義、興起背景、特征和開立方式等基本理論;同時指出國內火電市場正不斷萎縮、行業(yè)面臨嚴峻的產能過剩問題,印度因其對電力需求的穩(wěn)步增長,將成為中國電力出口的重要市場。隨后,對見索即付保函在印度火電市場應用中的風險進行了識別和分析,并總結出五個方面的保函風險防范措施。其次,結合D公司兩個印度火電項目的案例,介紹了保函在面臨索償威脅時可采用的兩種風險應對措施——國際仲裁、和解,并分別對著兩種方式進行了評價和實際應用分析,得出在印度執(zhí)行的項目通過發(fā)起國際仲裁解決爭議,將耗費大量時間和資源,并且結果充滿不確定性,認為中國承包商應綜合考慮可索賠利益、爭議解決時間的和成本費用等因素選用恰當?shù)臓幾h解決方式。最后,論文提出了兩種保函風險應對措施的新思路,認為中國承包商可從進一步明確保函索賠期含義和爭取中國法院司法管轄權兩方面進行探索,增加途徑化解保函被索償風險。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization, as a form of bank credit guarantee, the independent guarantee on demand is favored by buyers and banks because of its unique characteristics of independence, documentation, efficiency and reliability. It is widely used in various fields of international trade. With the introduction of "Belt and Road" as a political and economic strategy in China, India has become an important market for China's electricity export because of its irreplaceable strategic importance and its enormous potential in the thermal power market. However, in the process of "going out", almost all Chinese power enterprises have been in a "difficult situation" in the Indian market. Many Chinese enterprises have issued bank guarantees at the end of the completion stage of the project or have been claimed by the Indian owners. Or used by the Indian owners as bargaining chips to require Chinese contractors to compromise and compromise on contract disputes. The risk of guarantee has become the weakness of the Chinese electric power enterprises to carry out projects in India, which makes them in a passive position in the negotiations and can easily cause economic losses to the enterprises. Therefore, it is urgent to study the risk prevention and countermeasures in view of the characteristics of Indian thermal power market and the unique characteristics of guarantee in India. This paper first introduces the meaning, background, characteristics and opening method of the demand guarantee, and points out that the domestic thermal power market is shrinking, and the industry is facing severe overcapacity problem. India will become an important market for China's electricity exports because of its steady growth in demand for electricity. Then, the paper identifies and analyzes the risk in the application of pay-as-you-go guarantee in Indian thermal power market, and summarizes five measures to prevent the risk of guarantee. Secondly, combined with the case of two Indian thermal power projects of company D, this paper introduces two kinds of risk countermeasures that can be adopted in the face of the threat of claim of compensation-international arbitration, settlement, and the evaluation and practical application analysis of the two ways, respectively. To conclude that the project implemented in India to resolve disputes through the initiation of international arbitration would be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and that the results would be uncertain, and that Chinese contractors should take into account the interests that can be claimed, The time and cost of dispute settlement should be chosen. Finally, the paper puts forward two new ways to deal with the risk of guarantee, and points out that the Chinese contractor can further clarify the meaning of the guarantee claim period and strive for the jurisdiction of the Chinese court. Increase the means to resolve the risk of claims by the guarantee.
【學位授予單位】:西南交通大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D735.1;F416.61
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 林森;李志永;劉俊穎;;國際工程項目中見索即付保函實務及案例[J];國際經濟合作;2016年09期
2 傅莎;鄒驥;;“十三五”煤電零增長也能滿足中國未來電力需求[J];世界環(huán)境;2016年04期
3 陳斌;;如何應對業(yè)主惡意兌現(xiàn)保函[J];國際工程與勞務;2016年05期
4 林一;;國際工程承包業(yè)主保函欺詐的應對與防范[J];國際經濟合作;2014年03期
5 梅強;許紅珍;;再擔保體系內銀保風險共擔研究——基于系統(tǒng)動力學[J];技術經濟與管理研究;2014年02期
6 孫淼;姜堯;;銀行保函適用的國際慣例及適用時應注意的問題[J];經濟研究導刊;2014年05期
7 任榮強;郝娜;;淺談印度電建項目分包管理過程中如何做好合同管理工作[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)家;2013年08期
8 金春華;呂文學;;不可抗力下國際工程保函風險分析[J];國際經濟合作;2011年10期
9 王資權;;EPC模式下的項目合同風險管理初探[J];經濟研究導刊;2011年13期
10 周輝斌;國際銀行保函欺詐產生的原因及其法律認定[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2001年02期
,本文編號:1858936
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/ydyl/1858936.html
最近更新
教材專著