發(fā)布時間：2018-03-06 19:46

  本文選題：東盟　切入點：經(jīng)濟(jì)制度　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的興起,國際直接投資呈現(xiàn)出快速發(fā)展的態(tài)勢。改革開放以來,中國經(jīng)濟(jì)得到了迅速的發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟(jì)實力不斷提高,跟隨經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的潮流,中國政府先后貫徹實施“走出去”和“一帶一路”發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,鼓勵有能力和有條件的企業(yè)對外直接投資。近年來,我國對外直接投資取得了很好的成績。2016年我國境內(nèi)投資者向境外7961家企業(yè)進(jìn)行了非金融直接投資,共涉足全球164個國家或地區(qū),實現(xiàn)對外投資額高達(dá)1701.1億美元,同比增長44.1%。中國日益崛起,如今中國已成為世界第二投資國,意味著中國資本布局全球新時代的到來,成為全球投資市場強大的力量。自2010年中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)(CAFTA)正式成立,極大地促進(jìn)了雙方經(jīng)貿(mào)往來,為中國企業(yè)在東盟直接投資提供了無限機遇,推動中國對東盟直接投資的發(fā)展。2015年,我國對東盟直接投資增長速度飛快,投資流量首次突破百億美元達(dá)到146.04億美元,同比增長87%;投資國別分布多變,對新加坡的投資又創(chuàng)新高;投資領(lǐng)域不斷擴展,行業(yè)遍布東盟各國;投資主體趨于多元化,更多民營企業(yè)走出國門。2016年,是中國與東盟建立對話關(guān)系25周年,處于雙方合作的“鉆石十年”期間,伴隨著政府展開的“一帶一路”發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,我國對東盟直接投資正面臨史上絕無的機遇。但是,在飛速發(fā)展的同時,我國對東盟直接投資存在一些問題:存在國別差異、行業(yè)分布不均、總體規(guī)模較小、占我國總體比率低等,制約著投資的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,亟待解決。本文利用中國對外直接投資數(shù)據(jù)庫2003-2015年東盟國家的面板數(shù)據(jù),基于經(jīng)濟(jì)制度視角,運用萬有引力模型考察東盟經(jīng)濟(jì)制度對我國對其直接投資的影響,實證結(jié)果表明有顯著的影響。其中反腐制度、營商制度、貿(mào)易制度、投資制度、金融制度對我國對東盟直接投資規(guī)模有正向的影響:東盟國家嚴(yán)格的經(jīng)濟(jì)法規(guī),良好的營商環(huán)境,開放的投資市場為我國跨國企業(yè)生產(chǎn)和發(fā)展提供良好的經(jīng)營環(huán)境,從而擴大了投資規(guī)模;政府控制支出制度有負(fù)向的影響:政府支出促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長,給我國帶來投資的機遇;貨幣制度的影響不顯著:東道國貨幣制度不是我國對東盟國家投資的主要考慮因素。本文還采用Hendry“一般到特殊”的逐步回歸分析法,比較經(jīng)濟(jì)子制度對我國對東盟直接投資影響程度的強弱,其中影響最強的是政府控制支出制度,隨后依次是反腐敗制度、金融制度、營商制度、貿(mào)易制度、投資制度、貨幣制度。最后根據(jù)研究結(jié)果提出本文的建議,政府層面:構(gòu)建對東盟投資的信息服務(wù)體系,加強中國與東盟的友好合作關(guān)系,大力支持東盟共同體的發(fā)展建設(shè),加強與建立跨國企業(yè)的保障制度;企業(yè)層面:系統(tǒng)調(diào)查東盟經(jīng)濟(jì)制度與市場,加強和東盟華商、華人的合作,投資東盟國家與領(lǐng)域要多元化,健全跨國企業(yè)制度和管理體系。
[Abstract]:With the rise of global economic integration and regional economic integration, international direct investment (FDI) has shown a rapid development trend. Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has been developing rapidly, and its economic strength has been continuously improved. Following the trend of economic globalization, the Chinese government has successively implemented the development strategy of "going out" and "Belt and Road" to encourage foreign direct investment of competent and qualified enterprises. In 2016, China's domestic investors made non-financial direct investment to 7961 enterprises overseas, and they set foot in 164 countries or regions in the world, with a total of US $170.11 billion in foreign investment. China has become the second largest investor in the world, meaning a new era of global capital distribution in China. It has become a powerful force in the global investment market. Since the establishment of CAFTAA in 2010, it has greatly promoted economic and trade exchanges between the two sides and provided unlimited opportunities for Chinese enterprises to invest directly in ASEAN. In 2015, China's direct investment in ASEAN grew at a rapid rate, with investment flows reaching fourteen billion six hundred and four million US dollars for the first time, an increase of 87 percent over the same period last year. The investment in Singapore has reached a new high; the investment field is constantly expanding and the industries are spread across ASEAN countries; the investors tend to diversify and more private enterprises go abroad. 2016 marks the 25th anniversary of the establishment of dialogue relations between China and ASEAN. During the "Diamond decade" of bilateral cooperation, along with the development strategy of "Belt and Road" launched by the government, China's direct investment in ASEAN is facing unprecedented opportunities in history. There are some problems in China's direct investment in ASEAN: there are country differences, uneven distribution of industries, small overall scale and low proportion in China, which restricts the further development of investment. In this paper, the panel data of ASEAN countries from 2003-2015 are used to study the influence of ASEAN economic system on China's direct investment in ASEAN, based on the perspective of economic system, and the gravity model is used to investigate the impact of ASEAN economic system on China's direct investment. The empirical results show that there is a significant impact. Among them, anti-corruption system, business system, trade system, investment system and financial system have a positive impact on the scale of China's direct investment in ASEAN: strict economic laws and regulations of ASEAN countries, A good business environment, an open investment market provides a good business environment for the production and development of multinational enterprises in our country, thus expanding the scale of investment; the government expenditure control system has a negative impact: government expenditure promotes economic growth, The influence of the monetary system is not significant: the host country's monetary system is not the main consideration factor of China's investment in ASEAN countries. This paper also adopts the stepwise regression analysis method of Hendry "General to Special". The comparative economic sub-system has a strong and weak impact on China's direct investment in ASEAN, among which the most influential is the government-controlled expenditure system, followed by the anti-corruption system, the financial system, the business system, the trade system, and the investment system. Finally, according to the results of the study, the paper puts forward some suggestions, government level: to build an information service system for investment in ASEAN, to strengthen the friendly and cooperative relations between China and ASEAN, and to vigorously support the development and construction of ASEAN Community. Strengthen and establish the safeguard system of multinational enterprises; Enterprise level: systematic investigation of ASEAN economic system and market, strengthening cooperation with ASEAN Chinese businessmen and Chinese, diversification of investment in ASEAN countries and fields, improvement of multinational enterprise system and management system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鐘飛騰;凡帥帥;;投資環(huán)境評估、東亞發(fā)展與新自由主義的大衰退——以世界銀行營商環(huán)境報告為例[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2016年06期

2 李軒;;中國對東盟直接投資與母國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)聯(lián)性分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2016年09期

3 王永中;趙奇鋒;;風(fēng)險偏好、投資動機與中國對外直接投資:基于面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];金融評論;2016年04期

4 劉敏;劉金山;李雨培;;母國投資動機、東道國制度與企業(yè)對外直接投資區(qū)位選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2016年08期

5 馬述忠;劉夢恒;;中國在“一帶一路”沿線國家OFDI的第三國效應(yīng)研究:基于空間計量方法[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2016年07期

6 趙德森;;中國對東盟投資項目風(fēng)險生成及防控機制——基于東道國利益相關(guān)者的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2016年07期

7 韓玉軍;王麗;撒莉;;服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對出口技術(shù)復(fù)雜度的影響研究——基于OECD國家和中國的經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)考察[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報);2016年03期

8 許真;陳曉飛;;基于擴展的IDP模型的對外直接投資決定因素分析——來自國家面板回歸的證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2016年02期

9 劉再起;王陽;;經(jīng)濟(jì)資源、制度環(huán)境與我國對歐盟直接投資的區(qū)位選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年02期

10 王琳;錢曉英;;制度環(huán)境、投資動機與中國OFDI區(qū)位分布——基于發(fā)達(dá)東道國和發(fā)展中東道國的對比研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2016年02期

，

本文編號：1576222