托勒密王朝早期海軍研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-14 03:18
【摘要】：托勒密王朝早期主要是指托勒密一世和二世統(tǒng)治的時(shí)期，這一時(shí)期是諸侯并立格局形成的重要階段。文章對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)海軍艦艇發(fā)展進(jìn)行了介紹，并以托勒密王朝為例，對(duì)其早期的海軍政策進(jìn)行研究，進(jìn)而分析海軍在希臘化世界中的地位，，并且運(yùn)用近代海軍理論來(lái)分析古代發(fā)展海軍的條件以及優(yōu)勢(shì)，以及其海軍政策產(chǎn)生的影響。 第一章首先介紹了古典時(shí)期和希臘化時(shí)期的戰(zhàn)艦類(lèi)型。古典時(shí)期的代表船只是三列槳戰(zhàn)艦，這種戰(zhàn)艦是希臘化時(shí)期大型戰(zhàn)艦的基礎(chǔ)型。希臘化時(shí)期的大型戰(zhàn)艦是在其三列槳的基礎(chǔ)上改裝而成的，但是漿手排列發(fā)生了變化，由一人一漿發(fā)展成為多人一漿。同時(shí)作戰(zhàn)方式也發(fā)生了相應(yīng)的改變，古典時(shí)期的三列槳戰(zhàn)艦時(shí)代，敵對(duì)雙方主要是利用三列槳很快的移動(dòng)速度，使用船艏的金屬撞角來(lái)撞擊敵艦；而希臘化時(shí)期的大型戰(zhàn)艦則更主要充當(dāng)海上移動(dòng)平臺(tái)的角色，甲板上搭載著重型武器和陸戰(zhàn)士兵，在遠(yuǎn)處首先發(fā)射重武器（石塊、弩炮等），在雙方艦只接近后，甲板上的陸戰(zhàn)士兵則跳上地方艦只進(jìn)行貼身肉搏。 第二章探討了托勒密埃及發(fā)展海軍的原因和有利條件。為了保證埃及本土免受敵人的入侵，拒敵于國(guó)門(mén)之外，同時(shí)保證進(jìn)出口，托勒密都將海軍作為首要發(fā)展的兵種。而且埃及發(fā)展海軍還有相當(dāng)有利的條件，優(yōu)越的地理位置使其較少面臨陸地上的威脅，充足的人口和雄厚的資金也使其比發(fā)展海軍較其他國(guó)家處于更加有利的位置。 第三章探討了托勒密的海軍戰(zhàn)略所引起的一系列反應(yīng)。首先是引起了海軍軍備競(jìng)賽。安提柯的陸軍在希臘化世界首屈一指，但是在與托勒密的爭(zhēng)斗中卻被其海軍牽制，為了達(dá)到政治目的，安提柯父子開(kāi)始大力發(fā)展海軍。而托勒密為了保住自身的海軍優(yōu)勢(shì)，也加大了發(fā)展海軍的速度，進(jìn)而引發(fā)了軍備競(jìng)賽。雖然托勒密最終在軍備競(jìng)賽中勝出，但是卻付出了巨大的代價(jià)：海陸軍比例嚴(yán)重失衡；一種希臘-馬其頓人政策的破產(chǎn)；經(jīng)濟(jì)受到了極大的拖累，并且形成了巨額的貿(mào)易逆差。
[Abstract]:The early Ptolemy Dynasty mainly referred to the period of Ptolemy I and II rule, which was an important stage in the formation of the parallel pattern of princes. This paper introduces the development of naval vessels at that time, and takes the Ptolemy Dynasty as an example to study its early naval policy, and then analyzes the position of the navy in the Greek world, and uses modern naval theory to analyze the conditions and advantages of the development of the navy in ancient times, as well as the influence of its naval policy. The first chapter first introduces the types of warships in the classical period and the Greek period. The representative ships of the classical period were three oar warships, which were the basic types of large warships in the Greek period. The large warships in the Greek period were modified on the basis of their three oars, but the arrangement of pulp hands changed from one person to one pulp. At the same time, the mode of combat has also changed accordingly. In the era of the three oars warships in the classical period, the hostile sides mainly made use of the rapid movement speed of the three oars and used the metal collision angle of the bow to hit the enemy ships. During the Greek period, the large warships mainly acted as the mobile platform at sea, carrying heavy weapons and land soldiers on the deck, first firing heavy weapons (stones, crossbow guns, etc.) in the distance, and when the ships on both sides approached, the land soldiers on the deck jumped on the local ships for hand-to-hand combat. The second chapter discusses the reasons and favorable conditions for the development of the navy in Ptolemy Egypt. In order to protect Egypt from enemy invasion, reject the enemy outside the country, and guarantee import and export, Ptolemy regards the navy as the primary force of development. Moreover, Egypt's development navy is still quite favorable, its superior geographical position makes it less exposed to land threats, and its sufficient population and abundant funds put it in a better position than other countries to develop its navy. The third chapter discusses a series of reactions caused by Ptolemy's naval strategy. First of all, it caused an arms race in the navy. Antioch's army was second to none in the Greek world, but was held back by its navy in its struggle with Ptolemy, and the Antioch and his son began to develop the navy for political ends. In order to maintain his naval advantage, Ptolemy also increased the speed of the development of the navy, which led to an arms race. Although Ptolemy eventually won the arms race, he paid a huge price: a serious imbalance between the sea and army; the bankruptcy of a Greek-Macedonian policy; and the economy was greatly dragged down and created a huge trade deficit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：E153;K411.2
本文編號(hào)：2499056
[Abstract]:The early Ptolemy Dynasty mainly referred to the period of Ptolemy I and II rule, which was an important stage in the formation of the parallel pattern of princes. This paper introduces the development of naval vessels at that time, and takes the Ptolemy Dynasty as an example to study its early naval policy, and then analyzes the position of the navy in the Greek world, and uses modern naval theory to analyze the conditions and advantages of the development of the navy in ancient times, as well as the influence of its naval policy. The first chapter first introduces the types of warships in the classical period and the Greek period. The representative ships of the classical period were three oar warships, which were the basic types of large warships in the Greek period. The large warships in the Greek period were modified on the basis of their three oars, but the arrangement of pulp hands changed from one person to one pulp. At the same time, the mode of combat has also changed accordingly. In the era of the three oars warships in the classical period, the hostile sides mainly made use of the rapid movement speed of the three oars and used the metal collision angle of the bow to hit the enemy ships. During the Greek period, the large warships mainly acted as the mobile platform at sea, carrying heavy weapons and land soldiers on the deck, first firing heavy weapons (stones, crossbow guns, etc.) in the distance, and when the ships on both sides approached, the land soldiers on the deck jumped on the local ships for hand-to-hand combat. The second chapter discusses the reasons and favorable conditions for the development of the navy in Ptolemy Egypt. In order to protect Egypt from enemy invasion, reject the enemy outside the country, and guarantee import and export, Ptolemy regards the navy as the primary force of development. Moreover, Egypt's development navy is still quite favorable, its superior geographical position makes it less exposed to land threats, and its sufficient population and abundant funds put it in a better position than other countries to develop its navy. The third chapter discusses a series of reactions caused by Ptolemy's naval strategy. First of all, it caused an arms race in the navy. Antioch's army was second to none in the Greek world, but was held back by its navy in its struggle with Ptolemy, and the Antioch and his son began to develop the navy for political ends. In order to maintain his naval advantage, Ptolemy also increased the speed of the development of the navy, which led to an arms race. Although Ptolemy eventually won the arms race, he paid a huge price: a serious imbalance between the sea and army; the bankruptcy of a Greek-Macedonian policy; and the economy was greatly dragged down and created a huge trade deficit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：E153;K411.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 陳恒;關(guān)于希臘化時(shí)代的若干問(wèn)題[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年02期
2 郭子林;;論托勒密埃及的專制主義[J];世界歷史;2008年03期
3 維克托·戴維斯·漢森(Victor Davis Hanson),張煜;西方古代軍事史研究現(xiàn)狀綜述[J];軍事歷史研究;2001年01期
本文編號(hào)：2499056
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2499056.html
最近更新
教材專著
