【摘要】： 無論是古代還是現(xiàn)代社會,葬禮作為一種儀式所具備的最主要的功能是紀念和哀悼,在這一點上,古代羅馬人的葬禮也不例外,它是生者向死者告別,寄托哀思、表達尊敬的一種方式。此外,羅馬貴族人物的葬禮還具備特殊的展示和記憶功能。死者生前的榮耀及其家族輝煌的歷史在葬禮的各個環(huán)節(jié)中能夠得到全面的體現(xiàn)。在這種展示之下,羅馬社會特有的政治和家族文化得以彰顯。在共和國最后的一百年,羅馬上層政治充斥著沖突、斗爭和破壞,政治人物葬禮的背后往往透露出不同利益集團之間對權(quán)力的控制和爭奪。本文通過對羅馬共和國末期和帝國早期的貴族喪葬禮儀所作的分析,考察前基督教時代的羅馬人對待死亡和未知世界的一般看法,進而了解家庭與政治生活、個人及公共空間在羅馬公民一生中扮演的角色。同時,通過對羅馬共和國末期和帝國早期的某些政治人物葬禮的解讀,考察在不同政治環(huán)境之下,儀式和權(quán)力之間的微妙關(guān)系及其背后透露出的政治體制變遷。
[Abstract]:In both ancient and modern societies, the most important function of funerals as a ritual is remembrance and mourning. In this respect, the funeral of the ancient Romans was no exception. It was the living saying goodbye to the dead and mourning. A way of expressing respect. In addition, the funeral of Roman aristocrats also has special display and memory functions. The glory of the deceased and the glorious history of his family can be reflected in all aspects of the funeral. Under this display, the unique political and family culture of Roman society was revealed. In the last hundred years of the Republic, Roman politics was rife with conflict, struggle, and destruction, and the funeral of politicians often revealed the control and struggle for power between different interest groups. Through the analysis of the funeral rites of the nobility in the late Roman Republic and the early imperial period, this paper examines the general views of the Romans on death and the unknown world in the pre-Christian era, and then understands the family and political life. The role of individuals and public spaces in the life of Roman citizens. At the same time, through the interpretation of the funeral of some political figures in the late Roman Republic and the early Empire, the subtle relationship between ceremony and power under different political circumstances and the political system changes revealed behind them were investigated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K126

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 晏紹祥;;顯貴還是人民——20世紀初以來有關(guān)羅馬共和國政治生活特點的爭論[J];歷史研究;2008年05期

，

本文編號：2180526