20世紀40年代以來緬甸羅興伽人問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-11 18:13
【摘要】：2008年以來,緬甸羅興伽人問題被網(wǎng)絡和媒體推到了風口浪尖,人們才驚訝的發(fā)現(xiàn),在這個信息高度發(fā)達的時代,羅興伽人的資料多么匱乏和混亂。本文研究的主體“羅興伽人問題”是一個統(tǒng)稱,代指所有與主體民族生活在緬甸若開邦,被稱為“Rohingya”的族群有關的問題�！傲_興伽人”在各國人口的總和最多不超過400萬,是一個比較小的族群,但是這個小族群卻引起了全世界的矚目。關于該族群,幾乎一切說法都未能在國際社會達成共識,“所有觀點都有爭議”是羅興伽人問題研究的最大的魅力所在,盡力理清這個族群的歷史,給這個族群一個準確的定位,是筆者的初心。目前,國內外對羅興伽人問題的討論主要集中在兩個部分:一是二戰(zhàn)之前有關羅興伽人產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的歷史研究;二是2008年羅興伽難民事件發(fā)生之后的事件敘述及引申研究。筆者經(jīng)過研究后發(fā)現(xiàn),學術界對羅興伽人問題討論的時間段劃分是有待商榷的。羅興伽人問題的緣起、發(fā)展、轉變過程恰恰是在20世紀40年代到2008年之間完成的,對這一階段歷史探討的缺失導是致羅興伽人問題難以達成共識的主要原因之一。因此本文圍繞著這一時間段進行重點的研究和討論,力求達到以下突破:第一,準確地定義研究的概念。目前國內外研究對羅興伽人問題的很多概念并沒有達成共識,沒有準確的概念支撐,羅興伽人問題就無法繼續(xù)討論,更談不上如何解決。第二,科學地劃分研究的時間段。即對目前羅興伽人歷史追溯的時間進行更正,本文認為對羅興伽人歷史探討的時間應該是從20世紀40年代開始的,而非主流的7至8世紀或15世紀兩種觀點。第三,詳細地補充研究的資料。對國內文章中20世紀40年代以來至2008年之間歷史資料進行補充,用篩選和考據(jù)的方法引用更多的歷史資料,以彌補緬甸軍政府相對封閉的政策以及西方媒體帶有傾向性的報道所帶來的資料短缺。第四,創(chuàng)新地運用研究的視角。本文從傾向于緬甸政府和羅興伽人這兩個對立的視角切入,以史學理論和考據(jù)法為主要的方法論,同時結合多交叉學科的理論進行分析,研究盡力不人云亦云,力求對20世紀40年代以來羅興伽人歷史敘述的全面性和真實性。
[Abstract]:Since 2008, when the issue of Luo Xing in Myanmar has been brought to the fore by the Internet and the media, people have been surprised to discover how scarce and chaotic the information of the Luo Xing is in this age of highly developed information. The subject of this paper is the Luo Xing problem, which refers to all the problems related to the ethnic groups living in Rakhine State, Myanmar, known as "Rohingya". The "Luo Xing" population of no more than 4 million people in the world is a relatively small group, but this small group has attracted the attention of the world. Almost everything about this group has failed to reach a consensus in the international community. "all views are disputed" is the greatest charm of the Luo Xing study, trying to sort out the history of the group. To give this group an accurate positioning, is the initial heart of the author. At present, the discussion on the issue of Luo Xing people at home and abroad is mainly focused on two parts: first, the historical study on the emergence and development of Luo Xing before World War II; second, the narration and extension of the events after the occurrence of the refugee incident in Luo Xing in 2008. The author finds that the division of the time period of the discussion of the Luo Xing question in academic circles is open to question. The origin, development and transformation of the Luo Xing problem were completed between 1940s and 2008. The lack of guidance in this period is one of the main reasons why it is difficult to reach a consensus on the problem of Luo Xing people. Therefore, this paper focuses on the research and discussion of this period, and tries to achieve the following breakthroughs: first, define the concept of research accurately. At present, there is no consensus on many concepts of the Luo Xing problem at home and abroad, and without accurate conceptual support, there is no way to continue to discuss the Luo Xing problem, let alone how to solve it. Second, divide the time period of research scientifically. That is, to correct the time of tracing back to the history of Luo Xing, this paper holds that the time of discussing the history of Luo Xing should be from 1940s to 1940s, rather than from the mainstream views of 7 to 8 century or 15 century. Third, to supplement the research data in detail. To supplement the historical data from 1940s to 2008 in domestic articles, and to use the method of screening and textual research to quote more historical data. To make up for the military junta's relatively closed policy and Western media with biased reports caused by the lack of information. Fourth, innovative use of the perspective of research. From the angle of view which inclines to the Myanmar government and the Luo Xing people, this paper takes the historical theory and textual research method as the main methodology, at the same time carries on the analysis with the multi-disciplinary theory, studies the best not to follow the others. To strive for the history of the Luo Xing since the 1940s and the authenticity of the narrative.
【學位授予單位】：云南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K337.8
本文編號：2177823
[Abstract]:Since 2008, when the issue of Luo Xing in Myanmar has been brought to the fore by the Internet and the media, people have been surprised to discover how scarce and chaotic the information of the Luo Xing is in this age of highly developed information. The subject of this paper is the Luo Xing problem, which refers to all the problems related to the ethnic groups living in Rakhine State, Myanmar, known as "Rohingya". The "Luo Xing" population of no more than 4 million people in the world is a relatively small group, but this small group has attracted the attention of the world. Almost everything about this group has failed to reach a consensus in the international community. "all views are disputed" is the greatest charm of the Luo Xing study, trying to sort out the history of the group. To give this group an accurate positioning, is the initial heart of the author. At present, the discussion on the issue of Luo Xing people at home and abroad is mainly focused on two parts: first, the historical study on the emergence and development of Luo Xing before World War II; second, the narration and extension of the events after the occurrence of the refugee incident in Luo Xing in 2008. The author finds that the division of the time period of the discussion of the Luo Xing question in academic circles is open to question. The origin, development and transformation of the Luo Xing problem were completed between 1940s and 2008. The lack of guidance in this period is one of the main reasons why it is difficult to reach a consensus on the problem of Luo Xing people. Therefore, this paper focuses on the research and discussion of this period, and tries to achieve the following breakthroughs: first, define the concept of research accurately. At present, there is no consensus on many concepts of the Luo Xing problem at home and abroad, and without accurate conceptual support, there is no way to continue to discuss the Luo Xing problem, let alone how to solve it. Second, divide the time period of research scientifically. That is, to correct the time of tracing back to the history of Luo Xing, this paper holds that the time of discussing the history of Luo Xing should be from 1940s to 1940s, rather than from the mainstream views of 7 to 8 century or 15 century. Third, to supplement the research data in detail. To supplement the historical data from 1940s to 2008 in domestic articles, and to use the method of screening and textual research to quote more historical data. To make up for the military junta's relatively closed policy and Western media with biased reports caused by the lack of information. Fourth, innovative use of the perspective of research. From the angle of view which inclines to the Myanmar government and the Luo Xing people, this paper takes the historical theory and textual research method as the main methodology, at the same time carries on the analysis with the multi-disciplinary theory, studies the best not to follow the others. To strive for the history of the Luo Xing since the 1940s and the authenticity of the narrative.
【學位授予單位】：云南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K337.8
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 陳真波;;緬甸獨立運動中緬、孟兩族關系演變研究[J];東南亞研究;2013年01期
2 鐘貴峰;;論緬甸民族國家構建[J];紅河學院學報;2012年06期
3 王亞坤;;國際組織:世界動蕩的一個可能禍源——以聯(lián)合國難民署對羅興雅人變質的“自愿遣返”為例[J];理論界;2012年01期
4 王文奇;;民族主義與民族國家構建析論[J];史學集刊;2011年03期
5 閆偉杰;;當代西方民族主義研究范式述論[J];民族研究;2008年04期
6 錢雪梅;;宗教民族主義探析[J];民族研究;2007年04期
7 李晨陽;;獨立前緬甸民族主義精英對國家發(fā)展道路的探索[J];南洋問題研究;2006年04期
8 羅迪;毛玉西;;爭論中的“網(wǎng)絡民族主義”[J];中國青年研究;2006年05期
9 何躍;戰(zhàn)后緬甸脫離英聯(lián)邦原因探析[J];東南亞研究;2005年04期
10 胡滌非;民族主義的概念及起源[J];山西師大學報(社會科學版);2005年01期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 劉務;緬甸1988年以來的民族國家構建研究[D];云南大學;2013年
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 胡景朝;全球化背景下的民族主義問題研究[D];內蒙古大學;2013年
2 馬驥;試析緬甸羅興亞穆斯林民族問題的產(chǎn)生及其影響[D];外交學院;2010年
3 呂建文;冷戰(zhàn)后世界民族主義研究[D];山東師范大學;2008年
4 張學志;緬甸克倫族分離運動的興起與衰落[D];廈門大學;2008年
，本文編號：2177823
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2177823.html
最近更新
教材專著
