本文選題：獨(dú)島 + 獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)問(wèn)題的實(shí)質(zhì)是韓日間領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端問(wèn)題�，F(xiàn)今韓國(guó)警備隊(duì)實(shí)際支配著獨(dú)島,在日本國(guó)內(nèi)則有一大部分學(xué)者主張獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)應(yīng)歸屬于日本,日本的大多數(shù)國(guó)民也認(rèn)為日本的“竹島領(lǐng)有權(quán)”遲早會(huì)得到恢復(fù)。在韓國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)“獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)”問(wèn)題也同樣被受韓國(guó)國(guó)民所關(guān)注,對(duì)韓國(guó)人來(lái)說(shuō),獨(dú)島的主權(quán)問(wèn)題不單單是領(lǐng)土之爭(zhēng),其中包含著國(guó)防軍事戰(zhàn)略發(fā)展的需要,還包含著海洋權(quán)益的爭(zhēng)奪,更重要的是其背后貫穿著歷史詮釋權(quán)的斗爭(zhēng),以及朝鮮半島民族的歷史認(rèn)同和自身認(rèn)同的民族感情的體現(xiàn)。近年來(lái),“獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)問(wèn)題”不斷升溫,已經(jīng)成為影響韓日關(guān)系的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。 目前韓國(guó)學(xué)界的主流觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,韓日間關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)問(wèn)題的論爭(zhēng)始于1952年。1952年1月18日,韓國(guó)政府發(fā)表了《關(guān)于鄰接海洋主權(quán)的總統(tǒng)宣言》(通稱為“和平線宣布”或“李承晚領(lǐng)海線”),宣言中明確闡明了獨(dú)島是韓國(guó)固有領(lǐng)土,韓國(guó)對(duì)其擁有領(lǐng)有權(quán)。10天后,日本方面對(duì)此宣言表示抗議,同時(shí)否認(rèn)宣言中關(guān)于韓國(guó)政府擁有獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。韓日間關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的論爭(zhēng)由此開(kāi)始,并持續(xù)至今。 一方面,韓國(guó)學(xué)界關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)問(wèn)題研究成果屢見(jiàn)不鮮,以“獨(dú)島研究保全協(xié)會(huì)”為代表的各學(xué)術(shù)團(tuán)體舉行各類學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì),出版了大量關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的論文和著作。這些論文和著作大都從歷史學(xué)、地理學(xué)、國(guó)際法學(xué)等角度探討了“獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)”問(wèn)題。另一方面,日本學(xué)界關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的研究也從歷史學(xué)、國(guó)際法等諸多角度對(duì)其進(jìn)行了論述。本文的主要內(nèi)容共分為以下四個(gè)方面: 第一,獨(dú)島的自然狀況及擁有獨(dú)島主權(quán)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 第二,獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)爭(zhēng)端的由來(lái)及其演變過(guò)程。以“竹島一件”、《島根縣告示》、《舊金山對(duì)日和平條約》等歷史事件為主線,詳細(xì)論述獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)糾紛演變過(guò)程及其焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。 第三,韓國(guó)學(xué)界關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的主要觀點(diǎn)及其主要?dú)v史事實(shí)依據(jù)。雖然目前韓國(guó)學(xué)界關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的研究已經(jīng)取得了大量研究成果,并且有力地反駁了日本學(xué)者的反面主張,但很多細(xì)節(jié)還有待于進(jìn)一步深層次地探討,今后,韓國(guó)學(xué)者們?cè)诖藛?wèn)題的研究上仍然任重而道遠(yuǎn)。 第四,日本學(xué)界關(guān)于獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的主要觀點(diǎn)及其主要?dú)v史事實(shí)依據(jù)。日本學(xué)界的觀點(diǎn)并非全然主張日本擁有獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán),還有一少部分學(xué)者支持韓國(guó)學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)。 韓日雙方雖然各持己見(jiàn),但韓國(guó)方面的論據(jù)充足,更有說(shuō)服力。1996年《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》生效以后,兩國(guó)圍繞獨(dú)島領(lǐng)有權(quán)的糾紛實(shí)質(zhì)上包含著海洋權(quán)益的爭(zhēng)奪,因此,韓日兩國(guó)今后在獨(dú)島糾紛問(wèn)題上還將曠日持久地進(jìn)行,并且關(guān)于有爭(zhēng)議海域的摩擦可能增多。韓國(guó)政府及全體國(guó)民在獨(dú)島維權(quán)過(guò)程中有很多地方值得我們學(xué)習(xí)。
[Abstract]:The essence of Dokdo's sovereignty is the dispute between Korea and Japan. At present, the South Korean Police Force actually dominates Dokdo, while in Japan, a large proportion of scholars advocate that the right of Dokdo collar should belong to Japan, and most of the Japanese people also think that Japan's "Takesima right" will be restored sooner or later. In South Korea, the issue of "Dokdo sovereignty" has also been concerned by Korean nationals. To Koreans, the sovereignty issue of Dokdo is not only a territorial dispute, but also contains the need for the development of national defense and military strategy. It also includes the struggle for the rights and interests of the sea, the struggle for the right of historical interpretation behind it, and the reflection of the historical identity and the national feelings of the Korean Peninsula. In recent years, the issue of Dokdo's power has become the focus of Korean-Japanese relations. At present, the mainstream view of Korean academic circles is that the dispute between Korea and Japan on the right to claim Dokdo began in 1952. On January 18, 1952, The Korean Government issued the Presidential Declaration on the sovereignty of adjacent Seas (commonly referred to as the "declaration of the line of peace" or the "line of Li Seung-Man territorial waters"), in which it was made clear that Dokdo was an inherent territory of the Republic of Korea over which it was entitled for .10 days, Japan protested the declaration and denied any claims that the South Korean government has the right to Dokdo. South Korea and Japan on the sovereignty of Dokdo began to debate, and continue to this day. On the one hand, the Korean academic circles on the right of Dokdo territorial rights research results are common, "Dokdo Research and Conservation Association" as a representative of the various academic groups held various academic seminars, published a large number of papers and works on Dokdo right. Most of these papers and works discuss Dudao's right of law from the perspectives of history, geography and international law. On the other hand, the Japanese academic research on the right of Dokdo also discusses it from many angles, such as history, international law and so on. The main contents of this paper are divided into the following four aspects: first, the natural situation of Dudao and the practical significance of having Dudao sovereignty. Second, the origin and evolution of Dudao sovereignty dispute. Taking the historical events such as "one piece of Bamboo Island", "Islander County notice" and "Peace Treaty between San Francisco and Japan" as the main line, this paper discusses in detail the evolution process of Dudao's sovereignty dispute and its focal point. Third, the Korean academic circles about the Dokdo right of the main views and the main historical facts. Although the Korean academic circles have made a great deal of research achievements on the right of Dokdo, and have refuted the negative claim of Japanese scholars, but many details still need to be further discussed, and in the future, Korean scholars still have a long way to go to study this issue. Fourth, the Japanese academic circles about the Dokdo territorial right of the main views and the main historical facts. Japanese scholars do not entirely advocate that Japan has the right to Dokdo, and a small number of scholars support the view of Korean scholars. Although the ROK and Japan hold their own views, the South Korean side has ample arguments and is more persuasive. After the entry into force of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1996, the dispute between the two countries over the sovereignty of Dokdo essentially involves a struggle for maritime rights and interests. South Korea and Japan will continue to work on the Dokdo dispute for a long time in the future, and friction over disputed waters is likely to increase. South Korean government and all citizens in the process of Dokdo rights there are many places to learn.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：K3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳政;日本民族主義與獨(dú)島爭(zhēng)端（1618-2008）[D];江西師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2065172