本文選題：朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭 + 蘇聯(lián)�。� 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：二戰(zhàn)后，由于意識形態(tài)的差異和國家利益的博弈，戰(zhàn)勝法西斯后的世界分別形成了以蘇聯(lián)為首的社會主義陣營和以美國為首的資本主義陣營兩大集團(tuán)。在大國的干涉下，趕走了日本法西斯的朝鮮半島出現(xiàn)了分裂的局面，原本統(tǒng)一的國家分裂為以蘇聯(lián)為后盾的朝鮮民主主義人民共和國和美國支持的大韓民國。中華人民共和國建國后采取了“一邊倒”的政策，即與蘇聯(lián)結(jié)盟的政策，為了鞏固中蘇同盟，1950年1月10日，，蘇聯(lián)暫時(shí)離開安理會，以支持中國在聯(lián)合國獲得合法席位。然而，就在蘇聯(lián)暫時(shí)離開安理會的169天里，美國操縱聯(lián)合國通過了武裝干涉朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭的決議。美國的參戰(zhàn)出乎斯大林的意料之外，二戰(zhàn)后，美蘇兩國出于國家利益的考慮，都盡量避免雙方在戰(zhàn)場上正面沖突，于是在朝鮮戰(zhàn)場上，一方打著聯(lián)合國軍的旗號支持大韓民國李承晚政權(quán)，而另一方則以隱形的方式背后支持朝鮮民主主義人民共和國金日成政權(quán)，盡管雙方對此心照不宣，但卻彼此沉默了40年。中國出于國家安全的考慮和來自蘇聯(lián)的壓力，以及國際主義的原則，不得不出兵抗美援朝保家衛(wèi)國，同鼓吹國家安全至上，急于充當(dāng)“世界警察”的美國直面對抗，經(jīng)過兩年零九個(gè)月的戰(zhàn)爭，最終迫使美國簽署停戰(zhàn)協(xié)定，雙方以三八線為界停戰(zhàn)。朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭是冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期兩大集團(tuán)在遠(yuǎn)東地區(qū)進(jìn)行的第一次角逐，直接交戰(zhàn)國中國與美國都付出了巨大的犧牲，而蘇聯(lián)卻以極小的代價(jià)贏得了與美國初次對決中的勝利，提高了自己在社會主義陣營乃至在國際上的威望，成為朝鮮戰(zhàn)場上的贏家。
[Abstract]:After World War II, because of the difference of ideology and the game of national interests, the world after the defeat of fascism formed two groups: the socialist camp headed by the Soviet Union and the capitalist camp led by the United States. With the intervention of the great powers, the Korean peninsula, which had been driven away from Japan, was divided into the Democratic people's Republic of Korea, backed by the Soviet Union, and the Republic of Korea, supported by the United States. The people's Republic of China adopted the policy of "one-sided" after the founding of the people's Republic of China, that is, the policy of alliance with the Soviet Union. In order to consolidate the Sino-Soviet alliance, the Soviet Union temporarily left the Security Council on January 10, 1950 to support China's obtaining a legal seat in the United Nations. However, within 169 days of the Soviet Union's temporary departure from the Security Council, the United States manipulated the United Nations to pass a resolution on armed intervention in the Korean War. The participation of the United States in the war was unexpected to Stalin. After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union, out of consideration of national interests, tried to avoid direct confrontation between the two sides on the battlefield, so in the Korean battlefield, One side backed the Republic of Korea's Li Seung-Man regime in the name of a United Nations military, while the other backed the Democratic people's Republic of Korea's Kim Il Sung regime in an invisible way. Despite their tacit understanding, the two sides remained silent for 40 years. Out of considerations of national security, pressure from the Soviet Union and the principles of internationalism, China had to send troops, resist US aggression and aid Korea to defend its country and confront the United States, which preaches the supremacy of national security and is eager to act as the "world police". After two years and nine months of war, the United States was finally forced to sign an armistice agreement, and the two sides took the 38th line as the boundary truce. The Korean War was the first contest between the two major blocs in the far East during the Cold War. China and the United States both made great sacrifices in direct confrontation with each other, while the Soviet Union won the first confrontation with the United States at a very small cost. He raised his prestige in the socialist camp and internationally, and became the winner on the Korean battlefield.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K153

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 顏聲毅;朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭:俄羅斯公布秘密檔案[J];國際展望;2000年19期

2 沈志華;;1949年中蘇反對軍事進(jìn)攻南朝鮮[J];文史博覽;2010年06期

3 王亞志;沈志華;李丹慧;;美國為何掩蓋蘇聯(lián)空軍入朝作戰(zhàn)[J];文史博覽;2010年06期

4 齊德學(xué);;關(guān)于抗美援朝出兵決策的幾個(gè)問題[J];軍事歷史;1993年02期

5 孟照輝;朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭是怎樣打起來的?——對朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭起因、性質(zhì)、責(zé)任的探討[J];軍事歷史;2000年06期

6 沈志華;;斯大林、毛澤東與朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭再議——根據(jù)俄國檔案文獻(xiàn)的最新證據(jù)[J];史學(xué)集刊;2007年05期

7 宋曉芹;;朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)后蘇聯(lián)缺席安理會討論的再思考——從斯大林給哥特瓦爾德的一份電報(bào)說開去[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

8 沈志華;朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭研究綜述:新材料和新看法[J];中共黨史研究;1996年06期

本文編號：2057489