本文選題：洛克菲勒基金會(huì) + 黑非洲�。� 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：洛克菲勒基金會(huì)作為獨(dú)立于政府和企業(yè)之外的民間組織,自成立以來(lái),其本著“為全人類(lèi)謀福利”的宗旨,為世界一些地區(qū)的發(fā)展做了不少工作。自20世紀(jì)50年代早期開(kāi)始,洛克菲勒基金會(huì)通過(guò)撥款和派遣科研專(zhuān)家等形式,為黑非洲的農(nóng)作物品種改良、畜禽疾病防治和農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)人才培養(yǎng)付出了很大努力,也取得了一定成效,推動(dòng)了黑非洲現(xiàn)代化的起步。但由于黑非洲地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)極為薄弱、當(dāng)?shù)卣疀Q策失誤與重視不夠,再加上基金會(huì)本身活動(dòng)的局限性等因素的存在,洛克菲勒基金會(huì)的黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)項(xiàng)目可能不如它的墨西哥計(jì)劃和印度計(jì)劃那樣效果明顯。 本文擬從洛克菲勒基金會(huì)作為在當(dāng)今世界影響日益深遠(yuǎn)的國(guó)際非政府組織的視角入手,首先概述基金會(huì)的發(fā)跡史及其海外活動(dòng)情況,再以1952-1972年期間基金會(huì)在肯尼亞、坦桑尼亞、烏干達(dá)和尼日利亞等黑非洲主要國(guó)家開(kāi)展的農(nóng)業(yè)項(xiàng)目為對(duì)象,進(jìn)行深入、細(xì)致的剖析,力求對(duì)其合作項(xiàng)目作出客觀(guān)評(píng)價(jià),同時(shí)試圖闡述黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)的發(fā)展困境與基金會(huì)活動(dòng)的有效性之間的關(guān)系以及美國(guó)對(duì)非政策與基金會(huì)農(nóng)業(yè)合作項(xiàng)目的關(guān)系。筆者不揣淺陋,對(duì)該問(wèn)題加以粗略梳理與探析,還望學(xué)界明達(dá)多多指教。 論文正文分四章,第一章介紹了洛克菲勒家族的崛起、洛克菲勒基金會(huì)的創(chuàng)建,簡(jiǎn)要概述了洛克菲勒基金會(huì)在亞非拉等欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)的活動(dòng)經(jīng)歷,并分析了其海外農(nóng)業(yè)項(xiàng)目的成就及不足。它為解決亞非拉地區(qū)的糧食短缺問(wèn)題做出了一定貢獻(xiàn),但實(shí)際活動(dòng)中仍受制于復(fù)雜而且經(jīng)常是不可預(yù)知的社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治因素。 第二章詳細(xì)梳理了洛克菲勒基金會(huì)在黑非洲的農(nóng)業(yè)合作活動(dòng)�；饡�(huì)不僅直接資助黑非洲地區(qū)的農(nóng)作物品種改良和畜禽疾病防治工作,而且還援助國(guó)際農(nóng)業(yè)研究院建設(shè)、重視非洲當(dāng)?shù)剞r(nóng)業(yè)人才培養(yǎng)及農(nóng)業(yè)高等教育發(fā)展。 第三章是對(duì)洛克菲勒基金會(huì)扶持肯尼亞農(nóng)業(yè)與教育發(fā)展進(jìn)行的個(gè)案研究�；饡�(huì)既為斯里巴農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)院和埃格頓農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)院提供了大批資助,又派出數(shù)位專(zhuān)家與肯尼亞本土人員合作開(kāi)展小麥研究。 第四章是本文的結(jié)論部分,不僅客觀(guān)總結(jié)了洛克菲勒基金會(huì)的黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)項(xiàng)目的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足,并且指出了當(dāng)今黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展的困境制約了基金會(huì)的活動(dòng)進(jìn)程�；饡�(huì)的農(nóng)業(yè)援助活動(dòng)具有很大的開(kāi)創(chuàng)性和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,既有利于新觀(guān)念的普及,也推動(dòng)了黑非洲本土農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)人才的培養(yǎng)。但由于黑非洲地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)極為薄弱、當(dāng)?shù)卣疀Q策失誤與重視不夠,再加上基金會(huì)本身活動(dòng)的局限性等因素的存在,所以其黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)活動(dòng)效果并不是特別明顯,而且其某些行為也具有自私傾向,屢遭詬病。 余論部分簡(jiǎn)要分析了洛克菲勒基金會(huì)的黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)項(xiàng)目與戰(zhàn)后美國(guó)對(duì)非政策之間的關(guān)系�？梢哉f(shuō),洛克菲勒基金會(huì)的黑非洲農(nóng)業(yè)援助項(xiàng)目在大方向上與美國(guó)對(duì)非政策是一致的,但又不乏矛盾和距離。
[Abstract]:Since its establishment, the Rockefeller foundation, a civil organization independent of government and enterprises, has done a lot of work for the development of some regions in the world since its establishment. Since the early 1950s, the Rockefeller foundation has allocated funds and scientific research experts to serve as a farmer in black Africa. The improvement of crop varieties, the prevention and control of livestock and poultry diseases and the cultivation of agricultural technical personnel have made great efforts and achieved some achievements, which have promoted the start of the modernization of black Africa. However, because of the weak economic base of the black African region, the lack of local government decision making and the lack of attention, and the limitations of the foundation's own activities, The Rockefeller Foundation's Black Africa agriculture project may not be as effective as its Mexico plan and India plan.
From the perspective of the Rockefeller foundation, which is an increasingly far-reaching international non-governmental organization in the world today, this paper first outlines the history of the foundation and its overseas activities, and then the agricultural projects in major black African countries such as Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Nigeria during the 1952-1972 years. In order to make a thorough and detailed analysis, we try to make an objective evaluation of its cooperative project, and try to explain the relationship between the development dilemma of agriculture in black Africa and the effectiveness of the foundation of the foundation, as well as the relationship between the non policy and the foundation for agricultural cooperation in the United States. It is also expected that the academic world is more enlighten.
The text of the thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the rise of the Rockefeller family and the creation of the Rockefeller foundation, briefly outlines the activities of the Rockefeller foundation in the underdeveloped areas such as Asia and Africa, and analyses the achievements and shortcomings of its overseas agricultural projects. It has made some contributions to solve the problem of food shortage in the region of Asia and Africa. But actual activities are still constrained by complex and often unpredictable social, economic and political factors.
The second chapter deals with the agricultural cooperation activities of the Rockefeller foundation in black Africa in detail. The foundation not only directly subsidized the improvement of crop varieties in black Africa and the prevention and control of livestock and poultry disease, but also assisted the construction of the International Agricultural Research Institute, and attached great importance to the development of agricultural talents cultivation in Africa and the development of agricultural higher education.
The third chapter is a case study of the Rockefeller Foundation's support for the development of agriculture and education in Kenya. The foundation has provided a large amount of funding for the Academy of agriculture and the Agron Institute of agriculture, and also sent several experts to cooperate with local people in Kenya to carry out the research on wheat.
The fourth chapter is the conclusion of this article, which not only objectively summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the Rockefeller Foundation's black African agricultural project, but also points out that the dilemma of agricultural development in black Africa restricts the activities of the foundation. The fund's agricultural aid activities are very pioneering and risky, which are beneficial to the new concept. It has also promoted the cultivation of local agricultural technicians in black Africa, but because of the weak economic base of the black African region, the lack of local government decision making and the lack of attention, and the limitations of the foundation's own activities, the effect of the agricultural activities in black Africa is not particularly obvious, and some of its actions are also Selfish tendencies are repeatedly criticized.
The remaining part briefly analyzes the relationship between the Rockefeller Foundation's black African agricultural project and the post-war American policy. It can be said that the Rockefeller Foundation's black African agricultural aid project is in the same direction as the US policy in the big direction, but there is no lack of contradiction and departure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K153;F34

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 資中筠;;一種值得推崇的散財(cái)之道[J];博覽群書(shū);2003年04期

2 巨永明;馮曉娟;;國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界關(guān)于美國(guó)基金會(huì)研究述評(píng)[J];滄桑;2007年04期

3 李娟;;美國(guó)慈善基金會(huì)與美國(guó)外交[J];工會(huì)論壇(山東省工會(huì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年06期

4 岳毓常;;披著慈善外衣為壟斷屒本服務(wù)的美國(guó)“基金會(huì)”[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;1964年05期

5 覃民;福特基金[J];中國(guó)計(jì)劃生育學(xué)雜志;2001年04期

6 李佩珊;20世紀(jì)前半葉科學(xué)技術(shù)從美國(guó)向中國(guó)的傳入及其影響[J];美國(guó)研究;1991年04期

7 徐彤武;;美國(guó)國(guó)際性民間組織研究[J];美國(guó)研究;2010年04期

8 ;洛克菲勒基金會(huì)與中國(guó)[J];美國(guó)研究;1996年01期

9 包錫南;;非洲的饑荒和農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境保護(hù)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境與發(fā)展;1988年03期

10 王名;NGO及其在扶貧開(kāi)發(fā)中的作用[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李韜;美國(guó)的慈善基金會(huì)與美國(guó)政治[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2055873