本文選題：第四次十字軍東征 + 偶然事件　； 參考：《江西社會科學(xué)》2012年06期

【摘要】：現(xiàn)存原始資料并不能證明第四次十字軍東征的轉(zhuǎn)向是偶然事件的結(jié)果。相關(guān)原始資料中,只有維爾阿杜安的《君士坦丁堡征服記》主張"偶然事件論",其余的或者主張陰謀論,或者反映了陰謀的存在,或者譴責(zé)威尼斯人。但維爾阿杜安的記載并不可靠,他寫作的時候西方正在質(zhì)疑第四次十字軍東征的合法性,為了替自己和十字軍首領(lǐng)們辯護,他寫了回憶錄,設(shè)法隱藏事實真相,把第四次十字軍東征的轉(zhuǎn)向解釋成一系列偶然事件的結(jié)果�？諣柕痊F(xiàn)代學(xué)者依據(jù)維爾阿杜安的記載,辯護"偶然事件論",他們的觀點也沒有說服力。
[Abstract]:Existing sources do not prove that the fourth Crusade turn was the result of accidental events. Of the relevant sources, only Viladouan's Conquer of Constantinople advocates the "theory of accident", and the rest either advocates conspiracy theory, reflects the existence of a conspiracy, or condemns the Venetians. But Viadouan's account was unreliable, and he was writing at a time when the West was questioning the legitimacy of the fourth Crusade, and in order to defend himself and the leaders of the Crusades, he wrote his memoirs, trying to hide the truth. The turn of the fourth Crusade was interpreted as the result of a series of accidental events. Modern scholars, such as Quille, defended the "theory of accidental events" on the basis of Viadouan's records, and their arguments were not convincing.
【作者單位】： 中南大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K503
，

本文編號：1996959