本文選題：薩摩斯 + 僭主政治�。� 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：古風(fēng)時(shí)代,僭主政治是一種普遍且重要的政治體制。公元前7至前6世紀(jì),僭主政治在希臘半島、小亞細(xì)亞以及愛琴海諸島嶼的若干城邦中均曾出現(xiàn)過。公元前7世紀(jì)末,薩摩斯僭主政治建立,持續(xù)到公元前5世紀(jì)初結(jié)束,前后超過110年,這段時(shí)期也被稱為薩摩斯的僭政時(shí)期。正是在這段時(shí)期里,薩摩斯經(jīng)濟(jì)、城邦建設(shè)、文化發(fā)展以及對(duì)外關(guān)系等方面迅速發(fā)展。僭政時(shí)期,薩摩斯經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展體現(xiàn)在農(nóng)業(yè)、手工業(yè)、造船業(yè)等方面,生產(chǎn)技術(shù)進(jìn)步,制作工藝水平提升,尤其是三槳座船的建造使薩摩斯海軍實(shí)力大為提升,取得了令人矚目的海上地位。伴隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,民眾對(duì)城邦建設(shè)以及精神文化提出了更高的要求。城邦基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施不僅應(yīng)滿足基本的生活所需,還需具備防御外敵、豐富精神生活的功能。于是僭政時(shí)期薩摩斯大力推動(dòng)城邦建設(shè),完善基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,改善居住環(huán)境,其聞名于世的三大建筑引水渠、防波海堤以及赫拉神廟即建造于這一時(shí)期。在滿足精神需求方面,薩摩斯亦取得了非凡的文化成就,雕刻、繪畫技藝成熟,建筑裝飾優(yōu)雅美觀,詩(shī)歌題材豐富,哲學(xué)思考更加深入。僭政時(shí)期,薩摩斯的對(duì)外關(guān)系也發(fā)生變化:對(duì)外貿(mào)易擴(kuò)展,殖民活動(dòng)增加,海盜活動(dòng)頻仍,外交政策靈活多變,僭主以利益為導(dǎo)向,與埃及由聯(lián)盟走向分裂,與波斯從對(duì)抗轉(zhuǎn)向臣服。總之,僭政時(shí)期是薩摩斯發(fā)展的黃金期,經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮,實(shí)力強(qiáng)大,不僅聞名于當(dāng)時(shí),在古希臘發(fā)展史上亦有著重要影響。考察僭政時(shí)期薩摩斯的發(fā)展情況,不僅有助于了解薩摩斯在古希臘世界歷史地位,對(duì)揭示僭政與城邦發(fā)展之間的關(guān)系也有借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In ancient times, tyrant politics was a universal and important political system. From the 7th to the 6th century BC, tyrants were present in the Greek peninsula, Asia minor, and the Aegean islands. At the end of the 7th century BC, Samos was established as a tyrant until the end of the fifth century BC, more than 110 years before and after, also known as the period of arroganism of Samos. It was during this period that Samos developed rapidly in economy, city-state construction, cultural development and foreign relations. During the period of blasphemy, the economic development of Samos was reflected in the development of agriculture, handicraft, shipbuilding, and so on. The progress of production technology and the improvement of manufacturing technology, especially the construction of three oars, greatly enhanced the strength of the Samos navy. A remarkable maritime position has been achieved. With the development of economy, people put forward higher requirements to the construction of city-state and spiritual culture. The city-state infrastructure should not only meet the basic needs of life, but also have the function of defending foreign enemies and enriching spiritual life. Thus Samos vigorously promoted the construction of city-states, improved infrastructure and improved living environment during the period of blasphemy. His three famous construction channels, seawalls and the temple of Hera were built in this period. In meeting the spiritual needs Samos has also made remarkable cultural achievements carving painting mature architectural decoration elegant and beautiful poetry rich themes philosophical thinking more in-depth. During the period of blasphemy, the foreign relations of Samos also changed: the expansion of foreign trade, the increase of colonial activities, the frequent activities of pirates, the flexible and changeable foreign policy, the interest orientation of the tyrants, and the division of Samos from the alliance with Egypt. From confrontation to subjugation with Persia. In short, the period of blasphemy was the golden period of Samos' development. The economy was prosperous and powerful, which was not only famous at that time, but also had an important influence in the history of ancient Greece. The investigation of the development of Samos during the period of blasphemy is not only helpful to understand the historical position of Samos in ancient Greece, but also to reveal the relationship between the blasphemy and the development of city-state.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李家燦;;論色諾芬眼中的古希臘仁慈僭主[J];貴陽(yáng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

2 殷超峰;;古希臘僭主政治評(píng)析[J];西安社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

3 呂培;;對(duì)古風(fēng)時(shí)期雅典僭主政治的反傳統(tǒng)思考[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年16期

4 閔良臣;;把國(guó)王“弄成可以懲罰的”——讀《希臘的僭主政治》[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇(學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)論卷);2008年04期

5 李濤;;希臘僭主政治淺析[J];陰山學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

6 蘇振興;古希臘早期僭主政治探析[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

7 張晶;希臘早期僭主政治的歷史作用[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

8 楊巨平,張麗霞;試論米利都的文化中心地位及其成因[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

9 胡景平，靳艷;論僭主政治與大夫?qū)Ｕ㘚J];西北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版.漢文);1994年03期

10 余麗珍;試論希臘早期僭政產(chǎn)生的歷史背景[J];世界歷史;1992年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙永建;希臘思想家論僭主政治[D];天津師范大學(xué);2015年

2 趙曼曼;“小亞希臘”與波斯和希臘本土間的政治關(guān)系研究（公元前560年—前494年）[D];南京師范大學(xué);2014年

3 李海強(qiáng);貢斯當(dāng)論僭主政治[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

4 任冬梅;淺析古希臘早期僭主政治[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1976660