本文選題：第二次世界大戰(zhàn) + 列強(qiáng)��； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 敘利亞和黎巴嫩地處歐亞非三大洲的要沖,自古以來就是有關(guān)強(qiáng)國(guó)的必爭(zhēng)之地。第二次世界大戰(zhàn)在歐洲全面爆發(fā)后,中東地區(qū)直接遭受戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)軍事行動(dòng)影響的僅有馬格里布,但是列強(qiáng)在中東地區(qū)政治外交舞臺(tái)上的角逐卻愈演愈烈,對(duì)敘利亞和黎巴嫩的爭(zhēng)奪就是其中之一。 當(dāng)代敘利亞和黎巴嫩兩國(guó)所在地,第一次世界大戰(zhàn)期間被英、法占領(lǐng),大戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,經(jīng)協(xié)約國(guó)最高理事會(huì)決定交由法國(guó)實(shí)施委任統(tǒng)治。1940年6月,法國(guó)被德國(guó)擊敗,敘利亞和黎巴嫩戰(zhàn)略地位的重要性陡增,德、意、英、法(維希政府與“自由法國(guó)”)等國(guó)爭(zhēng)相加緊了對(duì)該地區(qū)的控制與搶奪。這其中既包括法西斯國(guó)家與反法西斯盟國(guó)之間的爭(zhēng)奪,也包括反法西斯盟國(guó)內(nèi)部的沖突與摩擦。 列強(qiáng)的爭(zhēng)奪雖然在形式上各有不同,但都是為了實(shí)現(xiàn)爭(zhēng)霸利益最大化而采取的手段。在列強(qiáng)爭(zhēng)奪的夾縫中,敘黎人民抓住了擺脫殖民統(tǒng)治的機(jī)遇,實(shí)現(xiàn)了國(guó)家獨(dú)立的愿望。 本文以二戰(zhàn)期間有關(guān)大國(guó)對(duì)敘利亞和黎巴嫩的爭(zhēng)奪為個(gè)案,進(jìn)行一次比較細(xì)致、全面的學(xué)術(shù)梳理,以期補(bǔ)充和深化對(duì)中東地區(qū)受二戰(zhàn)影響的有關(guān)問題的理解。 本文包括引言、正文、結(jié)論、參考文獻(xiàn)四部分。 引言部分:闡明本選題的背景、意義、研究目的、研究方法以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究動(dòng)態(tài)。 正文部分共分為四章,具體內(nèi)容分述如下: 第一章:概述了一戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后法國(guó)對(duì)敘利亞和黎巴嫩委任統(tǒng)治權(quán)的確立,及至二戰(zhàn)全面爆發(fā)前,隨著歐洲局勢(shì)的變化,法國(guó)對(duì)敘黎統(tǒng)治政策所作的調(diào)整。 第二章:梳理了1940年夏法國(guó)淪陷后,德、意、英、法(維希政府與“自由法國(guó)”)圍繞敘利亞和黎巴嫩的主權(quán)歸屬以及軍事利用等問題所進(jìn)行的爭(zhēng)斗。 第三章:運(yùn)用對(duì)比的方法,深刻剖析了德、意、英、法爭(zhēng)奪敘黎政策手段的異同,以及他們各自政策的利益所在。 第四章:論述了列強(qiáng)的爭(zhēng)奪對(duì)敘黎的客觀影響,即加速了法國(guó)委任統(tǒng)治的終結(jié),促進(jìn)了敘黎民族主義力量的壯大,為包括敘黎在內(nèi)的中東國(guó)家擺脫殖民統(tǒng)治提供了機(jī)遇。 結(jié)論部分:簡(jiǎn)要總結(jié)了二戰(zhàn)期間,列強(qiáng)對(duì)敘黎爭(zhēng)奪的原因、特點(diǎn)、實(shí)質(zhì)、以及對(duì)戰(zhàn)后敘黎發(fā)展的影響。
[Abstract]:Syria and Lebanon, located on three continents, Eurasia and Africa, have been competing for power since ancient times. After the outbreak of the second World War in Europe, only the Maghreb was directly affected by the war and military actions in the Middle East region, but the rivalry of the powers in the political and diplomatic arena of the Middle East region became increasingly fierce. The battle over Syria and Lebanon is one of them. The seat of contemporary Syria and Lebanon, occupied by Britain and France during the first World War. After the war was over, the Supreme Council of the Confederate Nations decided to hand over its mandate to France, which was defeated by Germany in June 1940. The strategic position of Syria and Lebanon has grown in importance, with Germany, Italy, Britain, France (the Vichy government and "Free France") scrambling to control and seize the region. This includes not only the scramble between fascist countries and anti-fascist allies, but also the conflicts and frictions within anti-fascist allies. Although the forms of the scramble for the powers are different, they are all the means to maximize the interests of hegemony. In the gap between the great powers, the Syrian-Lebanese people seized the opportunity to get rid of colonial rule and realized their national independence. This paper takes the competition between Syria and Lebanon during World War II as an example and makes a detailed and comprehensive academic review in order to supplement and deepen the understanding of the problems affected by World War II in the Middle East. This article includes the introduction, the body, the conclusion, the reference four parts. Introduction: explain the background, significance, research purpose, research methods and domestic and foreign research trends. The text is divided into four chapters, the specific content is as follows: The first chapter summarizes the establishment of the appointed rule over Syria and Lebanon after the first World War, and the adjustment of the rule policy of France to Syria and Lebanon with the change of the situation in Europe before the outbreak of World War II. Chapter two: after the fall of France in the summer of 1940, Germany, Italy, England, France (Vichy Government and Free France) fought over the sovereignty and military use of Syria and Lebanon. Chapter three: using the method of contrast, the paper analyzes the similarities and differences between Germany, Italy, Britain and France in the policy of Syria and Lebanon, and the interests of their respective policies. Chapter four discusses the objective influence of the scramble of the powers on Syria and Lebanon, that is, accelerating the end of the appointed rule of France, promoting the strength of the nationalistic forces of Syria and Lebanon, and providing an opportunity for the Middle Eastern countries, including Syria and Lebanon, to get rid of colonial rule. Conclusion: the paper briefly summarizes the causes, characteristics, essence and influence on the development of Syria and Lebanon during World War II.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：K152

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張忠其;;試析維希法國(guó)的“新秩序”[J];杭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1991年02期

2 黃民興;第二次世界大戰(zhàn)與中東民族主義的發(fā)展[J];西安教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王新剛;現(xiàn)代敘利亞研究[D];西北大學(xué);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 程俊;敘黎特殊關(guān)系的影響因素探究[D];西北大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1939020