本文選題：張鼓峰事件 + 蘇日關(guān)系　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：“九·一八事變”后,日本侵占中國東北地區(qū),并一手拼湊了偽滿傀儡政權(quán)。張鼓峰事件是發(fā)生在偽滿洲國與蘇聯(lián)毗鄰邊境地帶的軍事沖突事件,日本雖然打著偽滿的幌子,但其沖突的主體是蘇日兩方。張鼓峰事件的爆發(fā)是東北亞國際關(guān)系復(fù)雜化的產(chǎn)物,也是蘇日關(guān)系進(jìn)一步惡化的結(jié)果。將張鼓峰事件置于20世紀(jì)30年代東北亞國際關(guān)系的背景之下就不難看出,在此事件之前蘇日雙方在“滿”蘇、“滿”蒙邊境地帶的對(duì)峙已經(jīng)勢(shì)同水火難以調(diào)和。蘇聯(lián)方面和日“滿”方面都在極力加強(qiáng)邊境地區(qū)軍事部署。張鼓峰事件的出現(xiàn)有很多偶發(fā)因素使然,但事有必至理有固然,這場(chǎng)沖突更是蘇日利益碰撞的必然結(jié)果。以1938年8月6日為分界,該事件的階段性特點(diǎn)以及戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)主動(dòng)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)換等有明顯不同。同時(shí),蘇聯(lián)投入三倍于日軍之兵力加之多兵種聯(lián)合作戰(zhàn)為蘇軍扭轉(zhuǎn)戰(zhàn)局、掌握作戰(zhàn)主動(dòng)權(quán)提供了有力保障,日軍損失慘重請(qǐng)求停戰(zhàn)。蘇聯(lián)在張鼓峰事件中雖然最終取得戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)主動(dòng)權(quán),但是實(shí)際兵力損失遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于日方,這也反映出蘇聯(lián)軍隊(duì)尚存諸多不足。張鼓峰事件對(duì)蘇聯(lián)、日本及中國都產(chǎn)生了較大影響,日本“北進(jìn)戰(zhàn)略”受挫,蘇聯(lián)遠(yuǎn)東地區(qū)的安全得以保障,西方國家對(duì)張鼓峰事件的態(tài)度也反映了其不同的政治選擇與考量。張鼓峰事件使得東北亞的“棋局”博弈更加緊張復(fù)雜,并加速了東北亞國際關(guān)系的重構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:After the September 18 th incident, Japan invaded northeast China and patched together puppet regimes. Zhang Gufeng incident occurred in the military conflict between the puppet Manchukuo and the Soviet Union adjacent to the border. Although Japan was under the guise of false Manchuria, the main body of the conflict was the Soviet Union and Japan. The outbreak of Zhang Gufeng is the product of the complication of international relations in Northeast Asia and the result of further deterioration of Soviet-Japanese relations. Under the background of the international relations in Northeast Asia in the 1930s, it is not difficult to see that before this incident, the confrontation between the Soviet and Japanese sides in the "Manchu" and "Manchurian" border areas has become difficult to reconcile with water and fire. Both the Soviet side and the Japanese "Manchu" side are working hard to strengthen military deployment in the border areas. The emergence of Zhang Gufeng incident is caused by a lot of accidental factors, but of course, this conflict is the inevitable result of the collision of interests between the Soviet Union and Japan. Taking Aug. 6, 1938 as the dividing line, the stage characteristics of the event and the change of active power in the battlefield are obviously different. At the same time, the Soviet Union invested three times as many troops as the Japanese army, combined with a multi-unit joint operation, which provided the Soviet forces with a strong guarantee to reverse the war situation and seize the operational initiative, and the Japanese army made heavy losses and asked for a truce. Although the Soviet Union finally gained the battlefield initiative in the Zhang Gufeng incident, the actual loss of troops was far higher than that of the Japanese side, which also reflected that the Soviet army still had many shortcomings. The Zhanggu Feng incident had a great influence on the Soviet Union, Japan and China. The "northward advance strategy" of Japan was frustrated, the security of the far East of the Soviet Union was guaranteed, and the attitude of the western countries to Zhang Gufeng also reflected their different political choices and considerations. Zhang Gufeng made the chess game in Northeast Asia more tense and complicated, and accelerated the reconstruction of international relations in Northeast Asia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：K151

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曲曉范;智利疆;;1938年日蘇張鼓峰事件新論[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

2 李凡;三十年代日本侵華與中日蘇三國關(guān)系變化[J];南開學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

3 王春良;簡論1935-1945年日本與蘇聯(lián)的關(guān)系[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 王春良;論日、蘇張鼓峰事件和諾門坎事件[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

5 趙玉潔;日軍兵敗張鼓峰[J];文史精華;2000年07期

6 羅志剛;略論抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期蘇聯(lián)參加對(duì)日作戰(zhàn)問題[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

7 羅志剛;1937—1945年蘇聯(lián)遠(yuǎn)東政策的演變[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年01期

8 羅志剛;1931—1937年的蘇聯(lián)遠(yuǎn)東政策與外交[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年04期

9 高培;對(duì)張鼓峰和諾門坎事件的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];軍事歷史;1994年02期

10 張捷;;張鼓峰事件是日本北進(jìn)的試探嗎?——兼論日本北進(jìn)戰(zhàn)略的畸變[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1930619