本文選題：李廷龜 + 中朝關(guān)系�。� 參考：《陜西師范大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本篇論文主要論述朝鮮大臣李廷龜庚申(1620年)使明事件,屬于中朝關(guān)系史和前清史的范疇。核心人物是朝鮮重臣李廷龜。李廷龜在朝鮮歷仕宣祖、光海君、仁祖三朝,由進士累遷至右議政,在朝鮮歷史上是一個重要人物。其實在中朝關(guān)系史上,李廷龜也是一位重要人物,因為他一生四次出使明朝,首次辯丁應(yīng)泰之誣,末次辯朝鮮私通后金事件,這都是對于中朝關(guān)系有重大影響的重要事件。論文圍繞的核心事件是李廷龜庚申年出使明朝事件,詳論出使的前因后果,以及此事件背后折射出的中朝關(guān)系的相關(guān)問題。 本篇論文共分七章。第一章是緒論,介紹了中朝關(guān)系史的相關(guān)研究情況。前輩學者對中朝關(guān)系史論述甚多,研究已相當深入,但是主要是圍繞在后金壯大前后以及薩爾滸之戰(zhàn)前后朝鮮與后金、明關(guān)系的變化上。對李廷龜庚申使明事件少有人關(guān)注,因此圍繞具體人物的具體外交事件就有了研究的必要。 第二章論述李廷龜?shù)纳胶退那叭问姑魇录：喴榻B了李廷龜?shù)南嚓P(guān)情況以及他的仕宦經(jīng)歷,重點論述了他的前三次使明經(jīng)歷：戊戌(1598年)辯誣之行；甲辰(1604年)奏請冊封世子之行；丙辰(1616年)奏請冠服之行。 第三章交代了明、朝鮮、后金三方關(guān)系,以作為李廷龜庚申出使的背景。介紹了女真隸屬明朝的情況,對女真隸屬朝鮮的情況做了考辯。論述了明朝與朝鮮相互的不信任以及明朝官員索賄對中朝關(guān)系造成的負面影響。在朝鮮與后金關(guān)系變化方面,特別是研究了薩爾滸之戰(zhàn)中朝鮮軍隊的表現(xiàn)以及投降的原因,筆者不完全同意以往學者認為朝鮮軍隊在光海君授意之下投降的觀點,認為投降的主要原因是朝鮮軍隊沒有斗志,又極端缺乏軍糧,對女真鐵騎地極端恐懼之下而投降。 第四章分析了李廷龜庚申出使的直接原因。一方面是明朝對朝鮮是否背叛的強烈懷疑,探討了遼東流言的真實性。另一方面是明朝部分官員如徐光啟、張至發(fā)、熊廷弼的主張對朝鮮造成了極大的壓力。這些直接原因促使了李廷龜?shù)霓q誣之行。 第五章陳述了李廷龜庚申使明的詳細過程。首先談了李廷龜出任辯誣使的過程,以及他在出使前的策略規(guī)劃。然后論述了他出使的詳細過程,包括拜見熊廷弼,給禮部、兵部呈文,以及數(shù)次拜見方從哲,最終獲得昭雪皇敕的情況。最后論述了李廷龜參加神宗葬禮和光宗登基儀典的情況。 第六章論述李廷龜出使事件的結(jié)果和影響。結(jié)果方面,李廷龜取得兩道明帝敕書,明朝雖有一點詰責的意味,但是仍然承認了朝鮮的忠誠,預示了李廷龜辯誣任務(wù)的成功。影響方面,明朝的賞諭客觀上對于光海君而言是一種默許和縱容,它導致了朝鮮私通后金地繼續(xù)、光海君以后的事實上中立以及間接導致光海君被廢。 第七章是結(jié)論章。首先分析了李廷龜辯誣順利成功的原因,第一是朝鮮對中朝關(guān)系的惡化程度估計過于嚴重,第二是明朝內(nèi)部從皇帝到朝臣的欠缺責任心,對有益的遼東策略置之不理,第三是明朝的相關(guān)官員都收受了朝鮮的巨額賄賂。最后論述了光海君兩端外交的客觀效果,筆者認為皇太極的入侵與朝鮮兩端外交的終止沒有直接的因果關(guān)系,而和皇太極對于朝鮮一貫的強硬態(tài)度直接相關(guān),因此皇太極當政后數(shù)月內(nèi)即進攻朝鮮。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly discusses the event of the Korean Minister, Lee Ting turtles (1620), which belongs to the history of Sino Korean relations and the category of the former history of Qing Dynasty. The core figure is Li Tinggui Li Tinggui, the Korean heavy minister in the Korean calendar, Emperor Guang Hai, and the three dynasties of Ren Zu, which moved from the scholar to the right to the right to the government, and is an important figure in the history of the North Korea. On the other hand, Li Tinggui was also an important figure, because he made the Ming Dynasty four times in his life, the first to defend the falsely falsely, and the last time to defend the Korean private gold event. This was an important event which had a great influence on the relations between China and the DPRK. The core event around the paper was the incident of the Ming Dynasty, which was led by Li Ting, the former, the cause and the consequences of the envoy, and the incident. The problems related to the relationship between China and the DPRK reflected behind the back.
This paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the related research on the history of Sino Korean relations. The predecessors and scholars have a lot of discussion on the history of Sino Korean relations, and the research has been quite deep, but it is mainly around the changes of the North Korea and the post gold, the Ming and Guan department before and after the war of the back gold, and the changes of the Ming and Guan department in Li Tinggui Geng Shen. People pay close attention to it, so it is necessary to study specific diplomatic events around specific figures.
The second chapter discusses the life of Li Tinggui and his first three events of Ming Dynasty. It briefly introduces Li Tinggui's related situation and his official experience, and focuses on his first three times: the reform movement of 1898 (1598).
The third chapter gives an account of the three party relations of Ming, DPRK, and later gold, as the background of the envoy of Li Ting turtles, introducing the situation of the Ming Dynasty and the situation of the Ming Dynasty. It also makes an examination of the situation of the women who belong to the DPRK. It discusses the mutual distrust between the Ming Dynasty and the DPRK and the negative influence of the officials of the Ming Dynasty on the Sino Korean customs. In particular, we studied the performance of the Korean army and the reasons for the surrender of the Korean army in the battle of the Sarhu. The author did not fully agree with the previous scholars that the Korean army had given the surrender of the Korean army under the grace of the king of Konghai. The main reason for the surrender was that the Korean army had no fighting and extreme lack of military grain. Drop.
The fourth chapter analyzes the direct cause of Li Tinggui's envoy. On the one hand, it is the strong suspicion of the North Korean betrayal in the Ming Dynasty and the authenticity of the Liaodong rumors. On the other hand, some officials of the Ming Dynasty, such as Xu Guangqi, Zhang Zhifa, and Xiong Tingbi, caused great pressure to the DPRK. These direct reasons prompted Li Tinggui to defend the false accusations. It's a trip.
The fifth chapter states the detailed process of Li Tinggui Geng Shen to make Ming. First, it talks about the process of Li Tinggui's appointment to defend and false accusations, as well as his strategy planning before his envoy, and then discusses the detailed process of his envoy, including the introduction of Xiong Tingbi, the gift department, the Military Ministry, and the final acquisition of the emperor Zhao Xue. Li Tinggui attended the funeral ceremony of emperor Shen and the ceremony of attending the throne.
The sixth chapter discusses the result and influence of Li Tinggui's envoy incident. As a result, Li Tinggui has made two imperial edict of Ming emperor, although there is a little accusations of the Ming Dynasty, but still acknowledges the loyalty of the DPRK, which indicates the success of Li Tinggui's false accusations. It led to the continuation of the Korean territory after the fornication, and in fact, the neutrality of Guang Hai Jun led to the disappearance of Guang Hai Jun.
The seventh chapter is the conclusion chapter. First, the reasons for the successful success of Li Tinggui's false accusations are analyzed. The first is that the deterioration of the relations between China and the DPRK is too serious. The second is the lack of responsibility in the Ming Dynasty from the emperor to the courtiers, ignoring the beneficial Liaodong strategy, and the third of the relevant officials of the Ming Dynasty received a huge bribe from the DPRK. Finally, the objective effect of the diplomacy between the two ends of the emperor was discussed. The author believes that there is no direct causal relationship between the invasion of the Royal Taiji and the termination of the diplomatic relations between the two sides of the DPRK, and it is directly related to the hard line attitude of the emperor to the DPRK.
【學位授予單位】：陜西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K312

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王臻;;后金朝鮮議和與李廷龜?shù)耐饨换顒覽J];遼東學院學報(社會科學版);2013年01期

2 黃修志;;萬歷朝鮮之役后期的中朝黨爭與外交[J];韓國研究論叢;2013年01期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 孫笑仙;明代朝鮮朝使臣送別詩歌研究[D];魯東大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1924238