本文選題：《1946年就業(yè)法》 + 充分就業(yè)議案��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文以美國《1946年就業(yè)法》為研究對象,探究其制定的背景與過程并且對該法律進行評價。20世紀(jì)30年代經(jīng)濟大危機期間,羅斯福新政用以工代賑的方式,安置數(shù)百萬勞動力就業(yè),但是,嚴格地講,這種應(yīng)急性措施并未涉及勞工的技術(shù)培訓(xùn)。第二次世界大戰(zhàn)結(jié)束時,大多數(shù)美國人并沒有擺脫經(jīng)濟危機帶來的恐懼。美國在第二次世界大戰(zhàn)所實現(xiàn)的充分就業(yè)與30年代經(jīng)濟危機形成鮮明對比,促使充分就業(yè)作為戰(zhàn)后目標(biāo)提到政府和國會的議事日程。在杜魯門的經(jīng)濟綱領(lǐng)中,充分就業(yè)是重要內(nèi)容之一。但是,凱恩斯主義關(guān)于運用財政政策作為管理經(jīng)濟手段的理論論述,在美國引起了保守主義者和自由主義者的爭論,1945年充分就業(yè)議案沒有獲得國會的批準(zhǔn),最后經(jīng)過參議院和眾議院的討論,通過了《1946年就業(yè)法》,它決定“促進最大限度的就業(yè)、生產(chǎn)和購買力”,《1946年就業(yè)法》之后,就業(yè)與培訓(xùn)也開始被納入國策之中,因而它標(biāo)志著美國就業(yè)與培訓(xùn)政策體系確立的開始。在此之后,直至1968年,美國國會先后頒布十余項法案,其中最主要的是《1962年人力開發(fā)與培訓(xùn)法》和《1964年經(jīng)濟機會法》。這些法案都構(gòu)成了比較完整的就業(yè)與培訓(xùn)政策體系的核心,并在維持就業(yè)市場供求關(guān)系的平衡、減少失業(yè)人口、推動社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展等方面起到了積極作用。 引言部分介紹了本文探究的問題的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、選題緣由與研究意義、研究思路與方法。 第一章主要研究美國《1946年就業(yè)法》出臺的背景,主要是從大蕭條的影響和凱恩斯及其理論對美國的影響這兩方面來探究。 第二章從充分就業(yè)議案的提出、自由主義者對議案的支持和保守主義者對議案的反對三方面介紹美國《1946年就業(yè)法》出臺的過程。 第三章對美國《1946年就業(yè)法》的內(nèi)容和它決定成立的兩個機構(gòu):經(jīng)濟顧問委員會和國會聯(lián)合委員會作出評價。 結(jié)語部分對全文進行總結(jié)和概括,梳理了美國《1946年就業(yè)法》出臺的背景、過程及其意義。它的出臺并不一帆風(fēng)順,保守主義者和自由主義者對其各持己見,相互制衡。同充分就業(yè)議案比較,《1946年就業(yè)法》是一種倒退,但是它是一個標(biāo)志性的法案,對美國的就業(yè)和培訓(xùn)政策的實踐有重要意義。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the Employment Act 1946 of the United States as the research object, explores the background and process of its formulation, and evaluates the law. During the Great Economic crisis of the 1930s, Roosevelt's New deal employed millions of workers in the form of relief for work. Strictly speaking, however, this emergency measure does not involve technical training for workers. At the end of World War II, most Americans were not free from the fear of the economic crisis. The full employment achieved in the second World War in the United States is in sharp contrast to the economic crisis in the 1930s, which has prompted the full employment to be put on the agenda of the government and Congress as the goal of the postwar war. In Truman's economic program, full employment is one of the important contents. However, the Keynesian theory of using fiscal policy as a means of managing the economy caused controversy between conservatives and liberals in the United States, and the 1945 full employment bill was not approved by Congress. Finally, after discussions in the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Employment Act 1946 was passed, which decided to "promote maximum employment, production and purchasing power." after the Employment Act 1946, employment and training began to be incorporated into state policy. Therefore, it marks the beginning of the establishment of American employment and training policy system. After that, until 1968, the United States Congress enacted more than ten bills, the most important of which was the Manpower Development and training Act 1962 and the Economic opportunity Act 1964. These acts form the core of a relatively complete employment and training policy system, and play a positive role in maintaining the balance between supply and demand in the job market, reducing the number of unemployed people, and promoting social and economic development. The introduction introduces the domestic and international research status, the reason and significance of the topic, the research ideas and methods. The first chapter mainly studies the background of American Employment Act 1946, mainly from two aspects: the impact of the Great Depression and the influence of Keynes and his theory on the United States. The second chapter introduces the process of American Employment Act 1946 from three aspects: the proposal of full employment bill, the support of liberals to the bill and the opposition of conservatives to the bill. The third chapter evaluates the contents of the Employment Act 1946 and the two bodies it decided to establish: the Council of Economic Advisers and the Joint Committee of Congress. The conclusion summarizes and summarizes the full text, combing the background, process and significance of American Employment Act 1946. It was not always easy, with conservatives and liberals holding their own, counterbalancing each other. Compared with the full Employment Act, the Employment Act 1946 is a retrogression, but it is an iconic act, which is of great significance to the practice of employment and training policies in the United States.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K712.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高嵩;;20世紀(jì)中葉美國各界對人力與失業(yè)問題的思辨[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 閆政富;杜魯門的“公平施政”評述[J];丹東師專學(xué)報;1998年01期

3 王章佩;美國社會福利政策演變考察[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期

4 瞿茜;;1946—1953年杜魯門政府的社會福利保障政策[J];高等函授學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期

5 李存訓(xùn);論杜魯門的“公平施政”[J];世界歷史;1983年03期

6 梁茂信;戰(zhàn)后美國就業(yè)和培訓(xùn)政策體系的形成[J];世界歷史;2001年05期

7 黃安年;本世紀(jì)中葉美國政府就業(yè)培訓(xùn)法案內(nèi)容及相關(guān)政策[J];九江師專學(xué)報;1998年03期

8 鄭吉昌,黃芳;人力資源管理:全球化趨勢下的挑戰(zhàn)與對策[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2002年05期

9 胡孝峰;戰(zhàn)后美國的經(jīng)濟[J];歷史教學(xué);1997年10期

10 梁茂信;;美國人力培訓(xùn)與就業(yè)政策機制(1971—1982)[J];歷史研究;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳建平;在“公平施政”的旗幟下——杜魯門政府內(nèi)政研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

2 高嵩;肯尼迪—約翰遜政府就業(yè)與培訓(xùn)政策研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王宇絢;20世紀(jì)60年代美國的人力培訓(xùn)政策與充分就業(yè)[D];河北師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1918007