本文選題：美國對越政策 + 中越關系��； 參考：《北京師范大學》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 冷戰(zhàn)時期,美蘇兩極對峙。美國從其全球戰(zhàn)略角度出發(fā),為了遏制共產主義的擴張,在印度支那地區(qū)支持反共勢力,特別是支援南越政權,防止北方共產主義的擴張。1961-1969年是美國對越政策的一個關鍵時期,此時美國隨著越南形勢的變化而制定了不同的對越政策。在這一時期,中國對南越形勢的變化產生極其重要的影響,從而進一步制約了美國的對越政策。 在此時期,中越兩國從地緣政治的角度出發(fā),面對共同的敵人——美帝國主義者,建立了“同志加兄弟”的深厚情誼。為此,當越南領導人向中國提出物資援助后,中國義無反顧地大力支援越南,這些物資有力地保障了北方的建設和南方人民的抗美斗爭,使美國在制定南越戰(zhàn)略時受挫。美國面對南越日益惡化的形勢,相信“多米諾骨牌”效應,為了贏得這場戰(zhàn)爭,決定對越南實行戰(zhàn)爭升級。面對美國的戰(zhàn)爭升級,中國作出強烈反應,除了對美國表示強烈抗議外,還秘密派出后勤支援部隊,支持越南人民的抗美斗爭。美國對此不得不加大對北越的轟炸力度,同時向南越不斷增派地面部隊。在中越軍民的共同戰(zhàn)斗下,北越防空作戰(zhàn)取得許多勝利,美國并未取得預期的轟炸效果。與此同時,北越人民軍大量進入南越,與南解武裝部隊并肩作戰(zhàn),共同消滅侵犯自己家園的敵人,美軍陷入南越人民不斷打擊中。面對越南人民的抵抗高潮,美軍傷亡人數不斷增加,為了早日解決越南問題,美國開始同北越進行和談接觸。但是北越在中國的影響下,認為未在戰(zhàn)場上取得勝利,就不可能在談判桌上取得勝利,因此對談判條件絲毫不放松。1968年春季攻勢過后,北越軍隊損失很大,這時北越領導人開始認真考慮和談問題。就在這一年,美國宣布停止轟炸北緯20度以北地區(qū),越南方面立即作出反應,表示同意派代表與美國談判。但是兩國談判仍未取得很大進展,這主要在于中美兩國關系未得到改善。直到1972年尼克松訪華后,中美關系開始改善,中國開始支持越美和談,在此情況下,中國積極推動美越兩國的和談,最后終于簽訂了巴黎協(xié)定。 在1961-1969年美國的對越政策中,中國始終起著至關重要的作用,制約著美國的對越政策,同時也使美國認識到中國的重要性。中蘇關系破裂后,美國看到改善中美關系的可能性,同時中國也意識到應該“聯(lián)美抗蘇”,于是雙方秘密接觸,最終在尼克松時期實現(xiàn)中美關系的正常化。中國在改善與美國關系后,也反過來積極推動越美和談,促進《巴黎協(xié)定》的簽訂,為以后越南的統(tǒng)一奠定了基礎。
[Abstract]:During the cold war, the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other. From its global strategic point of view, in order to curb the expansion of communism, the United States supported anti-Communist forces in the Indochina region, especially the South Vietnamese regime, and prevented the expansion of communism in the North. 1961-1969 was a key period of American policy towards Vietnam. At this time, the United States with the changes in the situation in Vietnam to formulate a different policy toward Vietnam. During this period, China exerted an extremely important influence on the change of the situation in South Vietnam, which further restricted the policy of the United States towards Vietnam. In this period, China and Vietnam, from the geopolitical point of view, faced with the common enemy-American imperialists, established a deep friendship of "comrades and brothers". For this reason, when Vietnam's leaders offered China material assistance, China made great efforts to support Vietnam, which effectively guaranteed the construction of the north and the struggle of the people of the south against the United States, which frustrated the United States in formulating the strategy of South Vietnam. Faced with the worsening situation in South Vietnam, the United States believed in the domino effect and decided to escalate the war against Vietnam in order to win the war. In the face of the escalation of the war in the United States, China reacted strongly. In addition to expressing strong protests against the United States, it also secretly dispatched logistic support troops to support the Vietnamese people in their struggle against the United States. The United States had to step up its bombardment of North Vietnam and send more ground troops to South Vietnam. Under the joint combat between Chinese and Vietnamese, the North Vietnamese air defense has won many victories, but the United States has not achieved the expected bombing effect. At the same time, the North Vietnamese people's Army entered South Vietnam in large numbers, fought alongside the armed forces of the South Liberation Army, and jointly eliminated the enemies who violated their homes, and the US military fell into continuous attack by the people of South Vietnam. In the face of the high tide of resistance among the Vietnamese people, the number of US military casualties has been increasing. In order to resolve the Vietnamese issue as soon as possible, the United States began peace talks with North Vietnam. However, under the influence of China, North Vietnam believes that it is impossible to win at the negotiating table without victory on the battlefield, so it will not relax the conditions of negotiation. After the spring offensive of 1968, the North Vietnamese army lost a lot of money. The North Vietnamese leaders began to think seriously about the peace talks. Just this year, the United States announced a halt to the bombing of areas north of 20 degrees N, and Vietnam immediately responded by agreeing to send representatives to negotiate with the United States. But negotiations between the two countries have not made much progress, mainly because relations between China and the United States have not improved. It was not until 1972, after Nixon's visit to China, that Sino-US relations began to improve and China began to support the Vietnamese peace talks. Under such circumstances, China actively promoted the peace talks between the United States and Vietnam, and finally signed the Paris Agreement. In the 1961-1969 American policy toward Vietnam, China always played a vital role, which restricted the American policy towards Vietnam, and also made the United States realize the importance of China. After the breakdown of Sino-Soviet relations, the United States saw the possibility of improving Sino-US relations, and China also realized that it should "unite the United States against the Soviet Union." so the two sides made secret contacts and finally realized the normalization of Sino-US relations during Nixon's time. After improving its relations with the United States, China, in turn, actively promoted the peace talks between Vietnam and the United States and promoted the signing of the Paris Accords, which laid the foundation for the reunification of Vietnam in the future.
【學位授予單位】：北京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K712

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李丹慧;中蘇在援越抗美問題上的沖突與矛盾(1965—1972)(上)[J];當代中國史研究;2000年04期

2 侯松嶺;論美國策動朗諾發(fā)動政變的原因[J];東南亞研究;1991年01期

3 劉建飛;冷戰(zhàn)后美國對越政策中的意識形態(tài)因素[J];國際觀察;2002年03期

4 程曉敏;“第四政府”與美國對越南戰(zhàn)爭的政策——以1961—1968年大眾傳媒為研究對象[J];高等函授學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年01期

5 時殷弘;逐漸升級戰(zhàn)略及其失敗——論1965至1968年美國對北越的轟炸[J];美國研究;1993年02期

6 祿德安;冷戰(zhàn)與美國在越南的局部戰(zhàn)爭(1963-1968)[J];洛陽師范學院學報;2005年01期

7 章百家;“抗美援朝”與“援越抗美”——中國如何應對朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭和越南戰(zhàn)爭[J];世界經濟與政治;2005年03期

8 金衛(wèi)星;冷戰(zhàn)期間美國在東亞的遏制戰(zhàn)略[J];蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年05期

9 覃雪源;中蘇在越南問題上的博弈對中越關系的影響(1965—1978)[J];廣西師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年03期

10 呂桂霞;美國兵敗越南的原因論析[J];聊城大學學報(社會科學版);2003年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉東明;從羅斯福到艾森豪威爾1940—1954年美國的越南政策[D];首都師范大學;2002年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張秀閣;國家利益在外交決策中的考量[D];廣西師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1848817