本文選題：田中外交 + 東方會議　； 參考：《黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 田中義一是日本昭和時期軍閥當(dāng)政的第一人。在制定侵華政策,推行侵華謀略方面,以他為首的內(nèi)閣起到了承前啟后的重大作用。他主持的“東方會議”被視為日本侵華政策的一大轉(zhuǎn)折——從協(xié)調(diào)走向積極對華政策的轉(zhuǎn)折,屬于日本大陸政策的重要部分。本文主要圍繞田中義一的對華政策,闡述日本對中國東北的侵略政策由協(xié)調(diào)走向強(qiáng)硬,以及其武力外交的實施,展現(xiàn)20世紀(jì)20年代末,日本帝國主義對東北的侵略和對東北亞國際關(guān)系的影響。全文共分三個部分。 第一部分從幣原外交和田中外交的歷史淵源入手,闡述了由協(xié)調(diào)走向積極的日本對華政策。華盛頓會議后,日本在外交上陷于孤立,在經(jīng)濟(jì)上擺脫不了對美國的依賴,此時的幣原外交表面上是“協(xié)調(diào)外交”,卻內(nèi)藏對華侵略之實。幣原在南京事件及漢口事件上的應(yīng)對引起日本國內(nèi)的反對浪潮,1927年日本又爆發(fā)了大規(guī)模的經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī),直接導(dǎo)致了“幣原外交”的中斷,開始了“田中外交”。田中上任后,積極著手四件事:幫助資產(chǎn)階級度過金融危機(jī);在政治上拉攏蔣介石;出兵山東;召開東方會議,推行“對華積極政策”。 第二部分論述了田中積極的對華政策,其政策是通過召開東方會議來集中體現(xiàn)的。該會議在詳細(xì)分析了中國政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)及軍事形勢的基礎(chǔ)上,重點討論確定了新的對華政策,制定了《對華政策綱領(lǐng)》(共八條)。文中對該綱領(lǐng)進(jìn)行了具體闡釋,并通過該綱領(lǐng)與《田中奏折》的對照分析,探討了《田中奏折》存來的合理性。同時,采取何種措施成為新的對華政策成敗的關(guān)鍵,文中以日本出兵山東的三個目的為主線,闡述介紹了東方會議決策的具體實施及結(jié)果。 第三部分對田中外交政策作出評價并闡述其影響。主要通過對田中外交與幣原外交的背景、形式、特點的比較分析來深入認(rèn)識田中的積極對華政策。在田中內(nèi)閣時期,美、日、中三國之間存在著兩個主要矛盾:第一,中國國民政府的北伐統(tǒng)一政策與日本滿蒙獨立政策的矛盾;第二,美國“門戶開放”政策與日本“大陸政策”的矛盾。然而,這兩個矛盾是密不可分、利益息息相關(guān)的,他們爭奪中國的媒介便是蔣介石集團(tuán)。通過美、日對蔣介石勢力的爭奪及蔣介石的態(tài)度由親日至疏日到親英美的轉(zhuǎn)變來分析田中外交對東北亞國際關(guān)系的影響。由于田中內(nèi)閣時期,日本關(guān)東軍制造了震驚中外的皇姑屯事件,田中對此事件的解釋前后不一,引起天皇極度不滿,直接導(dǎo)致田中義一引咎辭職, 田中外交因此而落幕。 田中外交雖未得逞,但它為日本軍國主義武力攫取東北開辟了道路。田中積極的侵華政策,也成為日本隨后發(fā)動“九一八”事變與全面侵華的指導(dǎo)信念,同時也為日本準(zhǔn)備同美、英等大國進(jìn)行大規(guī)模戰(zhàn)爭即日后的太平洋戰(zhàn)爭埋下了伏筆。
[Abstract]:Tanaka Ishiichi was the first Japanese warlord in the period of Showa. The cabinet headed by him played an important role in formulating the policy of invading China and carrying out the strategy of invading China. The Oriental Conference, which he chaired, is regarded as a turning point in Japan's policy of invading China-from coordination to active China policy, which is an important part of Japan's mainland policy. Focusing on Tanaka's China policy, this paper expounds Japan's policy of aggression against Northeast China from coordination to toughness, and the implementation of its diplomacy of force, showing the end of the 1920s. Japanese imperialism's invasion of Northeast China and its influence on Northeast Asia's International Relations. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part starts with the historical origin of Coin Yuan diplomacy and Tanaka diplomacy, and expounds Japan's China policy from coordination to active. After the Washington Conference, Japan was isolated in diplomacy and could not get rid of its dependence on the United States economically. At this time, the currency diplomacy was on the surface "coordinated diplomacy", but it contained the reality of aggression against China. The response of Coin to the Nanjing incident and the Hankou incident caused a wave of opposition in Japan. In 1927, Japan again broke out a large-scale economic crisis, which directly led to the interruption of "Coin's diplomacy" and began the "Tanaka diplomacy". After Tanaka took office, he actively set about four things: helping the bourgeoisie through the financial crisis; drawing in Jiang Jieshi politically; sending troops to Shandong; convening an Oriental conference to carry out a "positive policy toward China." The second part discusses Tanaka's active policy towards China, which is embodied by convening the Oriental Conference. On the basis of detailed analysis of China's political, economic, and military situation, the meeting focused on defining a new China policy and formulating the "China Policy Program" (a total of eight articles). In this paper, the concrete explanation of this program is given, and the rationality of its existence is discussed through the comparison and analysis between this program and Tian Zhong's Biography. At the same time, what measures to be taken is the key to the success or failure of the new China policy. This paper, taking the three purposes of Japan's sending troops to Shandong Province as the main line, expounds the concrete implementation and the results of the decision of the Eastern Conference. The third part evaluates Tanaka's foreign policy and expounds its influence. Through the comparative analysis of the background, form and characteristics of Tanaka diplomacy and Coin's diplomacy, we can deeply understand Tanaka's active China policy. During the Tanaka Cabinet period, there were two major contradictions between the United States, Japan, and China: first, the contradiction between the Chinese National Government's policy of unification of the Northern Expedition and the policy of Japan's independence of Manchuria and Mongolia; and second, The contradiction between American "Open door" Policy and Japan's "mainland Policy". However, these two contradictions are inseparable, the interests are closely linked, they compete for China's media is Jiang Jieshi Group. This paper analyzes the influence of Tanaka diplomacy on the international relations in Northeast Asia through the changes of American, Japanese and Japanese contending for Jiang Jieshi's influence and the change of Jiang Jieshi's attitude from pro-Japan to anti-Japanese to pro-Anglo-American. As a result of the Tanaka Cabinet period, the Japanese Guandong Army created the Huanggutun incident, which shocked China and foreign countries. The inconsistency in the explanation of this incident caused the emperor to be extremely dissatisfied, which directly led to the resignation of Yi Tanaka. Tanaka diplomacy ended as a result. Tanaka diplomacy failed, but it opened the way for Japanese militarism to seize the northeast by force. Tanaka's active policy of invading China also became Japan's guiding belief in launching the "September 18" incident and invading China in an all-round way, and at the same time laid the groundwork for Japan's preparations for a large-scale war with the United States and Great Britain, that is, the Pacific War in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K313.45

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金基鳳;;“東方會議”與“大陸政策”[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1985年02期

2 張志強(qiáng);徐建東;;試析旅順東方會議[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1985年01期

3 任永祥;“九·一八”事變是日本推行“大陸政策”的一個重要步驟[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1996年05期

4 李家振;;談東方會議與《田中奏折》[J];春秋;1995年02期

5 潘喜廷;;日本東方會議與炸死張作霖[J];黑河學(xué)刊;1986年02期

6 蔡智堪;;一個愛國者應(yīng)盡的責(zé)任——潛人日皇宮險取“田中奏折”始末[J];黨史縱橫;1991年04期

7 邢麗雅;“九·一八”事變前后日本對“滿蒙政策”的演變[J];史學(xué)集刊;1999年03期

8 王珍仁;;歷史上東京與旅順的“東方會議”[J];東北史地;2009年03期

9 佟振宇;日本軍界曾迷信“逢七必勝”[J];科技文萃;1994年09期

10 沈予;關(guān)于《田中奏折》若干問題的再探討[J];歷史研究;1995年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 金學(xué)俠;;七七事變——難忘的歷史紀(jì)念日[A];新四軍研究（第一輯）[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 高寧;東方廣場為商務(wù)人士新添“三大件”[N];國際商報;2003年

2 彭匈;戰(zhàn)爭原生態(tài) 遠(yuǎn)東全鏡頭[N];中國新聞出版報;2006年

3 王毓莉;蔡智堪與《田中奏折》事件[N];中國檔案報;2010年

4 ;東方廣場榮獲“2003年度北京最佳寫字樓”獎[N];市場報;2004年

5 明文;八大保險巨頭搶灘東方廣場[N];中國商報;2004年

6 王麗;北京市區(qū)中心　最后一幢甲級寫字樓即將推出[N];中華工商時報;2004年

7 王希亮;張作霖的確死于日本關(guān)東軍之手[N];北京日報;2003年

8 閆延文;讓我來抒寫臺灣抗日史[N];中國教育報;2005年

9 高寧;北京顯現(xiàn)“總部經(jīng)濟(jì)”競爭優(yōu)勢[N];國際商報;2004年

10 李曉明;跨國公司云集東方廣場[N];中國商報;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 粟鳳榕;論田中義一的對華政策[D];黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院;2009年

2 楊悅心;田中義一內(nèi)閣時期對華強(qiáng)硬外交述評[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年

3 劉東;關(guān)東軍與張作霖[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1836202